Comparison of Early Pleural Irrigation Strategy With Saline to the Standard of Care for the Management of Complicated Pleural Infections. (EPISSOC)

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Early Pleural Irrigation Strategy With Saline to the Standard of Care for the Management of Complicated Pleural Infections.

Intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) is regarded by recent guidelines as a "rescue" therapy for managing complicated pleural infections; however, it is associated with significant side effects, including pleural bleeding, pain, and fever. Pleural irrigation with saline may serve as an alternative, yet evidence supporting its effectiveness is limited to a single small- scale, single-center randomized trial. The objective of the study is to compare the risk of treatment failure at 30 days (defined as a composite outcome that includes death, the need for thoracic surgery, or additional intrapleural enzyme therapy) between an early pleural irrigation strategy and standard care for complicated pleural infections.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

244

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Picardie
      • Amiens, Picardie, France, 80054
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Amiens Picardie
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe GUT-GOBERT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hugues MOREL, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frédéric GAGNADOUX, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elise NOELSAVINA, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Camille PIRIOU-GAROUTE, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gilles MANGIAPAN, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas FLAMENT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vincent DUCROCQ, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laure SEYER, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elise ARTAUD-MACARI, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ibrantina LUCENA, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marine GOSSET-WOIMANT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cherifa GOUNANE, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marion DESQUIENS, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles- Hugo MARQUETTE, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laure GOUBERT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nina DE MONTMOLLIN, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xavier DEMANT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vincent IOOS, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maxime FURSTENBERGER, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean MORIN, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Asaël BERGER, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antoine DUMAZET, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lidia PETIT, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean STAENTZEL, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years old) capable of fully understanding the study;
  • Complicated pleural infection (macroscopically purulent fluid, positive for bacteria on Gram's staining, positive on culture for bacterial infection, loculated effusion, pH <7.2, great abundance) leading to thoracic drainage;
  • Initial ultrasound evaluation to estimate pleural fluid abundance and detect fibrinous septation;
  • Social security affiliation
  • Written informed consent
  • Highly effective contraceptive methods for women of childbearing age include: Combined hormonal contraception (estrogen and progestogen) associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable); intrauterine device; hormone- releasing intrauterine system; bilateral occlusion of the Fallopian tubes; vasectomized partner; sexual abstinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tuberculous pleural effusions;
  • Previous treatment with intrapleural fibrinolytic agents (urokinase, streptokinase, alteplase, or DNase) or intrapleural saline lavage;
  • Previous thoracic surgery for pleural infection;
  • Contraindications to auxiliary treatments, to fibrinolysis or surgery as well as to procedures such as drainage and lavage;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Expected survival of less than 3 months;
  • Thoracic drainage since more than 24h;
  • Patient deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision or placed under judicial protection (guardianship or supervision);
  • Inability to give informed written consent;
  • Participation in another clinical trial;
  • Patient being a relative of the investigator or any member of the team directly involved in the study, including assistant physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and coordinators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intrapleural irrigation
Experimental group: 500 mL bags of 0.9% sodium chloride will be administered into the thoracic cavity via the chest tube using a three way tap and gravity (no infusion pump or pressure). The infusion is followed by free drainage with thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O). This process will occur twices daily for a total of 6 irrigations.
500 mL bags of 0.9% sodium chloride will be administered into the thoracic cavity via the chest tube using a three way tap and gravity (no infusion pump or pressure). The infusion is followed by free drainage with thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O). This process will occur two times daily for a total of 6 irrigations.
Active Comparator: standard care
Control group: Standard care includes pleural drainage with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride flushes administered twice daily for 3 days to maintain tube patency. Thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O) will be applied to chest tubes.
Standard care includes pleural drainage with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride flushes administered two times daily for 3 days to maintain tube patency. Thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O) will be applied to chest tubes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of treatment failure
Time Frame: at 30 days
Treatment failure, defined as a composite outcome that includes death, the need for thoracic surgery, or additional intrapleural enzyme therapy. This criterion will be assessed at 30 days.
at 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of pleural fluid drained from randomization
Time Frame: at day 3
Volume of pleural fluid drained from randomization to day 3
at day 3
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: at 90 days
Incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events, including fever, allergic reactions, bleeding, and chest tube obstruction
at 90 days
Intra-hospital mortality
Time Frame: at 30 days
at 30 days
Intra-hospital mortality
Time Frame: at 90 days
at 90 days
Rate of thoracic surgery
Time Frame: at 30 days
Rate of thoracic surgery
at 30 days
Rate of additional intrapleural enzyme therapy
Time Frame: at 30 days
Rate of additional intrapleural enzyme therapy
at 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: at 90 days
Length of hospital stay
at 90 days
Change in the area of pleural opacity
Time Frame: at day 3
Change in the area of pleural opacity, measured as the percentage of the ipsilateral hemithorax occupied by effusion on chest radiography from randomization to day 3;
at day 3
Presence of a restrictive ventilatory defect
Time Frame: at day 90
Presence of a restrictive ventilatory defect, defined as total lung capacity < 80% of predicted values
at day 90
Assessment of pain using a numeric pain scale
Time Frame: at 90 days
Assessment of pain using a numeric pain scale
at 90 days
valuation of the prognostic performance of the RAPID score
Time Frame: at day 0
valuation of the prognostic performance of the RAPID score
at day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Therapy

Clinical Trials on Standard care

3
Subscribe