Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

TExT-MED + FANS Full Trial (TExTMED+FANSII)

14. Juli 2021 aktualisiert von: Elizabeth Burner, University of Southern California

Trial to EXamine Text Messaging for Diabetes in ED Patients Incorporating Social Support - Intervention With Washout

This is an intervention to study incorporating social support into mHealth interventions for low-income, ED patients with diabetes

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Diabetes has disproportionately affected the Latino population. TExT-MED (Trial to Examine Text Message for Emergency Department Patients with Diabetes) is a locally designed, successful mobile health (mHealth) intervention for low income Latinos with diabetes. Social support interventions have likewise been successful at improving patient self-efficacy and disease management but are limited in scale due to two key obstacles: 1) requirements of in-person training of family and friends to be supporters and 2) the need to coordinate schedules and physical location between the patient and their supporter. mHealth can overcome these obstacles by allowing supporters to be trained remotely via a mobile platform and by allowing communication between a patient and supporter to occur at any time or place. The proposed intervention leverages the success of TExT-MED by augmenting the program with a social supporter that each patient can select from his or her own social support system (Family And friend Network Supporters (FANS)), creating TExT-MED+FANS. This is a 12 month, randomized study of this intervention. At the completion of the trial, we will evaluate the user experience with TExT-MED+FANS, and the impact of TExT-MED+FANS on patient motivation, self-efficacy and behaviors through a qualitative analysis of semi-structured individual interviews.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

166

Phase

  • Phase 2

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90033
        • LAC+USC Medicine Center Emergency Department

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18
  • HbA1c>8.5
  • Social support person identified and contacted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to consent
  • does not speak/read English or Spanish

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: TExT-MED only
Patients receive SMS-textmessage curriculum to improve self0-efficacy and self care for diabetes. A patient-identified family member receives a social support curriculum (FANS) in traditional booklet form.
Verhalten: TExT-MED
messages designed to inspire motivation and behavior change
Experimental: TExT-MED+FANS
Patients receive SMS-textmessage curriculum to improve self0-efficacy and self care for diabetes. A patient-identified family member receives a social support curriculum (FANS) by SMS-text-message synchronized by time and content.
Verhalten: TExT-MED
messages designed to inspire motivation and behavior change
Verhalten: FANS
SMS delivered messages to family members to improve social support

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in HBA1c From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Glycemic control is measured by hemoglobin A1C collected at point-of-care from an Afinion AS100 capillary point of care machine. The Afinion machine has excellent point of care correlation with laboratory values. As a surrogate for average glycemic control over the previous 3 months and with correlation with clinical outcomes, hemoglobin A1c is a marker of overall clinical disease management. Change is baseline value minus follow up value.
6 Months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in HBA1c From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 months
Glycemic control is measured by hemoglobin A1C collected at point-of-care from an Afinion AS100 capillary point of care machine. The Afinion machine has excellent point of care correlation with laboratory values. As a surrogate for average glycemic control over the previous 3 months and with correlation with clinical outcomes, hemoglobin A1c is a marker of overall clinical disease management. Change is 6 month value minus 12 month value.
12 months
Change in BMI From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Calculated from Weight and Height. As a measure of adiposity, it correlates positively with cardiovascular disease outcomes. While imperfect, it is an easily measured and validated marker.
6 Months
Change in BMI From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Calculated from Weight and Height. As a measure of adiposity, it correlates positively with cardiovascular disease outcomes. While imperfect, it is an easily measured and validated marker.
12 Months
Change in Abdominal Circumference From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
A measure of central adiposity, it correlates with cardiovascular outcomes.
6 Months
Change From Abdominal Circumference From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
A measure of central adiposity, it correlates with cardiovascular outcomes.
12 Months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the systolic blood pressure for that visit. Systolic blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular complications
6 Months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the systolic blood pressure for that visit. Systolic blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular complications
12 Months
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the diastolic blood pressure for that visit.
6 Months
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the diastolic blood pressure for that visit.
12 Months
Change in Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (Toobert, Hampson, Glasgow, & RE, 2000). The Summary consists of 6 subscales representing different domains of diabetes related healthy behaviors and self-care. It has been validated in over 10 studies, with the results published in two manuscripts: one with three studies (Toobert & Glasgow, 1994), and one with seven studies(Toobert et al., 2000). Each measure ranges from Each range from 0-7, indicating number of days per week patient reports engaging in these behaviors.
6 Months
Change in Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (Toobert, Hampson, Glasgow, & RE, 2000). The Summary consists of 6 subscales representing different domains of diabetes related healthy behaviors and self-care. It has been validated in over 10 studies, with the results published in two manuscripts: one with three studies (Toobert & Glasgow, 1994), and one with seven studies(Toobert et al., 2000). Each measure ranges from Each range from 0-7, indicating number of days per week patient reports engaging in these behaviors.
12 Months
Change in Wilson 3 Item Scale From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Medication adherence(Wilson et al.,2014). The 3item medication adherence scale is a self-report measure that assessing no. of days medication missed in prior month, days taken medication as advised & self-rated medication adherence. Developed in HIV research, it has been validated for non-HIV medications (Wilson, et al,2016). Each component contributes 33% of the scale. Total score ranges from 0-100. It is the combination of 3 sub-scores, (days missed dose(negative scored), self-rating, days taking medications as indicated). Higher scores indicate better medication adherence.
6 Months
Change in Wilson 3 Item Scale From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Medication adherence(Wilson et al.,2014). The 3item medication adherence scale is a self-report measure that assessing no. of days medication missed in prior month, days taken medication as advised & self-rated medication adherence. Developed in HIV research, it has been validated for non-HIV medications (Wilson, et al,2016). Each component contributes 33% of the scale. Total score ranges from 0-100. It is the combination of 3 sub-scores, (days missed dose(negative scored), self-rating, days taking medications as indicated). Higher scores indicate better medication adherence.
12 Months
Change in Healthcare Utilization From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Healthcare utilization by EMR review of clinic appointments, ED visits and hospitalizations within enrollment through 6 months at each follow up visit.
6 Months
Change in Healthcare Utilization From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Healthcare utilization by EMR review of clinic appointments, ED visits and hospitalizations within enrollment through 6 months at each follow up visit.
12 Months
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Change in Self-efficacy. Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (Anderson, Fitzgerald, Gruppen, Funnell, & Oh, 2003), is a measure of a patient's overall diabetes related self-efficacy, shortened by the original from 37 to an 8 item scale. It has reliability of alpha=0.84; and has been shown to be sensitive to change in multiple populations and is correlated with improved glycemic control measured by A1C (Anderson et al., 2003). It ranges from 8-40 points; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
6 Months
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 months
Change in Self-efficacy. Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (Anderson, Fitzgerald, Gruppen, Funnell, & Oh, 2003), is a measure of a patient's overall diabetes related self-efficacy, shortened by the original from 37 to an 8 item scale. It has reliability of alpha=0.84; and has been shown to be sensitive to change in multiple populations and is correlated with improved glycemic control measured by A1C (Anderson et al., 2003). It ranges from 8-40 points; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
12 months
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Diabetes related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale) (Polonsky et al., 2005), is a 17 item scale measuring distress related to emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal issues. It has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88-0.93 in various studies. Higher scores are negatively correlated with several healthy behaviors. Each question is a Likert scale ranking of how serious a particular issue is from 1-6, 6 indicating a more significant problem. The scores are then averaged across all item, with final scores ranging from 1-6, with 6 indicating higher levels of distress
6 Months
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Diabetes related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale) (Polonsky et al., 2005), is a 17 item scale measuring distress related to emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal issues. It has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88-0.93 in various studies. Higher scores are negatively correlated with several healthy behaviors. Each question is a Likert scale ranking of how serious a particular issue is from 1-6, 6 indicating a more significant problem. The scores are then averaged across all item, with final scores ranging from 1-6, with 6 indicating higher levels of distress
12 Months
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Depression as measured by the PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Lowe, 2010), is a widely used scale of depression used in clinical practice and research. The Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.86-0.89, and it has been validated in multiple languages. Depression is worse with higher scores. Score ranges from 0 to 27. Higher levels of depression are associated with fewer healthy behaviors and worse glycemic control.
6 Months
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Depression as measured by the PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Lowe, 2010), is a widely used scale of depression used in clinical practice and research. The Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.86-0.89, and it has been validated in multiple languages. Depression is worse with higher scores. Score ranges from 0 to 27. Higher levels of depression are associated with fewer healthy behaviors and worse glycemic control.
12 Months
Change in Fatalism From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Fatalism is measured by the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (Egede & Ellis, 2010), which measures three subscale emotional distress, religiosity and coping and perceived self-efficacy, which are summed together. The total score ranges from 12-72, higher score indicates higher fatalism, and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80. The score is associated with glycemic control, depression, self-care behaviors and social factors.
6 Months
Change in Fatalism From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Fatalism is measured by the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (Egede & Ellis, 2010), which measures three subscale emotional distress, religiosity and coping and perceived self-efficacy, which are summed together. The total score ranges from 12-72, higher score indicates higher fatalism, and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80. The score is associated with glycemic control, depression, self-care behaviors and social factors.
12 Months
Change in WHO Quality of Life From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Quality of life (World Health Organization WHO-5 Well Being Index) (Topp, Ostergaard, Sondergaard, & Bech, 2015) is a widely used measure of quality life, validated in many languages and consists of only 5 items. Each self-reported item is scored between 0 and 5, summed together and then multiplied by 4. The total range is from 0 to 100, with 0 being the lowest quality of life.
6 Months
Change in WHO Quality of Life From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Quality of life (World Health Organization WHO-5 Well Being Index) (Topp, Ostergaard, Sondergaard, & Bech, 2015) is a widely used measure of quality life, validated in many languages and consists of only 5 items. Each self-reported item is scored between 0 and 5, summed together and then multiplied by 4. The total range is from 0 to 100, with 0 being the lowest quality of life.
12 Months
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist - Supportive From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005). Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior). Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
6 Months
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist Supportive From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005). Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior). Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
12 Months
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist - Nonsupportive From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005). Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior). Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
6 Months
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist Nonsupportive From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005). Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior). Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
12 Months
Change in Diabetes Care Profile Support From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Diabetes-specific social support is measured by the Diabetes Care Profile Support Questions,(Fitzgerald et al., 1996) with sub-scores for perceived disease specific support needs and perceived disease specific support received. Diabetes Care Profile support questions: Support wanted, and support received. Each range from 5 to 30, high scores indicating high desire for support and higher support received.
6 Months
Change in Diabetes Care Profile Support From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Diabetes-specific social support is measured by the Diabetes Care Profile Support Questions,(Fitzgerald et al., 1996) with sub-scores for perceived disease specific support needs and perceived disease specific support received. Diabetes Care Profile support questions: Support wanted, and support received. Each range from 5 to 30, high scores indicating high desire for support and higher support received.
12 Months
Change in Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Measure Description: General social support is captured by the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Emotional and&Tangible subscales.(Norbeck, Lindsey, & Carrieri, 1981) General social support: Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, emotional sub score (ranges 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher perceived emotional support) & tangible sub score (0-8, higher score indicating higher perceived tangible support). While the subscores are highly correlated, the authors do not recommend Cronbach's alpha as a test of internal validity.(http://eileengigliotti.com/uploads/1/1/0/2/110241155/nssq-psychometric.pdf)
6 Months
Change in Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire From 6 Months to 12 Months
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Measure Description: General social support is captured by the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Emotional and&Tangible subscales.(Norbeck, Lindsey, & Carrieri, 1981) General social support: Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, emotional sub score (ranges 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher perceived emotional support) & tangible sub score (0-8, higher score indicating higher perceived tangible support). While the subscores are highly correlated, the authors do not recommend Cronbach's alpha as a test of internal validity.(http://eileengigliotti.com/uploads/1/1/0/2/110241155/nssq-psychometric.pdf)
12 Months
Change in Partner Distress Scale From Baseline
Zeitfenster: 6 Months
Supporter diabetes-related distress is measured by the Partner Distress Scale (Polonsky, Fisher, Hessler, &Johnson, 2016). The self-report scale consists of 21 items in 4 domains: "my partner's diabetes management", "how best to help", "diabetes & me", & "hypoglycemia". Domains are summed together. Each item is score from 0 to 4, lower scores indicate less distress. The total score is an average of the 21 items. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.76 for total scores. Greater partner distress is correlated with higher A1C among patients, worse self-care & lower satisfaction with relationship
6 Months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

University of Southern California

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

18. Juli 2017

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

2. Dezember 2019

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

2. Dezember 2019

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

5. Juni 2017

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

5. Juni 2017

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

7. Juni 2017

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. August 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

14. Juli 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • HS-17-00406

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur TExT-MED

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Malawi

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren