Comparison of High-Definition Electronic Magnifying Endoscopy With Image-Enhanced Technology Versus Colposcopy in the Detection of Cervical and Vaginal Lesions

March 27, 2026 updated by: Shengtao Zhou, West China Second University Hospital
  1. Primary Objective:

    To compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-definition electronic magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced technology versus colposcopy for cervical and vaginal lesions.

  2. Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the two examination methods, and to assess the differences between the two techniques in image characteristics, such as lesion border clarity and visualization of microvascular structures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ① Aged 18-65 years, with indications for colposcopy (HPV16/18 positive; HPV non-16/18 positive with LCT ≥ ASCUS; HPV negative with LCT ≥ LSIL; persistent HPV infection ≥ 1 year).

    • Voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ① Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

    • Acute reproductive tract infection, severe coagulation disorders. ③ History of radiotherapy for malignant tumors, study participants with severe mental illness.

      • Underage women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group A
During the examination, traditional optical colposcopy (magnification: 7.5-15×) was first used for observation and image acquisition, followed by endoscopy (preset magnification: 90-120×).
High-definition magnifying endoscopy (100-150×) enables clear visualization of microvascular and mucosal structures. In recent years, magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques (such as NBI/BLI/LCI) has established a well-developed vascular and epithelial interpretation system for the diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The cervix, vagina, and esophagus share the same stratified squamous epithelium, and the pathological evolution of precancerous lesions and early cancer exhibits similarities. Therefore, this technical framework may theoretically be transferable to the detection of lower genital tract lesions.
Other Names:
  • Traditional Colposcopy
Other: Group B
During the examination, endoscopy was performed first, followed by colposcopy.
High-definition magnifying endoscopy (100-150×) enables clear visualization of microvascular and mucosal structures. In recent years, magnifying endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques (such as NBI/BLI/LCI) has established a well-developed vascular and epithelial interpretation system for the diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The cervix, vagina, and esophagus share the same stratified squamous epithelium, and the pathological evolution of precancerous lesions and early cancer exhibits similarities. Therefore, this technical framework may theoretically be transferable to the detection of lower genital tract lesions.
Other Names:
  • Traditional Colposcopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Sensitivity
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Specificity
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.
At the time of issuing the histopathological report following biopsy, or at the time of follow-up (6-12 months) in cases where no biopsy was performed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 28, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 28, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Disease

Subscribe