Determining the Effects of Training on Nursing Students Using Two Different Methods for Maintaining Fluid and Electrolyte Balance in a Child Trapped Under a Collapse

March 26, 2026 updated by: Sevil Özkan, Selcuk University

Determining the Effects of Training on Nursing Students Using Two Different Methods for Maintaining Fluid and Electrolyte Balance in a Child Trapped Under a Collapse: Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the effects of two different training methods on nursing students regarding the maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance in a child trapped under rubble. The sample consisted of 69 participants (conventional training group: 23; simulation group: 23; control group: 23). The traditional education group received training on nursing interventions related to fluid and electrolyte balance in children trapped under rubble in a single theoretical module lasting a total of 90 minutes. The simulation group, however, received the same training in two modules-combining theoretical instruction with a simulation scenario-over a total of 270 minutes. The control group received no training. Data were collected in two phases: a pre-test and a post-test; the post-tests were administered one month after the pre-test.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Mass disasters such as earthquakes have more severe and long-lasting biopsychosocial effects on children, whose developmental processes are ongoing and whose stress coping mechanisms are more limited compared to adults. In particular, building collapses pose a life-threatening danger to children. Crush injuries in children trapped under debris and the resulting physiological changes include disruption of fluid-electrolyte balance. Fluid-electrolyte imbalance resulting from tissue damage and Crush Syndrome can lead to life-threatening complications such as metabolic issues and acute kidney failure. Therefore, it is essential for pediatric nurses to possess the knowledge and skills necessary for caring for children in disaster conditions to ensure effective care can be maintained. This necessity highlights the importance of incorporating such knowledge and skills into the pediatric nursing undergraduate education curriculum.

It is crucial for pediatric nursing students to be adequately prepared to handle these complex and high-risk clinical situations they may encounter during disaster conditions, as this directly impacts the quality of care. However, factors such as the limited likelihood of encountering such cases in real clinical settings and the high workload and time constraints in clinical practice areas necessitate the use of alternative educational methods to help students develop their knowledge and skills. Traditional teaching methods, which are among the various approaches, are mostly teacher-centered and limited to question-and-answer sessions. For this reason, the use of simulation-based training methods has become increasingly widespread in recent years, particularly in the field of pediatric care.

This study included 69 students enrolled at the Faculty of Nursing at Selcuk University. Participants were divided into groups using sealed envelopes labeled SG, KEG, and KG. Prior to the study, the sample size for each group was calculated based on the effect size (d=0.80), power (.95), and alpha error (.05), resulting in a total of 57 participants. To prevent potential sampling issues that might arise during the study (such as participants not wishing to continue), the sample size was increased by 20%, resulting in a total of 69 nursing students (conventional education group: 23; simulation group: 23; control group: 23). The traditional education group received training on nursing interventions related to the fluid-electrolyte balance of a child trapped under debris in a single theoretical module lasting a total of 90 minutes. The simulation group, however, received the same training through both theoretical instruction and simulation scenario experience, in two modules totaling 270 minutes. The control group received no training.

Data were collected using an information form, a form assessing nursing students' nursing practices aimed at maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance in a child trapped under debris, and the Clinical Decision-Making Confidence and Anxiety Scale in Nursing. Validity and reliability studies for these scales were conducted on the Turkish population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be a fourth-year student in the School of Nursing at Selçuk University
  • Have successfully completed the Pediatric Nursing course
  • Participate in all training sessions on fluid and electrolyte management for children trapped under rubble
  • Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failing to attend 10% of the training sessions for students in the startup groups
  • Requesting to withdraw from the program at any stage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Classical education group
It consisted of a single module and three training topics (fluid and electrolyte balance in children, crush syndrome in children trapped under debris, and the role and responsibilities of pediatric nurses in emergency situations such as earthquakes and floods). The training was delivered by the researcher, with each topic lasting 30 minutes for a total duration of 90 minutes.
Other Names:
  • classical education group
Experimental: Simulation training group
It consists of two modules. The first module covers the same topics as the traditional training group. The second module covers the use of simulation in healthcare (30 min), a simulation-based training scenario involving an 8-year-old girl trapped under rubble, and case analysis. Regarding the use of simulation in healthcare, information was provided on the history of simulation, examples of simulation-based training in nursing and pediatric nursing, and the implementation plan for simulation-based training. Subsequently, the simulation case was introduced, and students participating in the simulation-based training were assigned seat numbers. A simple computer-generated random number table was used for randomization, and groups of three were selected in this manner. After the groups were determined, the students were taken to the simulation room. Information was provided about the case, the materials to be used, and the environment, and questions were answered. Following this stage,
Other Names:
  • simulation
No Intervention: Control group
No training was provided to the students in this group during the research process. After the analyses were completed, the training materials were also provided to this group in accordance with ethical principles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The intervention group is expected to score higher on the nursing intervention form aimed at maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance in children trapped under the rubble.
Time Frame: At the end of 4 week.
The scale for nursing interventions aimed at maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance in children trapped under rubble has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100. It is expected that the intervention group will score higher.
At the end of 4 week.
It is expected that the intervention group will have higher levels of self-confidence on the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making (NASC-CDM©) Scale.
Time Frame: At the end of 4 week.
The Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making (NASC-CDM©) Scale has a minimum score of 27 and a maximum score of 162. It is expected that the intervention group will have higher self-confidence scores.
At the end of 4 week.
It is expected that the intervention group will have lower anxiety levels on the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making (NASC-CDM©) Scale.
Time Frame: At the end of 4 week.
The Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making (NASC-CDM©) Scale has a minimum score of 27 and a maximum score of 162. It is expected that the intervention group will have lower anxiety scores.
At the end of 4 week.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Nursing Intervention

Subscribe