- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT03178773
TExT-MED + FANS Full Trial (TExTMED+FANSII)
14 de julho de 2021 atualizado por: Elizabeth Burner, University of Southern California
Trial to EXamine Text Messaging for Diabetes in ED Patients Incorporating Social Support - Intervention With Washout
This is an intervention to study incorporating social support into mHealth interventions for low-income, ED patients with diabetes
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Diabetes has disproportionately affected the Latino population.
TExT-MED (Trial to Examine Text Message for Emergency Department Patients with Diabetes) is a locally designed, successful mobile health (mHealth) intervention for low income Latinos with diabetes.
Social support interventions have likewise been successful at improving patient self-efficacy and disease management but are limited in scale due to two key obstacles: 1) requirements of in-person training of family and friends to be supporters and 2) the need to coordinate schedules and physical location between the patient and their supporter.
mHealth can overcome these obstacles by allowing supporters to be trained remotely via a mobile platform and by allowing communication between a patient and supporter to occur at any time or place.
The proposed intervention leverages the success of TExT-MED by augmenting the program with a social supporter that each patient can select from his or her own social support system (Family And friend Network Supporters (FANS)), creating TExT-MED+FANS.
This is a 12 month, randomized study of this intervention.
At the completion of the trial, we will evaluate the user experience with TExT-MED+FANS, and the impact of TExT-MED+FANS on patient motivation, self-efficacy and behaviors through a qualitative analysis of semi-structured individual interviews.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
166
Estágio
- Fase 2
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90033
- LAC+USC Medicine Center Emergency Department
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >18
- HbA1c>8.5
- Social support person identified and contacted
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to consent
- does not speak/read English or Spanish
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: TExT-MED only
Patients receive SMS-textmessage curriculum to improve self0-efficacy and self care for diabetes.
A patient-identified family member receives a social support curriculum (FANS) in traditional booklet form.
|
messages designed to inspire motivation and behavior change
|
|
Experimental: TExT-MED+FANS
Patients receive SMS-textmessage curriculum to improve self0-efficacy and self care for diabetes.
A patient-identified family member receives a social support curriculum (FANS) by SMS-text-message synchronized by time and content.
|
messages designed to inspire motivation and behavior change
SMS delivered messages to family members to improve social support
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HBA1c From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Glycemic control is measured by hemoglobin A1C collected at point-of-care from an Afinion AS100 capillary point of care machine.
The Afinion machine has excellent point of care correlation with laboratory values.
As a surrogate for average glycemic control over the previous 3 months and with correlation with clinical outcomes, hemoglobin A1c is a marker of overall clinical disease management.
Change is baseline value minus follow up value.
|
6 Months
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HBA1c From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 months
|
Glycemic control is measured by hemoglobin A1C collected at point-of-care from an Afinion AS100 capillary point of care machine.
The Afinion machine has excellent point of care correlation with laboratory values.
As a surrogate for average glycemic control over the previous 3 months and with correlation with clinical outcomes, hemoglobin A1c is a marker of overall clinical disease management.
Change is 6 month value minus 12 month value.
|
12 months
|
|
Change in BMI From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Calculated from Weight and Height.
As a measure of adiposity, it correlates positively with cardiovascular disease outcomes.
While imperfect, it is an easily measured and validated marker.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in BMI From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Calculated from Weight and Height.
As a measure of adiposity, it correlates positively with cardiovascular disease outcomes.
While imperfect, it is an easily measured and validated marker.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Abdominal Circumference From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
A measure of central adiposity, it correlates with cardiovascular outcomes.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change From Abdominal Circumference From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
A measure of central adiposity, it correlates with cardiovascular outcomes.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the systolic blood pressure for that visit.
Systolic blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular complications
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the systolic blood pressure for that visit.
Systolic blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular complications
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the diastolic blood pressure for that visit.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Blood pressure is measured by study RAs after the patient is seated for 5 minutes, with the average of three readings used as the diastolic blood pressure for that visit.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (Toobert, Hampson, Glasgow, & RE, 2000).
The Summary consists of 6 subscales representing different domains of diabetes related healthy behaviors and self-care.
It has been validated in over 10 studies, with the results published in two manuscripts: one with three studies (Toobert & Glasgow, 1994), and one with seven studies(Toobert et al., 2000).
Each measure ranges from Each range from 0-7, indicating number of days per week patient reports engaging in these behaviors.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (Toobert, Hampson, Glasgow, & RE, 2000).
The Summary consists of 6 subscales representing different domains of diabetes related healthy behaviors and self-care.
It has been validated in over 10 studies, with the results published in two manuscripts: one with three studies (Toobert & Glasgow, 1994), and one with seven studies(Toobert et al., 2000).
Each measure ranges from Each range from 0-7, indicating number of days per week patient reports engaging in these behaviors.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Wilson 3 Item Scale From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Medication adherence(Wilson et al.,2014).
The 3item medication adherence scale is a self-report measure that assessing no. of days medication missed in prior month, days taken medication as advised & self-rated medication adherence.
Developed in HIV research, it has been validated for non-HIV medications (Wilson, et al,2016).
Each component contributes 33% of the scale.
Total score ranges from 0-100.
It is the combination of 3 sub-scores, (days missed dose(negative scored), self-rating, days taking medications as indicated).
Higher scores indicate better medication adherence.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Wilson 3 Item Scale From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Medication adherence(Wilson et al.,2014).
The 3item medication adherence scale is a self-report measure that assessing no. of days medication missed in prior month, days taken medication as advised & self-rated medication adherence.
Developed in HIV research, it has been validated for non-HIV medications (Wilson, et al,2016).
Each component contributes 33% of the scale.
Total score ranges from 0-100.
It is the combination of 3 sub-scores, (days missed dose(negative scored), self-rating, days taking medications as indicated).
Higher scores indicate better medication adherence.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Healthcare Utilization From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Healthcare utilization by EMR review of clinic appointments, ED visits and hospitalizations within enrollment through 6 months at each follow up visit.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Healthcare Utilization From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Healthcare utilization by EMR review of clinic appointments, ED visits and hospitalizations within enrollment through 6 months at each follow up visit.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Change in Self-efficacy.
Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (Anderson, Fitzgerald, Gruppen, Funnell, & Oh, 2003), is a measure of a patient's overall diabetes related self-efficacy, shortened by the original from 37 to an 8 item scale.
It has reliability of alpha=0.84; and has been shown to be sensitive to change in multiple populations and is correlated with improved glycemic control measured by A1C (Anderson et al., 2003).
It ranges from 8-40 points; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 months
|
Change in Self-efficacy.
Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (Anderson, Fitzgerald, Gruppen, Funnell, & Oh, 2003), is a measure of a patient's overall diabetes related self-efficacy, shortened by the original from 37 to an 8 item scale.
It has reliability of alpha=0.84; and has been shown to be sensitive to change in multiple populations and is correlated with improved glycemic control measured by A1C (Anderson et al., 2003).
It ranges from 8-40 points; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
|
12 months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Diabetes related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale) (Polonsky et al., 2005), is a 17 item scale measuring distress related to emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal issues.
It has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88-0.93 in various studies.
Higher scores are negatively correlated with several healthy behaviors.
Each question is a Likert scale ranking of how serious a particular issue is from 1-6, 6 indicating a more significant problem.
The scores are then averaged across all item, with final scores ranging from 1-6, with 6 indicating higher levels of distress
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Diabetes related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale) (Polonsky et al., 2005), is a 17 item scale measuring distress related to emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal issues.
It has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88-0.93 in various studies.
Higher scores are negatively correlated with several healthy behaviors.
Each question is a Likert scale ranking of how serious a particular issue is from 1-6, 6 indicating a more significant problem.
The scores are then averaged across all item, with final scores ranging from 1-6, with 6 indicating higher levels of distress
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Depression as measured by the PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Lowe, 2010), is a widely used scale of depression used in clinical practice and research.
The Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.86-0.89,
and it has been validated in multiple languages.
Depression is worse with higher scores.
Score ranges from 0 to 27.
Higher levels of depression are associated with fewer healthy behaviors and worse glycemic control.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Depression as measured by the PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Lowe, 2010), is a widely used scale of depression used in clinical practice and research.
The Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.86-0.89,
and it has been validated in multiple languages.
Depression is worse with higher scores.
Score ranges from 0 to 27.
Higher levels of depression are associated with fewer healthy behaviors and worse glycemic control.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Fatalism From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Fatalism is measured by the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (Egede & Ellis, 2010), which measures three subscale emotional distress, religiosity and coping and perceived self-efficacy, which are summed together.
The total score ranges from 12-72, higher score indicates higher fatalism, and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80.
The score is associated with glycemic control, depression, self-care behaviors and social factors.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Fatalism From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Fatalism is measured by the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (Egede & Ellis, 2010), which measures three subscale emotional distress, religiosity and coping and perceived self-efficacy, which are summed together.
The total score ranges from 12-72, higher score indicates higher fatalism, and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80.
The score is associated with glycemic control, depression, self-care behaviors and social factors.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in WHO Quality of Life From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Quality of life (World Health Organization WHO-5 Well Being Index) (Topp, Ostergaard, Sondergaard, & Bech, 2015) is a widely used measure of quality life, validated in many languages and consists of only 5 items.
Each self-reported item is scored between 0 and 5, summed together and then multiplied by 4. The total range is from 0 to 100, with 0 being the lowest quality of life.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in WHO Quality of Life From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Quality of life (World Health Organization WHO-5 Well Being Index) (Topp, Ostergaard, Sondergaard, & Bech, 2015) is a widely used measure of quality life, validated in many languages and consists of only 5 items.
Each self-reported item is scored between 0 and 5, summed together and then multiplied by 4. The total range is from 0 to 100, with 0 being the lowest quality of life.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist - Supportive From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005).
Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior).
Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist Supportive From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005).
Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior).
Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist - Nonsupportive From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005).
Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior).
Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist Nonsupportive From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Diabetes-related supportive and obstructive family behaviors are measured by patient report on the Diabetes Family Behavior checklist (Lewin et al., 2005).
Family behaviors: supportive and non-supportive sub-scores of the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist: supportive ranges from 4-45 (4 being lowest in family supportive behavior), non-supportive ranges from 7-35 (4 indicating least report of non-supportive behavior).
Non-supportive scores are subtracted form supportive scores for a total.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Care Profile Support From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Diabetes-specific social support is measured by the Diabetes Care Profile Support Questions,(Fitzgerald et al., 1996) with sub-scores for perceived disease specific support needs and perceived disease specific support received.
Diabetes Care Profile support questions: Support wanted, and support received.
Each range from 5 to 30, high scores indicating high desire for support and higher support received.
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Diabetes Care Profile Support From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Diabetes-specific social support is measured by the Diabetes Care Profile Support Questions,(Fitzgerald et al., 1996) with sub-scores for perceived disease specific support needs and perceived disease specific support received.
Diabetes Care Profile support questions: Support wanted, and support received.
Each range from 5 to 30, high scores indicating high desire for support and higher support received.
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Measure Description: General social support is captured by the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Emotional and&Tangible subscales.(Norbeck,
Lindsey, & Carrieri, 1981) General social support: Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, emotional sub score (ranges 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher perceived emotional support) & tangible sub score (0-8, higher score indicating higher perceived tangible support).
While the subscores are highly correlated, the authors do not recommend Cronbach's alpha as a test of internal validity.(http://eileengigliotti.com/uploads/1/1/0/2/110241155/nssq-psychometric.pdf)
|
6 Months
|
|
Change in Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire From 6 Months to 12 Months
Prazo: 12 Months
|
Measure Description: General social support is captured by the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Emotional and&Tangible subscales.(Norbeck,
Lindsey, & Carrieri, 1981) General social support: Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, emotional sub score (ranges 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher perceived emotional support) & tangible sub score (0-8, higher score indicating higher perceived tangible support).
While the subscores are highly correlated, the authors do not recommend Cronbach's alpha as a test of internal validity.(http://eileengigliotti.com/uploads/1/1/0/2/110241155/nssq-psychometric.pdf)
|
12 Months
|
|
Change in Partner Distress Scale From Baseline
Prazo: 6 Months
|
Supporter diabetes-related distress is measured by the Partner Distress Scale (Polonsky, Fisher, Hessler, &Johnson, 2016).
The self-report scale consists of 21 items in 4 domains: "my partner's diabetes management", "how best to help", "diabetes & me", & "hypoglycemia".
Domains are summed together.
Each item is score from 0 to 4, lower scores indicate less distress.
The total score is an average of the 21 items.
The Cronbach's alpha was 0.76 for total scores.
Greater partner distress is correlated with higher A1C among patients, worse self-care & lower satisfaction with relationship
|
6 Months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
18 de julho de 2017
Conclusão Primária (Real)
2 de dezembro de 2019
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
2 de dezembro de 2019
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
5 de junho de 2017
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
5 de junho de 2017
Primeira postagem (Real)
7 de junho de 2017
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
6 de agosto de 2021
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
14 de julho de 2021
Última verificação
1 de julho de 2021
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HS-17-00406
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em TExT-MED
-
University of Southern CaliforniaConcluído
-
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes...ConcluídoDiabetes Mellitus, Tipo 2Espanha
-
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes...ConcluídoIntervenção de saúde móvel para prevenir diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (estudo de fase II) (preDIABETEXT)Estado pré-diabéticoEspanha
-
USDA Beltsville Human Nutrition Research CenterPenn State UniversityConcluídoVoluntários SaudáveisEstados Unidos
-
Taipei Medical UniversityConcluído
-
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes...ConcluídoDiabetes Mellitus, Tipo 2Espanha
-
USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research CenterEgg Nutrition CenterRescindido
-
Pulse TherapeuticsSuspensoDistúrbios Cerebrovasculares | Distúrbio Neurológico | Infarto da Artéria Cerebral Média | AVC Isquêmico | AVC, Agudo | Embolia Intracraniana e Trombose | AVC TrombóticoReino Unido
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Recrutamento
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityConcluídoComprometimento Cognitivo Leve (MCI) | Saúde Bucal | Dieta mediterrâneaTaiwan