Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

En undersøgelse af TAK-411 hos voksne med kronisk inflammatorisk demyeliniserende polyradiculoneuropati (CIDP) (CASCA)

30. oktober 2026 opdateret af: Takeda

En fase 2, open-label, proof-of-concept-undersøgelse for at undersøge effektiviteten, sikkerheden og tolerabiliteten af ​​TAK-411 hos voksne personer med kronisk inflammatorisk demyeliniserende polyradiculoneuropati (Casca-undersøgelsen)

CIDP is an autoimmune disease. This means that the body's germ fighting (immune) system attacks itself. In CIDP, the immune system attacks the protective covering around the nerves called myelin. Over time, these nerves lose their ability to send signals to the muscles in the body. This leads to muscle weakness and loss of sensation in arms and legs among other symptoms. Participants with CIDP can be treated with a protein called immunoglobulin (or IG).

TAK-411 is a special type of immune globulin G (hsIgG) that has been chemically changed. It is made from IG that comes from human plasma. This study will test if TAK-411 can decrease inflammation and improve symptoms of CIDP.

The main aim of this study is to check how TAK-411 affects the physical functioning of adults with CIDP when compared with results of the placebo group of a historical trial.

Participants may be treated with TAK-411 for up to 1 year (51 weeks) and will be followed up for 3 weeks after last dose.

During the study, participants may visit their study clinic up to approximately 21 times.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Rekruttering

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
36

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Fase 2

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiekontakt

Navn og kontaktoplysninger for den person, der kan besvare spørgsmål om tilmelding til en klinisk undersøgelse. Hvert sted, hvor undersøgelsen udføres, kan også have en specifik kontaktperson, som kan være bedre i stand til at besvare disse spørgsmål.

Studiesteder

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • Rekruttering
        • University of Calgary
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Christopher White
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • Rekruttering
        • University Health Network
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Hans Katzberg
  • Colombia
      • Bogotá, Colombia, 111711
      • Bucaramanga, Colombia, 680001
        • Rekruttering
        • Fundacion Oftalmologica de Santander - FOSCAL
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Ivan Peña
    • Antioquia
      • Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia, 50021
        • Rekruttering
        • Neuro ClinicaS.A.S
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Juan Marcos Solano Atehortua
    • D.C.
      • Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
        • Rekruttering
        • Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Alba Lucia Marentes Cubillos
    • Valle del Cauca Department
      • Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia, 760032
        • Rekruttering
        • Fundacion Valle del Lili
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Francisco Arias Mora
  • Forenede Stater
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, Forenede Stater, 92093
        • Rekruttering
        • University of California San Diego
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Dominic Ferrey
      • San Francisco, California, Forenede Stater, 94109
        • Rekruttering
        • California Pacific Medical Center
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Liberty Jenkins
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Forenede Stater, 20017
        • Rekruttering
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Noushin Jazebi
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, Forenede Stater, 32209
        • Rekruttering
        • UF Health Neurology - Jacksonville
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Michael Pulley
      • Miami, Florida, Forenede Stater, 33133
        • Rekruttering
        • Visionary Investigators Network
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Andrew Lerman
        • Kontakt:
      • Rockledge, Florida, Forenede Stater, 32955
        • Rekruttering
        • Knight Neurology
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Vaibhav Shah
        • Kontakt:
      • Tampa, Florida, Forenede Stater, 33612
        • Rekruttering
        • University of South Florida
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Kathleen Murray
        • Kontakt:
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Forenede Stater, 30322
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02215
        • Rekruttering
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Fernanda Wajnsztajn Yungher
        • Kontakt:
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Forenede Stater, 55905
        • Rekruttering
        • Mayo Clinic Rochester
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Marcus Pinto
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, Forenede Stater, 65212-0001
        • Rekruttering
        • The Curators of the University of Missouri on behalf of University of Missouri Health Care
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • William Arnold
        • Kontakt:
      • St Louis, Missouri, Forenede Stater, 63110
        • Rekruttering
        • The Washington University
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Charles Roach
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, Forenede Stater, 27607
        • Rekruttering
        • Velocity Clinical Research - Raleigh
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Timothy Ryan
        • Kontakt:
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 19104
        • Rekruttering
        • Penn Blood Disorders Program - Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Chafic Karam
        • Kontakt:
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forenede Stater, 98195
        • Rekruttering
        • University of Washington
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Michael Weiss

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Key Inclusion Criteria

  1. The participant is at least 18 years of age, inclusive, at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

  2. The participant has a body weight of less than or equal to (<=) 150 kilogram (kg).

  3. The participant has a documented diagnosis of typical CIDP, as confirmed by a neurologist specializing/experienced in neuromuscular diseases and consistent with the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 criteria.

  4. The participant has responded to IgG treatment in the past (documented partial or complete resolution of neurological symptoms and deficits).

  5. The participant has had disease activation within 24 months before screening, as documented in medical records and in the opinion of the investigator, defined as one of the following:

    1. Clinically meaningful deterioration of symptoms on interruption or dose reduction of IgG treatment.
    2. Clinically meaningful deterioration of symptoms requiring IgG treatment dose increase with subsequent clinical improvement.
    3. Clinically meaningful deterioration of symptoms at the end of IgG treatment dose interval with improvement after next dose administration.

  6. The participant is on a stable dose of immunoglobulin treatment intravenously (IGIV) treatment, (within the dose range of 0.4 to 2.4 grams per kilogram [g/kg] every 2 to 6 weeks [inclusive]). A stable dose is defined as no change greater than 10 percentage (%) in frequency or dose of IGIV therapy within the 3 months before and throughout screening.

  7. The participant has an INCAT score between 0 and 7 (inclusive) at screening.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  1. The participant has a documented diagnosis of a CIDP variant per EAN/PNS 2021 criteria.

  2. The participant has any neuropathy of other causes, including the following:

    1. Hereditary demyelinating neuropathies, such as hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies.
    2. Neuropathies secondary to infections, disorders, or systemic diseases such as Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease), diphtheria, systemic lupus erythematosus, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes) syndrome, osteosclerotic myeloma, diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, lymphoma, amyloidosis.
    3. Multifocal motor neuropathy.
    4. Drug-, biologic-, chemotherapy-, or toxin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
    5. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

  3. The participant has any chronic or debilitating disease, or central nervous disorder that causes neurological symptoms or that may interfere with assessment of CIDP or outcome measures, including (but not limited to) multiple sclerosis, arthritis, stroke, and Parkinson's disease.

  4. The participant is required to take or has taken either of the following for treatment of CIDP:

    1. Immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive agents (except IGIV) that include, but are not limited to, complement inhibitors, efgartigimod, and chemotherapeutic drugs, within 3 months or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of screening.
    2. B-cell affecting biologics (e.g. rituximab) within 6 months of screening.

    Note: Participants on a long-term, stable dosing regimen of certain immunomodulatory agents (eg, hydroxychloroquine) for any disease other than CIDP may be eligible, provided the dose regimen has been stable for 3 months before screening and is expected to remain stable throughout the study.

  5. The participant has undergone plasma exchange within 3 months of screening.

  6. The participant has a history of malignancy with less than 2 years of complete remission before screening, or active malignancy requiring chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

    Note: Participants with adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or stable prostate cancer not requiring treatment are eligible.

  7. The participant has experienced deep vein thrombosis or arterial thromboembolic events (example, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism) within 12 months of screening.

  8. The participant has any medical condition, laboratory finding, or physical examination finding that precludes participation or with clinical evidence of any significant acute or chronic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with successful completion of the study or place the participant at undue medical risk.

  9. The participant has participated in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device within 30 days before screening or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: TAK-411

Participants will receive TAK-411 400 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), IV infusion as an induction dose on Day 1 of initial treatment period. The induction dose may be repeated once after 3 weeks if participants exhibit no clinical change. Thereafter, participants will receive TAK-411 200 mg/kg, IV infusion every 3 weeks for a total of 24 weeks (initial treatment period), followed by an optional additional 27 weeks (extended treatment period).
Biologisk: TAK-411

TAK-411 IV infusion.

Andre navne:
  • Hypersialyleret immun globulin g

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Number of Participants With Improvement in Functional Ability at Week 24
Tidsramme: At Week 24

Improvement in functional ability is defined as decrease of >=1 point in INCAT score at Week 24 compared with baseline (last assessment before first investigational product [IP] administration on Day 1). INCAT disability scale consists of upper and lower extremity components, which are scored based on a participant's level of impairment/disability in their arms and legs, respectively. Each component is scored from 0 to 5 points, which are summed for an overall INCAT disability score ranging from 0 to 10 points, where a score of 0 indicates no signs of disability (example, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and a score of 10 indicates most severe disability (example, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to a wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). Adjusted INCAT disability score remains identical to INCAT disability score, except that changes in upper limb function from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) are excluded.
At Week 24

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Antal deltagere med behandling af bivirkninger
Tidsramme: Fra start af undersøgelsesmedicinsk administration op til 54 uger
Fra start af undersøgelsesmedicinsk administration op til 54 uger
Antal deltagere med infusionsopbrud, afbrydelser og reduktion af infusionshastighed på grund af TAK-411-relaterede TEAE'er
Tidsramme: Fra start af undersøgelsesmedicinsk administration op til 54 uger
Fra start af undersøgelsesmedicinsk administration op til 54 uger
Antal deltagere med antistoffer mod værtscelleproteiner (HCP), beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase (B4GALT1) og alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6GAL1)
Tidsramme: Op til 54 uger
Op til 54 uger
Number of Participants With Improvement in Functional Ability at Weeks 12 and 54
Tidsramme: At 12 and 54 weeks

Improvement in functional ability is defined as decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted INCAT score at 12 and 54 weeks compared with baseline (last assessment before first IP administration on Day 1). INCAT disability scale consists of upper and lower extremity components, which are scored based on a participant's level of impairment/disability in their arms and legs, respectively. Each component is scored from 0 to 5 points, which are summed for an overall INCAT disability score ranging from 0 to 10 points, where a score of 0 indicates no signs of disability (example, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and a score of 10 indicates most severe disability (example, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to a wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). Adjusted INCAT disability score remains identical to INCAT disability score, except that changes in upper limb function from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) are excluded.
At 12 and 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

INCAT disability scale consists of upper and lower extremity components, which are scored based on a participant's level of impairment/disability in their arms and legs, respectively. Each component is scored from 0 to 5 points, which are summed for an overall INCAT disability score ranging from 0 to 10 points, where a score of 0 indicates no signs of disability (example, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and a score of 10 indicates most severe disability (example, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to a wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). Adjusted INCAT disability score remains identical to INCAT disability score, except that changes in upper limb function from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) are excluded.
Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Screening in the Adjusted INCAT Score
Tidsramme: Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

INCAT disability scale consists of upper and lower extremity components, which are scored based on a participant's level of impairment/disability in their arms and legs, respectively. Each component is scored from 0 to 5 points, which are summed for an overall INCAT disability score ranging from 0 to 10 points, where a score of 0 indicates no signs of disability (example, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and a score of 10 indicates most severe disability (example, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to a wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help). Adjusted INCAT disability score remains identical to INCAT disability score, except that changes in upper limb function from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) are excluded.
Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Number of Participants With Improvement in Functional Ability on Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) Score
Tidsramme: At 12, 24 and 54 weeks

Improvement in functional ability defined as increase of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points in the raw summed I-RODS score at 12, 24, and 54 weeks compared with baseline. I-RODS is a validated, participants-reported, linearly weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture current activity and social participation limitations in participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. I-RODS comprises 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The participant assigns a score between 0 and 2 to each item as follows:0 (impossible to perform),1 (performed with difficulty), 2 (easily performed) with a lower score indicating more severe activity and social participation limitations. A total I-RODS score of 0 (complete disability) to 48 (no disability) is tabulated by totalling the 24-item responses where higher score represents better outcomes.
At 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in I-RODS Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

The I-RODS is a validated, participants-reported, linearly weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture current activity and social participation limitations in participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The I-RODS comprises 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The participant assigns a score between 0 and 2 to each item as follows: 0 (impossible to perform), 1 (performed with difficulty), 2 (easily performed) with a lower score indicating more severe activity and social participation limitations. A total I-RODS score of 0 (complete disability) to 48 (no disability) is tabulated by totalling the 24-item responses where higher score represents better outcomes.
Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Screening in I-RODS Score
Tidsramme: Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

The I-RODS is a validated, participants-reported, linearly weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture current activity and social participation limitations in participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The I-RODS comprises 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The participant assigns a score between 0 and 2 to each item as follows: 0 (impossible to perform), 1 (performed with difficulty), 2 (easily performed) with a lower score indicating more severe activity and social participation limitations. A total I-RODS score of 0 (complete disability) to 48 (no disability) is tabulated by totalling the 24-item responses where higher score represents better outcomes.
Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS)
Tidsramme: Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

The MRC-SS is used clinician-reported measure of muscle strength. Assessments are conducted bilaterally on six muscle groups: upper arm abductors, elbow flexors, wrist extensors, hip flexors, knee extensors, and foot dorsal flexors. Each muscle is rated from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no visible contraction and 5 indicates normal strength. The scores are summed to obtain the MRC-SS, which ranges from 0 (quadriplegic) to 60 (normal strength).
Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Screening in MRC-SS
Tidsramme: Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

The MRC-SS is used clinician-reported measure of muscle strength. Assessments are conducted bilaterally on six muscle groups: upper arm abductors, elbow flexors, wrist extensors, hip flexors, knee extensors, and foot dorsal flexors. Each muscle is rated from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no visible contraction and 5 indicates normal strength. The scores are summed to obtain the MRC-SS, which ranges from 0 (quadriplegic) to 60 (normal strength).
Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in Bilateral Hand Grip Strength
Tidsramme: Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

Bilateral hand grip strength assessments will be performed by prescribing physicians or qualified designees using the Martin Vigorimeter, measuring strength in kilopascals (kPa) ranging from 0 to 160 kPa.
Baseline (last assessment prior first dose on Day 1), at 12, 24 and 54 weeks
Change From Screening in Bilateral Grip Strength
Tidsramme: Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

Bilateral hand grip strength assessments will be performed by prescribing physicians or qualified designees using the Martin Vigorimeter, measuring strength in kPa ranging from 0 to 160 kPa.
Screening, at 12, 24 and 54 weeks

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Takeda

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Studieleder: Study Director, Takeda

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Hjælpsomme links

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
14. maj 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
2. december 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
8. juni 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
23. januar 2025

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
23. januar 2025

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
29. januar 2025

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
3. november 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
30. oktober 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. oktober 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • TAK-411-2001

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/ For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ja

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger