Educational Intervention to Increase Physician Satisfaction and Effectiveness With a New Electronic Health Record
Interventions to Increase Physician Effectiveness and Acceptance of a Electronic Health Record System
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
West Reading, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 19612
- Reading Health System
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Internal Medicine physicians and resident physicians with inpatient clinical duties at the time of the EPIC electronic health record go-live (Feb 4, 2013)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Physicians whose duties did not include regular admissions and discharge of patients
- Physicians whose work was limited to teaching
- Physicians with prior experience in using EPIC systems for inpatient care .
- Physician assistants and nurse practitioners
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: One-on-one physician training
One-on-one physician training Physicians in the experimental arm were visited by a instructing physician at a computer while performing clinical duties who had observed others to identify best practices.
Instructors watched subjects' work, looking for a specific tip that could be applied to the current work, then demonstrated the tip, and answered any questions the subject had about using or applying this new technique .
|
Physicians in the experimental arm were visited by a instructing physician at a computer while performing clinical duties who had observed others to identify best practices.
Instructors watched subjects' work, looking for a specific tip that could be applied to the current work, then demonstrated the tip, and answered any questions the subject had about using or applying this new technique .
Usual training included online e-modules, 12 hours of classroom time, practice in the EPIC Playground, user acceptability training classes,non-physician technical support on all of the floors, and a physician-only help line.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Usual training
Usual training.
This group will get the usual specified training for learning to use our electronic health record.
Both groups received 12 hours of EPIC classroom training, exposure to the EPIC e-learning modules, user acceptability testing classes, and unlimited time on the EPIC 'playground', a site to practice on virtual patients.
All had 90 days of elbow support with an EPIC-training non-physician technician, who were visible and available on all inpatient wards, as well as access to a physician-only support line available at all hours.
|
Usual training included online e-modules, 12 hours of classroom time, practice in the EPIC Playground, user acceptability training classes,non-physician technical support on all of the floors, and a physician-only help line.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to complete a progress note
Zeitfenster: within 1 week of note completion
|
the primary outcome measure will be time to complete a progress note.
this is defined as the difference between the recorded time of opening the note and the recorded time the note was signed in the EPIC electronic health record system.
|
within 1 week of note completion
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of notes completed after shift
Zeitfenster: within 1 week of posting note
|
Shifts are 7 a.m. - 7 p.m for doctors assigned to daytime work.
We defined a note completed after shift as any note with a signed time that is after 7 p.m. on the day of a shift worked.
|
within 1 week of posting note
|
|
Physician Satisfaction with EPIC Electronic Health Record
Zeitfenster: at baseline, 15-20 shifts, and 35-40 shifts
|
We asked the participants this question: How comfortable are you specifically using the EPIC program for inpatient practice?" at baseline, midpoint (after working 15-20 shifts), and end of the study (after working 35-40 shifts). |
at baseline, 15-20 shifts, and 35-40 shifts
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Leena Jalota, MBBS, Reading Health System
- Studienleiter: Anthony A Donato, MD MHPE, Reading Health System
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- ReadingHMC-IRB-045-12
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .