Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Et klinisk forsøg for at vurdere sikkerheden og anti-caries-effektiviteten af ​​COL 101 (arginin) non-fluorid tandplejemidler i sammenligning med 0,24 % natriumfluorid (1100 ppm F) tandplejemiddelkontrol hos 10 til 14-årige børn

20. juli 2026 opdateret af: Colgate Palmolive

Et fase 2 randomiseret, dobbeltblindt, aktivt kontrolleret multicenter klinisk forsøg for at vurdere sikkerheden og anticarieseffektiviteten af ​​COL 101 (arginin) non-fluorid tandplejemidler med 1,5 %, 4,0 % og 8,0 % arginin hver i sammenligning Med 0,24 % natriumfluorid (1100 ppm F) tandplejemiddelkontrol hos 10 til 14-årige børn

Formålet med denne undersøgelse er at vurdere sikkerheden og at evaluere anti-caries-effektiviteten af ​​COL101 (arginin) non-fluorid tandplejemidler sammenlignet med et 0,24 % natriumfluorid tandplejemiddel hos 10-14-årige børn over en periode på et år.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Afsluttet

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled multi-center study, 2025 subjects were randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 into one of four parallel study groups (1.5% arginine dentifrice, 4.0% arginine dentifrice, 8.0% arginine dentifrice or 0.24% NaF dentifrice with no arginine). Subjects were asked to brush their teeth twice daily at home (unsupervised use) with the assigned dentifrice for a duration of 1 year. Measurements for efficacy, safety and assessment of product use compliance were conducted at baseline, 6 months (±1 month) and 1 year (±1 month). Additional safety evaluations including evaluation of oral soft and hard tissues, as well as product use compliance assessment was performed at 3 months and 9 months (±1 month). All subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs) during the course of the study.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
2025

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Fase 2

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, Forenede Stater, 92350
        • Loma Linda University School of Dentistry
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, Forenede Stater, 32610
        • University of Florida College of Dentistry
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, Forenede Stater, 46202-2876
        • Indiana University School of Dentistry
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02111
        • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02142
        • The Forsyth Institute
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, Forenede Stater, 14214
        • University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 19104-6003
        • University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, Forenede Stater, 78229-3900
        • UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry
  • Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico
        • University of Puerto Rico School of Dental Medicine

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

10 år til 14 år (Barn)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inklusionskriterier:

  • Emner, der opfylder alle kriterier nedenfor, vil blive inkluderet i undersøgelsen:

    1. Emnets samtykke og informeret samtykke fra forældre/værge til frivillig deltagelse.
    2. Vilje og evne til at bruge de tildelte produkter i henhold til instruktionerne, tilgængelighed til alle aftaler og sandsynlighed for at gennemføre det kliniske forsøg.
    3. Børn i alderen 10-14 år ved baseline.
    4. Tilstedeværelse af permanente sekundære kindtænder eller tegn på, at mindst én permanent anden kindtand er udbrudt, som angivet ved cuspalbrud gennem slimhinden.
    5. Godt generelt helbred, som det fremgår af en gennemgang af sygehistorien.
    6. Forsøgspersoner, som ved studiestart har vist to eller flere aktive carieslæsioner (ICDAS-score på 2 eller mere) i permanente tænder og tidligere carieserfaring (DMFT >1), D= Decayed er defineret som ICDAS-score på 3 eller derover

Ekskluderingskriterier:

  • Emner, der præsenterer et af nedenstående kriterier, vil blive udelukket fra undersøgelsen:

    1. Tilstedeværelse af fast eller aftageligt proteseapparat eller ortodontisk behandling, der involverer mere end fire permanente tænder.

    2. Brug af medicin, der kan øge risikoen for udvikling af tandkaries, dvs.

      medicin, der reducerer spytstrømmen og dem med højt sukkerindhold.

    3. Langvarig antibiotikabehandling.
    4. Børn med en bekræftet diagnose af kognitiv og/eller motorisk svækkelse.
    5. Alvorlig malocclusion.
    6. Forsøgspersoner, der ved studiestart har til stede svær caries (ICDAS 5 eller 6) på fem eller flere permanente tænder.
    7. Bevis på moderat til svær paradentose.
    8. Deltagelse i enhver anden klinisk undersøgelse inden for de 30 dage forud for starten af ​​den kliniske undersøgelse.
    9. Kendt historie med allergier eller andre negative reaktioner på arginin eller mundplejeprodukter eller deres ingredienser.
    10. Selvrapporteret historie om at være aktuelt gravid, påtænke at blive gravid i løbet af prøveperioden eller amning.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Firedobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Aktiv komparator: 0,24% natriumfluorid tandplejemiddel
Tandpasta
Medicin: 0,24% natriumfluorid tandplejemiddel
Børstning af hele munden med tandpasta 2 gange om dagen i 2 minutter hver gang i hele undersøgelsens varighed
Eksperimentel: 1,5% arginin tandplejemiddel
Tandpasta
Medicin: 1,5% arginin tandplejemiddel
Børstning af hele munden med tandpasta 2 gange om dagen i 2 minutter hver gang i hele undersøgelsens varighed
Eksperimentel: 4,0% arginin tandplejemiddel
Tandpasta
Medicin: 4,0% arginin tandplejemiddel
Børstning af hele munden med tandpasta 2 gange om dagen i 2 minutter hver gang i hele undersøgelsens varighed
Eksperimentel: 8,0% arginin tandplejemiddel
Tandpasta
Medicin: 8,0% arginin tandplejemiddel
Børstning af hele munden med tandpasta 2 gange om dagen i 2 minutter hver gang i hele undersøgelsens varighed

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) Score Between the Month 6 and Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Surfaces (DMFS) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of scorable tooth surfaces among the up to 128 examined surfaces in the subject's mouth that were determined by the examiner to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 128, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFS is defined as the change in DMFS score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points calculated by subtraction.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Incremental Subject-wise Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) Score Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The Decayed Missing or Filled Teeth (DMFT) score is a measure of the extent of dental caries for a subject, defined as the number of the up to 28 examined teeth in the subject's mouth on which the examiner determined at least one surface to be decayed, missing, or filled. This score can range between 0 and 28, with higher values indicating a greater level of disease (i.e., worse condition). The Incremental DMFT is defined as the change in DMFT score between two examinations performed at specified time points, calculated by subtraction.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Severity Score Progressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 2 or higher; from a score of 1 or 2 to a score of 3 or higher; or from a score of 3 or 4 to a score of 5 or 6. Surfaces with scores between 0 and 4 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries severity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries progression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Severity Score Regressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries severity score is a parameter that reports the level of dental caries on each tooth surface using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores are worse. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score severity score regression on a tooth surface is defined as an improvement from a score of 2 or higher to a score of 0 or 1. Tooth surfaces for which the earlier score was between 2 and 6 are defined as being at risk for caries severity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries severity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries regression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Progressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score progression is defined as a worsening from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Surfaces with a score of 0 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity progression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity progression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity progression was calculated.
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 6 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 6 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Baseline and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated.
Between the Baseline and the Month 12 visits
Subject-wise Tallies of Clinically Significant International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Caries Activity Regressions Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 Visits
Tidsramme: Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits
The ICDAS caries activity score is a parameter that reports the presence of active dental caries on a tooth surface utilizing a binary categorical scale of 0 (no active caries present) or 1 (active caries present). A score of 0 is the more favorable outcome. When considering the time frame between two specified examinations, a clinically significant score regression is defined as an improvement from a score of 1 to a score of 0. Surfaces with a score of 1 at the earlier examination are defined as being at risk for caries activity regression. For each subject, the number of at-risk tooth surfaces was recorded, as well as the number of those at-risk surfaces that presented a clinically significant caries activity regression between the two examinations. For each treatment group, the mean of the subject-wise percentages of at-risk surfaces exhibiting a clinically significant caries activity regression was calculated
Between the Month 6 and the Month 12 visits

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Colgate Palmolive

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Studieleder: Maria E Ryan, DDS PhD, Colgate-Palmolive Company

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
21. januar 2021

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
28. februar 2024

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
28. februar 2024

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
8. februar 2021

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
10. februar 2021

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
11. februar 2021

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
21. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
20. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. juli 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • CRO-2020-CAR-ARG-ED

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ja

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger