- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07508072
Comparison of High-Definition Electronic Magnifying Endoscopy With Image-Enhanced Technology Versus Colposcopy in the Detection of Cervical and Vaginal Lesions
Primary Objective:
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-definition electronic magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced technology versus colposcopy for cervical and vaginal lesions.
- Secondary Objectives:
To evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the two examination methods, and to assess the differences between the two techniques in image characteristics, such as lesion border clarity and visualization of microvascular structures.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
① Aged 18-65 years, with indications for colposcopy (HPV16/18 positive; HPV non-16/18 positive with LCT ≥ ASCUS; HPV negative with LCT ≥ LSIL; persistent HPV infection ≥ 1 year).
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
① Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Acute reproductive tract infection, severe coagulation disorders. ③ History of radiotherapy for malignant tumors, study participants with severe mental illness.
- Underage women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Group A
During the examination, traditional optical colposcopy (magnification: 7.5-15×) was first used for observation and image acquisition, followed by endoscopy (preset magnification: 90-120×).
|
High-definition magnifying endoscopy (100-150×) enables clear visualization of microvascular and mucosal structures.
In recent years, magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques (such as NBI/BLI/LCI) has established a well-developed vascular and epithelial interpretation system for the diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
The cervix, vagina, and esophagus share the same stratified squamous epithelium, and the pathological evolution of precancerous lesions and early cancer exhibits similarities.
Therefore, this technical framework may theoretically be transferable to the detection of lower genital tract lesions.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Group B
During the examination, endoscopy was performed first, followed by colposcopy.
|
High-definition magnifying endoscopy (100-150×) enables clear visualization of microvascular and mucosal structures.
In recent years, magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques (such as NBI/BLI/LCI) has established a well-developed vascular and epithelial interpretation system for the diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
The cervix, vagina, and esophagus share the same stratified squamous epithelium, and the pathological evolution of precancerous lesions and early cancer exhibits similarities.
Therefore, this technical framework may theoretically be transferable to the detection of lower genital tract lesions.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Sensitivity
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Specificity
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
|
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- [2026](045)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Disease
-
Centinel SpineAvaniaEnrolling by invitationDegenerative Disc Disease | Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease | Cervical Spine Degenerative Disc Disease | Cervical Spine Degenerative DiseaseGermany
-
NuVasiveEnrolling by invitationCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical Disc Disease | Cervical Spine Disease | Cervical Myelopathy | Cervical Spondylosis | Cervical Disc Herniation | Cervical StenosisUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) | Cervical Cage With Screw
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityWithdrawnCervical Disc Disease | Cervical Spine DiseaseTurkey
-
King Saud UniversityRecruitingCervical Degenerative DiseaseSaudi Arabia
-
Research SourceEnrolling by invitationCervical Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUnknownCervical Preinvasive DiseaseGermany
-
NYU Langone HealthCompleted