- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07506720
Early Mobilization Following Elective Spine Surgery: Trial of In-bed Cycling
Early Mobilization Following Elective Spine Surgery: Prospective Randomized Trial of In-bed Cycling on Postoperative Day 1
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if early mobilization using an in-bed cycling device can reduce the amount of time patients spend in bed after elective spine surgery in adults.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does in-bed cycling on the day after surgery reduce the amount of time patients spend in bed over the next 24 hours?
Does in-bed cycling reduce the length of hospital stay and improve participation during physiotherapy assessment?
Researchers will compare patients who receive an in-bed cycling session plus standard postoperative care to patients who receive standard postoperative care alone to see if early in-bed cycling improves mobility and recovery after spine surgery.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to either a standard care group or an in-bed cycling group
Wear a fitness tracker to measure activity levels and time spent in bed
Receive standard postoperative care
Complete a 30-minute in-bed cycling session on the day after surgery (intervention group only)
Be monitored for pain and vital signs during the study period
Undergo a physiotherapy assessment to evaluate mobility and participation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Here is a ClinicalTrials.gov-style Detailed Description written from your protocol. It is technical, structured, and avoids duplicating eligibility criteria or outcome tables while expanding beyond a brief summary.
Detailed Description
Early mobilization after surgery is recognized as a safe and effective strategy to reduce postoperative complications and functional decline. In patients undergoing spine surgery, early mobilization has been associated with shorter hospital stays, improved functional recovery, and fewer complications such as pneumonia, thromboembolism, and deconditioning. Despite these benefits, a large proportion of hospitalized patients remain in bed for most of their stay, particularly older adults. Barriers to mobilization include limited physiotherapy resources, patient fear of movement, and concerns among healthcare staff regarding safety.
In current practice, mobilization after elective spine surgery often depends on availability of physiotherapy services, which may be delayed until postoperative day 2 or 3. As a result, many patients remain inactive during the first postoperative day, a period that may be critical for preventing deconditioning. Interventions that enable safe, early, and resource-efficient mobilization are therefore needed.
In-bed cycling using a portable ergometer has been shown to be safe and feasible in critically ill patients, including those receiving mechanical ventilation. This approach allows active or assisted lower-limb movement without requiring the patient to stand or walk, thereby overcoming several common barriers to early mobilization. However, the effectiveness of in-bed cycling as a mobilization strategy has not previously been evaluated in patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
This study is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate whether a single session of in-bed cycling performed on postoperative day 1 reduces time spent in bed compared with standard postoperative care alone. Participants are randomized to either a control group receiving usual postoperative mobilization or an intervention group receiving usual care plus a supervised 30-minute in-bed cycling session on postoperative day 1.
All participants receive standard postoperative management, including assistance with transfer to a chair on postoperative day 1. Participants wear a wrist-based activity monitor continuously until postoperative day 2 to objectively quantify mobility and time spent in bed. Additional assessments include pain, fear of movement (kinesiophobia), and functional mobility tests. Physiotherapy assessments determining discharge readiness are conducted independently and blinded to group allocation.
For the intervention group, the in-bed cycling session is conducted under close supervision by trained research staff. Participants are positioned in semi-recumbent posture with appropriate monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation throughout the session. Cycling is performed in active or active-assisted mode, targeting a cadence of approximately 40 revolutions per minute, with gradual warm-up and cool-down phases. Pain and perceived exertion are assessed during the session, and predefined safety criteria allow immediate termination if physiological instability or patient discomfort occurs.
The primary aim of the trial is to determine whether early mobilization through in-bed cycling reduces time spent in bed during the 24 hours following the intervention. Secondary objectives include evaluating effects on hospital length of stay, functional mobility, kinesiophobia, and participation in physiotherapy. A short interim safety analysis is planned after the inclusion of an initial subset of participants to confirm tolerability and feasibility.
Data are collected using coded identifiers to ensure confidentiality. Activity monitor data are stored separately from clinical data to preserve blinding during analysis. Statistical analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle, with comparisons between groups performed using appropriate parametric tests. Multivariable analyses may be used to adjust for baseline differences if needed.
By introducing a simple, low-resource mobilization strategy early after surgery, this study aims to promote patient autonomy, reduce immobility, and potentially shorten hospital stays following elective spine surgery. If effective, in-bed cycling could represent a scalable and practical adjunct to standard postoperative care in spine surgery units.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, M.D. P.h.D
- Phone Number: (514) 338-2222
- Email: jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5
- Recruiting
- Montreal Sacred Heart Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong, M.D. P.h.D
- Phone Number: (514) 338-2222
- Email: jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Male or female ≥ 18 years old.
Postoperative #0 following elective spinal surgery: decompression with or without fusion, or fusion.
Patient able to walk independently before surgery (does not require assistance from another person and does not use a wheelchair).
Patient admitted directly from the operating room to the ward.
Hemodynamically stable:
Systolic blood pressure (SBP): ≥ 90 mmHg and < 140 mmHg
Oxygen saturation > 94%
Heart rate: 50-100 bpm
Patient approved for surgery after preoperative internal medicine evaluation.
Patient alert and conscious.
Valid informed consent obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
Non-ambulatory preoperatively.
Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m².
Acute neurological spinal trauma.
Non-neurological musculoskeletal impairment of the lower limbs (e.g., severe osteoarthritis, hip fracture, amputation) limiting the ability to pedal in bed.
Uncontrolled comorbidities preventing surgery or intervention (cardiovascular, respiratory, diabetes).
Expected hospital stay of less than 2 days after surgery.
Surgery-related complications: acute neurological deficit, dural tear, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, residual spinal instability.
Transfer to intensive care unit or hemodynamic instability.
Persistent hemodynamic instability: SBP < 90 mmHg or > 200 mmHg, oxygen saturation < 88%, heart rate < 50 or > 100 bpm, temperature > 38°C.
Capillary blood glucose outside target values: < 4.0 or > 7.0 mmol/L fasting or pre-meal, < 5.0 and > 10.0 mmol/L 2 hours post-meal.
Patient confused, disoriented, or agitated.
Patient already evaluated by physiotherapy for discharge planning or intensive functional rehabilitation.
Patient in isolation.
Patient already discharged.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard Postoperative Care
Participants in this arm receive usual postoperative care following elective spine surgery, including standard nursing care and routine assistance with mobilization according to institutional practice.
No in-bed cycling session is performed.
|
|
|
Experimental: Standard Postoperative Care plus In-Bed Cycling
Participants in this arm receive usual postoperative care following elective spine surgery plus a single supervised 30-minute in-bed cycling session on postoperative day 1.
Cycling is performed using a portable ergometer in active or active-assisted mode under continuous physiological monitoring.
|
Participants in this arm receive usual postoperative care following elective spine surgery plus a single supervised 30-minute in-bed cycling session on postoperative day 1.
Cycling is performed using a portable ergometer in active or active-assisted mode under continuous physiological monitoring.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time Spent in Bed
Time Frame: 24 hours starting immediately after the intervention on postoperative day 1 (assessed between postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2)
|
Total time spent in bed over a 24-hour period, measured objectively using a wrist-worn activity monitor with accelerometer and step-counting capabilities.
The device distinguishes time spent lying in bed from time spent active or walking.
This outcome reflects overall postoperative mobility and the effectiveness of early in-bed cycling as a mobilization strategy.
|
24 hours starting immediately after the intervention on postoperative day 1 (assessed between postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From day of surgery to hospital discharge. Average of 4 days.
|
Total duration of hospitalization in days from the date of surgery until hospital discharge.
|
From day of surgery to hospital discharge. Average of 4 days.
|
|
Functional Mobility
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
Functional mobility assessed using the Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test, which measures the time required to rise from a seated position to standing five consecutive times as quickly as possible.
Shorter completion time indicates better lower-limb function and mobility.
|
Postoperative day 1 (after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
|
Kinesiophobia (Fear of Movement)
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (before intervention and after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
Fear of movement assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (French Canadian validated version).
Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement.
|
Postoperative day 1 (before intervention and after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (before, during, and immediately after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10).
Pain is assessed at rest and during mobilization.
|
Postoperative day 1 (before, during, and immediately after intervention) and postoperative day 2
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: Throughout study completion. Average of 1 year.
|
Occurrence of medical or surgical complications during hospitalization, including cardiopulmonary instability, neurological deficit, infection, or other adverse events.
|
Throughout study completion. Average of 1 year.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Aug;52(8):1263-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52354.x.
- Epstein NE. A review article on the benefits of early mobilization following spinal surgery and other medical/surgical procedures. Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Apr 16;5(Suppl 3):S66-73. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.130674. eCollection 2014.
- Qvarfordh P, Olsen KS, Bendix T, Esbensen BA. Should patients walk from the postanesthesia care unit to the general ward after a lumbar discectomy? A randomized study. J Perianesth Nurs. 2014 Oct;29(5):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2013.10.006.
- Chakravarthy VB, Yokoi H, Coughlin DJ, Manlapaz MR, Krishnaney AA. Development and implementation of a comprehensive spine surgery enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18696.
- Burgess LC, Wainwright TW. What Is the Evidence for Early Mobilisation in Elective Spine Surgery? A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Jul 18;7(3):92. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7030092.
- Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):411-418. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16375. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
- Rupich K, Missimer E, O'Brien D, Shafer G, Wilensky EM, Pierce JT, Kerr M, Kallan MJ, Dolce D, Welch WC. The Benefits of Implementing an Early Mobility Protocol in Postoperative Neurosurgical Spine Patients. Am J Nurs. 2018 Jun;118(6):46-53. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000534851.58255.41.
- Leditschke IA, Green M, Irvine J, Bissett B, Mitchell IA. What are the barriers to mobilizing intensive care patients? Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012 Mar;23(1):26-9.
- Cattanach N, Sheedy R, Gill S, Hughes A. Physical activity levels and patients' expectations of physical activity during acute general medical admission. Intern Med J. 2014 May;44(5):501-4. doi: 10.1111/imj.12411.
- Brown CJ, Roth DL, Allman RM. Validation of use of wireless monitors to measure levels of mobility during hospitalization. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(4):551-8. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.06.0086.
- Anekwe DE, Koo KK, de Marchie M, Goldberg P, Jayaraman D, Spahija J. Interprofessional Survey of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients in Montreal, Canada. J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):218-226. doi: 10.1177/0885066617696846. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020 - 2002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spine
-
AO Innovation Translation CenterNot yet recruitingSpondylolisthesis | Spine Degeneration | Spine Fusion | Spine Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease | Nerve Root Compress;Lumbosac | Spine Disorder | Spine PainNetherlands
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingPain | Spine | Spine Surgery | Spine Fusion | Spine Surgery With Neuromonitoring | Spine Surgery With Motor Evoked Potential MonitoringUnited States
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsEnrolling by invitation
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterTerminatedLumbar Spine Surgeries | Cervical Spine SurgeriesUnited States
-
Podkarpackie Oncological CenterCompletedSpine Degeneration | Fusion of Spine (Disease)Poland
-
Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency CareCompletedSpine Fusion | Spine Fracture | Thoracic Spine Fracture | Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture | Lumbar; Spine, Fracture | Fracture of Spine, Level UnspecifiedRussia
-
K2M, Inc.Stryker SpineWithdrawnCervical Spine Injury | Thoracolumbar Spine
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedSpine Fusion for Degenerative Spine DiseaseFrance
-
Imperial College LondonImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Spine Degeneration | Spine Fusion | Navigation, Spatial
-
Peking University Third HospitalPUTH Beifang Hospital; PUTH Chongli Hospital; PUTH Qinhuangdao Hospital; PUTH Yanqing...RecruitingSpine Tumor | Spine Deformity | Spine Fracture | Degeneration SpineChina
Clinical Trials on Standard Postoperative Care plus In-Bed Cycling
-
McMaster UniversityCompleted
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationCompletedCritical Illness | Critical Illness Myopathy | Thoracic Surgery | Cardiac Disease | Critical Illness PolyneuropathyCanada
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalRecruitingCommunity-acquired PneumoniaDenmark
-
Saint Savvas Anticancer HospitalUnknownPostoperative Care | Intensive CareGreece
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedOld Age; DebilityUnited States
-
Copenhagen University Hospital at HerlevZealand University Hospital; University of Copenhagen; Bispebjerg Hospital; Herning... and other collaboratorsTerminatedEmergency Abdominal SurgeryDenmark
-
Göteborg UniversityCompletedMobilization | Intensive Care (ICU)Sweden
-
Silvia Ulrich SomainiKlinik BarmelweidRecruitingEccentric Cycling Exercise During Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiopulmonary DiseasesEccentric Exercise TrainingSwitzerland
-
Yale UniversityRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Fractures | Spine Degeneration | Hip ArthritisUnited States
-
Sharif Medical Research CenterCompleted