Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Operace infekční endokarditidy s použitím konvenčních protetických chlopní versus kryokonzervovaný aortální homograft (IESCOPHO)

27. září 2026 aktualizováno: Francesco Nappi, Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Kryokonzervovaný aortální homograft versus konvenční protetické chlopně pro infekční endokarditidu zahrnující aortální chlopeň: analýza odpovídající skóre sklonu

: Evidence suggested that autologous or allogeneic tissue is more suitable to synthetic material in an infected field. Given the unwillingness of some surgeons to use artificial foreign materials, such as conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses, cryopreserved aortic homografts (CAH) have been recommended revealing favorable outcomes in aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) surgery (1-5). This aspect is even more evident in cases involving prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and other complex and aggressive lesions involving the aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa with abscess formation. However, most of these reports are fixed on single-arm observational studies without comparing CAH with conventional prostheses.

The key question of this study is to establish the difference in treatment failure (death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation), all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure during follow-up (structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis) in patients who received the CAH vs conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses for aortic valve replacement (AVR) secondary to infective endocarditis (IE)

Přehled studie

Detailní popis

The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve endocarditis at risk of embolization, heart failure and uncontrolled infection undergoing AVR with the use of CAH or conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for the treatment of infection, LV dysfunction and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.

Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with CAH, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of mechanical prostheses.

Typ studie

Pozorovací

Zápis (Odhadovaný)

760

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

    • France
      • Saint-Denis, France, Francie, 93200
        • Francesco Nappi

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

18 let až 90 let (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu

Všechno

Metoda odběru vzorků

Ukázka pravděpodobnosti

Studijní populace

Adults with aortic valve endocarditis with or without infection extending to other heart structures who were symptomatic of congestive heart failure and unresponsive to medical therapy and who were eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement. The severity of AMR was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, performed using the European Society of Echocardiography criteria.

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Duke Criteria
  • Uncontrolled Infection Local abscess Large vegetation False aneurysm, Fistula, Dehiscence of PV
  • Embolism Large vegetation >10mm, persistent infection
  • Heart Failure Involvement of aortic root, intervalvular fibrosa, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Pediatric
  • Any echocardiographic evidence of absence of IE

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Observační modely: COHORT
  • Časové perspektivy: PROSPECTIVE

Kohorty a intervence

Skupina / kohorta
Intervence / Léčba
Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Include patients who received CAH for native (NVE) or prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE).

The CAH are implanted using miniroot procedure. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. Aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa).

Use of homograft in first time aortic valve replacement for IE decreased over time (9,4% to 5,6%) and in reoperation (37,5% to 28,5%) in a report from STS database between 2005-2011 (6). Nevertheless, the homograft was used more often in reoperations than in primary interventions (32.2% vs 7.0%, p < 0.0001) in both valve replacements (14,6%) and for root replacements (53,2%) (6).

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
Stented/Non stented xenograft

Stented/Non stented xenograft may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. The use of biological valves increased from 57% to 67% for primary the operation during which the use of mechanical valves decreased from 30% to 24%. For reoperations, the use of biologic valves increased from 38% to 52% compared to the warning use of mechanical valves from 20% to 17%. A homograft was used in only 2.5% of valve replacements, while a biological valve was used in 68.7% of the cases. This trend is reversed both in NVE and PVE the aortic root was involved (6). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional stented /non stented xenograft are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE.

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
Mechanical valve prostheses

Mechanical prostheses may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Prior to 2000, mechanical valves were used in 50% of patients compared to 14% since 2009. Analysis of the STS Database (6) showed that from 2005 to 2011 a progressive shift in favour of biological valves both as the primary operation (NVE) (73%) and in the reoperation (PVE) (27%) compared to mechanical prosthesis. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional mechanical prostheses are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda
  • Postup emicommando

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Ostatní jména:
  • Výměna kořene
  • Postup komanda

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Treatment failure
Časové okno: 10 years]

The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation

10 years]

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Overall Mortality
Časové okno: 10 years

The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality

10 years
Cardiac Death
Časové okno: 10 years

The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death

10 years
Non Cardiac Death
Časové okno: 10 years

The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death

10 years
Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF)
Časové okno: 10 years

The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis

10 years
Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
Časové okno: 10 years

Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization.

10 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF)
Časové okno: 10 years

Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction

10 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (recurrence)
Časové okno: 10 years

Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention

10 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD)
Časové okno: 10 years

Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter

10 years
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (Aortic Root diameter)
Časové okno: 10 years

Changes from baseline aortic root diameter

10 years

Další výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Treatment failure
Časové okno: 10 years

The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation

10 years
A comparison of the incidence of reinfection in allogeneic substitutes and xenograft bioprostheses
Časové okno: 10 years

New tracers may improve diagnostic accuracy, especially for high-risk patients.¹ Antibiotics target bacteria, making them excellent candidates for molecular imaging. The aim of this study is to identify new, selective radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT applications.

10 years
To assess the occurrence of reinfection in allogeneic substitutes and mechanical prostheses.
Časové okno: 10 years

A model was used to predict how a tracer would move across a tissue sample. The model included several types of movement, like convection, diffusion, binding to bacteria, and vascular washout. The model also included spatial variations in bacterial density, tissue permeability, and perfusion to estimate how much of the tracer would penetrate the tissue, how much would be retained, and how much would be in the background. The effects of diffusion, binding affinity, and clearance on the predicted tracer distribution were evaluated.

10 years

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Francesco Nappi, MD, Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Obecné publikace

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Aktuální)

1. ledna 2005

Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)

30. března 2027

Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)

1. prosince 2028

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

14. února 2022

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

14. února 2022

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

23. února 2022

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

30. září 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

27. září 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. září 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • CN-21-24

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Předplatit