Chirurgia dell'endocardite infettiva con l'uso di valvole protesiche convenzionali rispetto all'omoinnesto aortico criopreservato (IESCOPHO)
Omoinnesto aortico criopreservato rispetto a valvole protesiche convenzionali per l'endocardite infettiva che coinvolge la valvola aortica: un'analisi abbinata del punteggio di propensione
: Evidence suggested that autologous or allogeneic tissue is more suitable to synthetic material in an infected field. Given the unwillingness of some surgeons to use artificial foreign materials, such as conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses, cryopreserved aortic homografts (CAH) have been recommended revealing favorable outcomes in aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) surgery (1-5). This aspect is even more evident in cases involving prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and other complex and aggressive lesions involving the aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa with abscess formation. However, most of these reports are fixed on single-arm observational studies without comparing CAH with conventional prostheses.
The key question of this study is to establish the difference in treatment failure (death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation), all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure during follow-up (structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis) in patients who received the CAH vs conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses for aortic valve replacement (AVR) secondary to infective endocarditis (IE)
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve endocarditis at risk of embolization, heart failure and uncontrolled infection undergoing AVR with the use of CAH or conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for the treatment of infection, LV dysfunction and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.
Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with CAH, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of mechanical prostheses.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Stimato)
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
France
-
Saint-Denis, France, Francia, 93200
- Francesco Nappi
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Adults with aortic valve endocarditis with or without infection extending to other heart structures who were symptomatic of congestive heart failure and unresponsive to medical therapy and who were eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement. The severity of AMR was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, performed using the European Society of Echocardiography criteria.
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Duke Criteria
- Uncontrolled Infection Local abscess Large vegetation False aneurysm, Fistula, Dehiscence of PV
- Embolism Large vegetation >10mm, persistent infection
- Heart Failure Involvement of aortic root, intervalvular fibrosa, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock
Exclusion Criteria :
- Pediatric
- Any echocardiographic evidence of absence of IE
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Modelli osservazionali: COHORT
- Prospettive temporali: PROSPECTIVE
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft
Include patients who received CAH for native (NVE) or prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The CAH are implanted using miniroot procedure. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. Aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa). Use of homograft in first time aortic valve replacement for IE decreased over time (9,4% to 5,6%) and in reoperation (37,5% to 28,5%) in a report from STS database between 2005-2011 (6). Nevertheless, the homograft was used more often in reoperations than in primary interventions (32.2% vs 7.0%, p < 0.0001) in both valve replacements (14,6%) and for root replacements (53,2%) (6). |
CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure
Altri nomi:
The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
|
|
Stented/Non stented xenograft
Stented/Non stented xenograft may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. The use of biological valves increased from 57% to 67% for primary the operation during which the use of mechanical valves decreased from 30% to 24%. For reoperations, the use of biologic valves increased from 38% to 52% compared to the warning use of mechanical valves from 20% to 17%. A homograft was used in only 2.5% of valve replacements, while a biological valve was used in 68.7% of the cases. This trend is reversed both in NVE and PVE the aortic root was involved (6). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional stented /non stented xenograft are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE. |
CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure
Altri nomi:
The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
|
|
Mechanical valve prostheses
Mechanical prostheses may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Prior to 2000, mechanical valves were used in 50% of patients compared to 14% since 2009. Analysis of the STS Database (6) showed that from 2005 to 2011 a progressive shift in favour of biological valves both as the primary operation (NVE) (73%) and in the reoperation (PVE) (27%) compared to mechanical prosthesis. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional mechanical prostheses are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE |
CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure
Altri nomi:
The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience
Altri nomi:
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment failure
Lasso di tempo: 10 years]
|
The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation |
10 years]
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Mortality
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality |
10 years
|
|
Cardiac Death
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death |
10 years
|
|
Non Cardiac Death
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death |
10 years
|
|
Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis |
10 years
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization. |
10 years
|
|
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction |
10 years
|
|
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (recurrence)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention |
10 years
|
|
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter |
10 years
|
|
Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (Aortic Root diameter)
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
Changes from baseline aortic root diameter |
10 years
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment failure
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation |
10 years
|
|
A comparison of the incidence of reinfection in allogeneic substitutes and xenograft bioprostheses
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
New tracers may improve diagnostic accuracy, especially for high-risk patients.¹ Antibiotics target bacteria, making them excellent candidates for molecular imaging. The aim of this study is to identify new, selective radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT applications. |
10 years
|
|
To assess the occurrence of reinfection in allogeneic substitutes and mechanical prostheses.
Lasso di tempo: 10 years
|
A model was used to predict how a tracer would move across a tissue sample. The model included several types of movement, like convection, diffusion, binding to bacteria, and vascular washout. The model also included spatial variations in bacterial density, tissue permeability, and perfusion to estimate how much of the tracer would penetrate the tissue, how much would be retained, and how much would be in the background. The effects of diffusion, binding affinity, and clearance on the predicted tracer distribution were evaluated. |
10 years
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Francesco Nappi, MD, Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Nappi F, Nenna A, Petitti T, Spadaccio C, Gambardella I, Lusini M, Chello M, Acar C. Long-term outcome of cryopreserved allograft for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1357-1365.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.040. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
- Olivito S, Lalande S, Nappi F, Hammoudi N, D'Alessandro C, Fouret P, Acar C. Structural deterioration of the cryopreserved mitral homograft valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):313-20, 320.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
- Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Dreyfus J, Attias D, Acar C, Bando K. Mitral endocarditis: A new management framework. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1486-1495.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.159. Epub 2018 Apr 13. No abstract available.
- Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Acar C. Use of allogeneic tissue to treat infective valvular disease: Has everything been said? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Oct 24. No abstract available.
- Kim JB, Ejiofor JI, Yammine M, Camuso JM, Walsh CW, Ando M, Melnitchouk SI, Rawn JD, Leacche M, MacGillivray TE, Cohn LH, Byrne JG, Sundt TM. Are homografts superior to conventional prosthetic valves in the setting of infective endocarditis involving the aortic valve? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1239-46, 1248.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.061. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
- Sabik JF, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Marullo AG, Pettersson GB, Cosgrove DM. Aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allograft for prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):650-9; discussion 659. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03779-7.
- Savage EB, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Asher CR, Brennan JM, Gammie JS. Outcomes and prosthesis choice for active aortic valve infective endocarditis: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):806-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
- Nappi F, Asta L, Garufi L, Avtaar Singh SS, Benedetto U, Acar C, Fiore A. Infective endocarditis surgery using conventional prosthetic valves versus homograft: the IESCOPO study protocol. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2026 Apr 30;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13019-026-04088-8.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Stimato)
Completamento dello studio (Stimato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- CN-21-24
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .