Copper Supplementation in Cirrhosis

March 10, 2026 updated by: Lei Yu, University of Washington

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Biochemical Effect, Safety and Patient Reported Outcomes of Copper Supplementation in Patients With Cirrhosis

End stage liver disease or cirrhosis is a major cause of mortality in the United States and the world. Other than targeting the underlying cause, such as alcohol cessation and antiviral therapy, very few medical treatments can change the natural history of cirrhosis. Malnutrition is one of the few potentially modifiable factors that have been associated with cirrhosis severity and poor prognosis. The transition metal copper (Cu) is an essential trace metal that must be acquired from diet. Its metabolism is primarily regulated by the liver in its role as a master regulator of nutrients. In 2019, the investigators reported that Cu deficiency defined by below normal serum or liver concentrations occurred in a wide range of liver disorders and was associated with a severe disease phenotype. Improvement in liver function was observed in 2 of the 3 patients who received Cu supplementation. In 2023, the investigators conducted a longitudinal cohort study utilizing clinical, serum and liver explant tissue data from 183 cirrhosis patients. The investigators showed that Cu deficiency was associated with 2-fold higher infection rate and a more than 3-fold increase in the risk of death compared to patients with normal Cu status. These preliminary findings and the well-established importance of Cu in human health prompted the investigators to design the current pilot randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to determine the effect of Cu supplementation on Cu dependent biochemical changes, patient safety and patient reported outcomes in cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Approximately 41,000 people die annually of chronic liver disease (CLD) including liver cancer in the United States. Compared to other chronic diseases, patients with CLD have high rates of healthcare utilization and death. The annual cost of care for patients with cirrhosis, the most advanced stage of liver disease, is approximately $21 billion. While liver transplantation is a curative, albeit costly, treatment, there are far fewer donors than patients in need of liver transplants. Other than targeting the causes of cirrhosis, such as alcohol cessation and antiviral therapy, very few medical treatments can change the natural history of cirrhosis. Malnutrition is one of the few potentially modifiable factors that have been associated with cirrhosis severity and poor prognosis. Current guidelines in nutrition management focus on protein and calorie intake, with little consideration for trace metals, which have wide ranging physiological effects.

The transition metal copper (Cu) is an essential trace metal that must be acquired from diet. Absorption, uptake, export and transport of Cu are tightly regulated because both too much and too little Cu can cause cell damage, compromised immune function and organ dysfunction. Systemic Cu metabolism is primarily regulated by the liver in its role as a master regulator of nutrients. Whole body Cu status is best estimated by its blood concentration. Depending on laboratory benchmarks and sex, the lower limit of normal serum Cu is between 70-80 g/dL where concentrations below this range likely reflect systemic Cu deficiency.

In 2019, the investigators began an effort to better understand the role of Cu in liver disease and reported a series of patients who presented with unexplained low blood Cu concentrations. In this detailed report, Cu deficiency defined by below normal serum or liver concentrations occurred in a wide range of liver disorders and was associated with a severe disease phenotype. Improvement in liver function was observed in 2 of the 3 patients who received Cu supplementation. To further these preliminary observation, in 2023, the investigators conducted a longitudinal cohort study utilizing clinical, serum and liver explant tissue data from 183 cirrhosis patients. The investigators showed that Cu deficiency was associated with significantly higher infections rates (42% vs. 20%, p=0.01) and a more than 3-fold increase in the risk of death compared to patients with normal Cu status. These results provide concrete evidence that a complex, and potentially causal relationship exist between Cu status, compromised immune and metabolic functions and worse clinical outcomes in cirrhosis patients.

These preliminary findings and the well-established importance of Cu in human health raise several important questions: Does reduced circulating Cu, the standard definition of Cu deficiency in the general population, similarly reflect a deficiency state in cirrhosis? Is the higher infection and mortality risk observed among patients with low serum Cu mediated by Cu dependent enzymes and immune cells? Is reduced circulating Cu a secondary response in cirrhosis, therefore should be "left alone," or should patients receive Cu supplementation in order to improve functional Cu store and its associated physiological functions? To answer these questions, the investigators designed a pilot randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to determine the effect of Cu supplementation on Cu dependent biochemical changes, patient safety and patient reported outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Laura Sissons-Ross
  • Phone Number: 206-616-0397
  • Email: lsissons@uw.edu

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lei Yu, MD
        • Contact:
          • Shukriyah Samoun, BS
          • Phone Number: 2065433220
          • Email: shukrs@uw.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients age 18 or older with confirmed diagnosis of cirrhosis based on clinical history, exam, imaging, laboratory or histological criteria;
  2. Cirrhosis patients whose serum or plasma Cu are below the normal range (80-155 ug/dL for women and 70-140 ug/dL for men);
  3. Cirrhosis patients whose serum or plasma Cu are in the normal range but exhibit at least one clinical feature that has been associated with Cu deficiency. These include history of infections, unexplained anemia, severe leukopenia, iron overload, unexplained neurological symptoms such as ataxia or myelopathy, coagulopathy with spontaneous bleeding.

Patients must meet inclusion criteria 1 AND 2, or 1 AND 3 in order to be considered for the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with Wilson disease, cholestatic liver diseases including primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, all of which are associated with Cu overload;
  2. Patients with fulminant hepatic failure;
  3. Renal failure with a creatinine clearance <25 ml/minute;
  4. Hepatic encephalopathy more than grade 2 (Hepatic Encephalopathy in Chronic Liver Disease, 2014);
  5. MELD score >25 to minimize subject dropout due to been too ill;
  6. Serious non-liver related medical illnesses such as cardiopulmonary and renal diseases and non-liver malignancies;
  7. Active alcohol use;
  8. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Copper supplementation 1st arm
copper supplementation first, washout, then placebo
Oral copper gluconate 4 mg daily
Experimental: Placebo first arm
Placebo first, washout, then copper supplementation
Oral copper gluconate 4 mg daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma copper (Cu) concentration
Time Frame: From randomization to 1. end 6-week; 2. end of 9-week; 3. end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo); followed by a 3-week washout period; followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
The primary endpoint is the mean change in plasma Cu concentration between baseline and each intervention period
From randomization to 1. end 6-week; 2. end of 9-week; 3. end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo); followed by a 3-week washout period; followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers of functional Copper (Cu) status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Plasma ceruloplasmin concentration and activity
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Biomarkers of functional copper status
Time Frame: Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Plasma diamine oxidase concentration and activity
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Biomarker of functional copper status
Time Frame: Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Neutrophil and PBMC oxidative burst activity
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Biomarker of functional copper status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1. end 6-week; 2. end of 9-week; 3. end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo); followed by a 3-week washout period; followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
PBMC superoxide dismutase (CCS) mRNA expression
From randomization to 1. end 6-week; 2. end of 9-week; 3. end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo); followed by a 3-week washout period; followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Biomarker of functional copper status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Platelet cytochrome-C oxidase (COX) activity
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Safety measures
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Patient death before liver transplantation
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Safety measures
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Change in liver function based on MELD (maximum 40, high school worse liver function) and CTP score (5 to 15, higher school worse liver function)
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Safety measures
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Incidence of hospital admission from infection or bleeding
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Safety measure
Time Frame: Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Plasma ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG)
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or
Patient reported outcomes
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Change in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ)
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper)
Patient reported outcomes
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Short form health survey
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Functional and nutritional status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Liver frailty index based on grip strength, chair stands and balance
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Functional and nutritional status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
triceps skin fold in centimeters
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Functional and nutritional status
Time Frame: From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).
Mid-arm circumference in centimeter
From randomization to 1) end 6-week; 2) end of 9-week; 3) end of 15 week. First 6 week is intervention period 1 (either copper or placebo), followed by a 3-week washout period, followed by another 6-week intervention period (either placebo or copper).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lei Yu, MD, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

For patient confidentiality, we likely will not share individual data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Copper Gluconate

Subscribe