Animated Video Versus Written Leaflet for Preoperative Kidney Transplant Education
Comparing the Effects of Animated Video and Written Information on Understanding, Knowledge Level, and Anxiety in Explaining Kidney Transplant Surgery to Patients
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Ankara, Tyrkiet (Türkiye), 06800
- Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 75 years
- Kidney transplant candidate or prospective living donor undergoing preoperative evaluation
- Able to read and write Turkish
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous exposure to the study's animated educational video
- Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate adequately for assessment
- Visual or hearing impairment preventing completion of questionnaires or viewing of the material
- Documented severe psychiatric disorder
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Video group
Standard verbal counselling plus an animated educational video.
|
Approximately 2.5-minute animation depicting the kidney transplant surgical pathway
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Written group
Standard verbal counselling plus a content-matched written information leaflet.
|
Illustrated A4 leaflet with content identical to the video.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in procedural knowledge
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Procedural knowledge was measured with a 7-item investigator-developed multiple-choice Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire, scored as the number of incorrect responses.
Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (more incorrect answers); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
|
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
|
Change in preoperative anxiety with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Preoperative anxiety and information need were measured with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), total score.
Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
|
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-intervention knowledge score (between groups)
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Number of incorrect responses on the 7-item Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire after the intervention, compared between groups.
Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (a worse outcome).
|
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
|
Post-intervention Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score (between groups)
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Total Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score after the intervention, compared between groups.
Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need).
|
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
|
Participant satisfaction
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
Participant satisfaction was measured with a 5-item investigator-developed Satisfaction and Perceived Benefit Questionnaire, each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale, summed to a total score.
Scores range from a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 25.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction and perceived benefit).
|
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
|
|
Preferred information modality
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
|
Preferred information modality for future preoperative education, reported by participants after cross-over exposure to both formats immediately after the questionairre.
This is a categorical outcome (video only / written only / both / no preference), not a scored scale; therefore minimum and maximum values are not applicable.
|
Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
|
|
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) score
Tidsramme: Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)
|
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): the PEMAT for Audiovisual materials (PEMAT-A/V) for the animated video and the PEMAT for Printable materials (PEMAT-P) for the written leaflet.
The understandability score is expressed as a percentage, ranging from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 100%.
Higher percentages indicate a better outcome (greater understandability).
|
Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Efterforskere
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Muhammed E Polat, Dr., Ankara Bilkent City Hospital ; Department of Urology ; Ankara ; Türkiye
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- TABED 2-25-1755
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .