CANLINK: Evaluation of the Intralink Intradiscal Device for Low Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease
CANLINK: A Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of the Intralink Intradiscal Device for Treatment of Low Back Pain From Degenerative Disc Disease
A single site, prospective study to evaluate the safety and performance of the Intralink device in participants with chronic or recurrent non-radicular discogenic low back pain (LBP) due to degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Studienübersicht
Status
Status
Bedingungen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
This study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Intralink device in participants with chronic or recurrent non-radicular discogenic LBP due to DDD.
Studientyp
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Einschreibung
Phase
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
Studienkontakt
- Name: Echo Cundiff, Director of Clinical Research
- Telefonnummer: 815-848-4189
- E-Mail: ecundiff@spinalsimplicity.com
Studienorte
-
-
-
Calgary, Kanada
- Beam Radiology
-
Kontakt:
- Kimberly Clinical Research Manager
- Telefonnummer: 587-885-2988
- E-Mail: kcarcary@beamradiology.com
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 22 - 80 years
- Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
- Six (6) months or more of chronic low back pain and failure to respond to conservative care
- Pain medication use has been stable for at least 30 days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Symptomatic DDD at more than 2 levels
- Previously diagnosed Paget's disease, osteomalacia, other metabolic bone disease
- Target disc collapse (disc height loss)
- Active systemic or spine infection
- Recent (< 3 months) therapeutic interventions (i.e., IDET, PRP or stem cell injections) on the target disc(s)
- Any surgery at the index level (i.e. discectomy or intradiscal ablation) or any extensive surgery (fusion, artificial disc, laminectomy) at any lumbar level
- Previous treatment of target disc level with steroid injection, intradiscal injection, trigger point injection, facet or medial branch block within 90 days of enrollment
- Active malignancy
- Spinal tumor
- Presence of extruded disc herniation or wide annular fissures confluent with large disc protrusions at the symptomatic level.
- Symptomatic spinal stenosis (i.e., neurogenic claudication)
- Congenital or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1
- Currently participating in another investigational study that could interfere with the outcome measures of this study
- Known anaphylactic reaction to contrast dye
- Opioid medication >60 MME/day within 60 days of enrollment
- If female, participants who are pregnant or are trying to become pregnant during the course of the trial (due to risks of additional radiation exposures); participants of child-bearing potential that are sexually active must use a reliable form of birth control and present a negative urine pregnancy test prior to the implant procedure
- Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion may apply
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Anzahl der Arme
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / ArmTeilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlungIntervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment
Intralink Device |
Device: Intralink
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Zeitfenster: 1 Month compared to Baseline
|
Change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ODI is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to track changes in a patient's condition over time and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for low back pain. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each addressing a specific aspect of daily functioning. A higher score indicates greater disability. The final score/index ranges from 0-100 scale. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed bound. |
1 Month compared to Baseline
|
|
Assess occurrence of serious adverse events post-treatment.
Zeitfenster: Through 1 Month post procedure
|
Frequency of serious adverse events post implant |
Through 1 Month post procedure
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate type of adverse events
Zeitfenster: Baseline through 6 months post procedure
|
Incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) |
Baseline through 6 months post procedure
|
|
Assess change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) post-procedure
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post procedure
|
Change from baseline in mean disability scores using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ODI is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to track changes in a patient's condition over time and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for low back pain. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each addressing a specific aspect of daily functioning. A higher score indicates greater disability. The final score/index ranges from 0-100 scale. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed bound. |
3, 6, 12, and 24 months post procedure
|
|
Assess change from baseline in mean pain scores using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Zeitfenster: 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months post procedure
|
Change from baseline in mean pain scores using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The VAS is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-100 mm scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 100 meaning "the worst pain imaginable". |
1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months post procedure
|
|
Evaluate change of baseline spinal instability using flexion-extension radiographic imaging
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months
|
Proportion of participants with a 50% or greater reduction from baseline value in spinal instability (when baseline value is greater than or equal to 1.0), as measured by vertebral angular motion and sagittal plane translations on flexion-extension radiographs |
Baseline, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Assess use of escalated interventions post-procedure
Zeitfenster: From Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Any of the following count as escalated interventions: increase pain medication use and additional interventions - i.e. injections and surgical interventions at the treatment level. |
From Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Zeitfenster: 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) PGIC is a standardized tool designed to assess a patient's self-reported perception of improvement or worsening in their health status over time. The PGIC consists of 1 question, using a 1 to 7 scale: 1-Very Much Improved to 7-Very much Worse. |
1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Zeitfenster: 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
|
Patient Satisfaction Survey is designed to assess a patient's self-reported satisfaction or dissatisfaction on a 5 point scale. 1- Very Satisfied to 5-Very Dissatisfied |
1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-implant
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Hedman T, Yu J, Singh H, Deer T. Early Clinical Results of Intervertebral Joint Stabilization by Injectable Load-Sharing Polymers. J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 10;16:2777-2789. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S413104. eCollection 2023.
- Hedman T, Rogers A. Pathomechanics of Early-Stage Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degradation Leading to Discogenic Pain-A Narrative Review. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;12(4):389. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040389.
- Hedman T, Rogers A, Beall D. A Self-Polymerizing Mesh of Nano-Tethers for the Mechanical Constraint of Degraded Intervertebral Discs-A Review of 25 Years of Pre-Clinical and Early Clinical Research. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 24;11(6):535. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060535.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Zuerst gepostet
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes Update gepostet
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- CANLINK-2026-CIP
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .