Pelvic Floor Shear-Wave Elastography in Healthy and Pudendal Neuralgia Women (ELANEP)

March 13, 2026 updated by: Comenius University

Comparison of Superficial Pelvic Floor Shear Wave Elastography Between Healthy Women and Women With Pudendal Neuralgia

This study will compare superficial pelvic floor shear-wave elastography between healthy women and women with pudendal neuralgia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Using shear-wave elastography, this study will compare the superficial pelvic floor muscles (bulbospongiosus, ischiocavernosus, and superficial transverse perineal muscles) between healthy women and women with pudendal neuralgia.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Slovakia
      • Martin, Slovakia, Slovakia, 040 22
        • Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine , Martin, Slovakia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Study Population This observational study enrolled adult women (≥18 years) categorized into two cohorts: a pudendal neuralgia (PN) group and a healthy control group.

Participants in the PN group were recruited from an outpatient clinic database. Inclusion required a diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia confirmed by a gynecologist according to the Nantes criteria (Labat et al., 2008), including a positive response to an anesthetic pudendal nerve block, and a symptom duration of ≥ 3 months.

The healthy control group consisted of volunteers recruited from university staff with no history of chronic pelvic pain or pelvic floor dysfunction.

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Pudendal Neuralgia Group)

Diagnosis of Pudendal Neuralgia based on the Nantes diagnostic criteria (Labat et al., 2008), specifically:

  • Pain located in the anatomical territory of the pudendal nerve.
  • Pain worsened by sitting.
  • Pain that does not wake the patient at night.
  • No objective sensory loss on clinical examination.
  • Positive response to an anesthetic pudendal nerve block.
  • Duration of symptoms: Chronic pelvic pain persisting for more than 3 months.
  • Demographics: Women aged (≥18 years).
  • Voluntary participation: Ability to understand and sign informed consent.

Inclusion Criteria (Healthy Controls)

  • Demographics: Women aged (≥18 years).
  • Asymptomatic status: No history or current symptoms of chronic pelvic pain or pelvic floor dysfunction (confirmed by clinical interview/screening).
  • Voluntary participation: Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria (Both Groups)

  • Medical Comorbidities: Diagnosed psychiatric, neurological (other than PN), severe internal, orthopedic, or oncological diseases that could interfere with the study outcomes.
  • Recent Interventions: History of botulinum toxin therapy to the pelvic floor within the last 12 months.
  • Pelvic surgery within the last 12 months.
  • Data Integrity: Incomplete or incorrectly filled questionnaires.
  • General: Unwillingness to participate or inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Women with Pudendal Neuralgia
Adult women (≥18 years) with chronic pelvic pain consistent with pudendal neuralgia . The diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia was confirmed by a gynecologist.
Imaging was performed using a Consona N8 ultrasound system (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.) equipped with shear-wave elastography (SWE) software. A linear-array transducer (L13-3N; frequency range 3.0-13.0 MHz; field of view ~3.8-4.0 cm) was used to obtain pelvic floor muscle (PFM) images. Measurements were performed using shell analysis by comparing two locations within the same pelvic floor muscle: the sites with the highest and lowest stiffness (kPa).
The PFIQ-7 is a 21-item questionnaire (three scales with seven items each) assessing the impact of pelvic floor disorders on daily life. Items are scored from 0 to 3, and the total score ranges from 0 to 300. Higher scores indicate greater impact/distress.
The FSDS-R is a 13-item questionnaire assessing sexually related personal distress in women, with a total score range of 0-52. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never to 4 = always). Higher scores indicate greater sexual distress.
Healthy women
Healthy women (≥18 years) with no history of chronic pelvic pain or pelvic floor dysfunction.
Imaging was performed using a Consona N8 ultrasound system (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.) equipped with shear-wave elastography (SWE) software. A linear-array transducer (L13-3N; frequency range 3.0-13.0 MHz; field of view ~3.8-4.0 cm) was used to obtain pelvic floor muscle (PFM) images. Measurements were performed using shell analysis by comparing two locations within the same pelvic floor muscle: the sites with the highest and lowest stiffness (kPa).
The PFIQ-7 is a 21-item questionnaire (three scales with seven items each) assessing the impact of pelvic floor disorders on daily life. Items are scored from 0 to 3, and the total score ranges from 0 to 300. Higher scores indicate greater impact/distress.
The FSDS-R is a 13-item questionnaire assessing sexually related personal distress in women, with a total score range of 0-52. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never to 4 = always). Higher scores indicate greater sexual distress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Superficial Pelvic Floor Muscle (Bulbospongiosus, Ischiocavernosus, Superficial Transverse Perineal Muscles)Stiffness (kPa) Measured by Shear-wave Elastography
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)
Stiffness of superficial pelvic floor muscles (bulbospongiosus, ischiocavernosus, superficial transverse perineal muscles) assessed with SWE; comparison between healthy women and women with pudendal neuralgia. Shell analysis was used to identify and compare two specific locations within each muscle: the site of maximum stiffness (b-site) and the site of minimum stiffness (a-site). The data represent the maximum stiffness measured at the most affected sites in KPa. Detailed results for all measured anatomical locations and planes are provided in the full study manuscript.
Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic Floor Disorder Impact on Quality of Life (PFIQ-7 Total Score and Subscale Scores)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)
Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7) This 21-item instrument assesses the impact of pelvic floor disorders across three domains: bladder (Urinary Impact Questionnaire, UIQ-7), bowel (Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire, CRAIQ-7), and vaginal symptoms. Items are scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 300; higher scores indicate a greater negative impact on quality of life .
Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)
Sexual Distress (FSDS-R Total Score)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)
Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) total score (0-52). Higher scores indicate greater sexual distress.
Baseline (Day 1 after enrollment; single assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magdalena Hagovska, prof.PhDr.PhD., Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Medical Faculty, Kosice Slovakia
  • Study Director: Jan Svihra, prof.MUDr.PhD., Comenius University Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Slovakia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Women

Clinical Trials on Pelvic floor shear wave elastography

Subscribe