- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07695064
Comparing the Effects of Manual Cross Friction Massage Versus Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, And Functional Disability in Patients With Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
KPK
-
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, 25000
- Ibadat International University, Islamabad
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Both male and female aged between 18 to 60 years with a clinical diagnosis of lateral elbow pain lasting for≥ 6 months duration VAS score ≥ 4 during resisted wrist extension or grip activity ≥1 of the following tests being positive . Mill's test pain on passive wrist flexion and elbow extension Cozen's test pain on resisted wrist extension, elbow extended, wrist in flexion and medial deviation .
Painful palpation at the origin of the ECRB or lateral epicondyle
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants will be excluded as:
History of recent fracture,dislocation,or surgery near the elbow joint in the last 3 month Neurological or systemic inflammatory conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) Current use of corticosteroid injections in the elbow region within the past 6 weeks Previous physiotherapy interventions for the same complaint in the last 3 months.
Skin disorders or open wounds near the treatment area.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Manual Cross Friction Massage (CFM)
Arm Description: Patient seated , elbow flexed ~90 degree , forearm pronated , extensor tendon exposed and released.
Thumb / index finger applies firm transverse pressure .
|
Patient seated , elbow flexed ~90 degree , forearm pronated , extensor tendon exposed and released.
Thumb / index finger applies firm transverse pressure .
Short , deep ,rhythmic strokes perpendicular to ECRB tendon fibers (5 to 10 min ).Total duration 35 - 40 mins.
3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Group B: Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM)
Seated,Elbow flexed ~ 90 degree , forearm pronated, extensor tendon exposed and relaxed.
Stainless steel IASTMCurve bar S shape , dual grip tool was used with moderate ,tolerable pressure .
|
Seated,Elbow flexed ~ 90 degree , forearm pronated, extensor tendon exposed and relaxed.
Stainless steel IASTMCurve bar S shape , dual grip tool was used with moderate ,tolerable pressure .
Longitudinal sweeping (1-2 min ) , Cross fiber stokes (1-2 min), Fanning over tender point ( 1- 2min).
Flushing stokes (1min).40
-45 mins total time .
3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale.
Zeitfenster: Assessments were performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity during rest.
The level of pain was recorded on a 10 cm line where 0 was classified as "no pain" and 10 was classified as "worst possible pain".
Subjects were asked to indicate their pain level by placing a mark along this horizontal line
|
Assessments were performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
|
Goniometer
Zeitfenster: Assessments was performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
ROM measured was used a standard universal goniometer, which is considered a valid, reliable, and widely accepted clinical tool for assessing joint angles in musculoskeletal conditions.
Measurements were taken for wrist flexion, wrist extension, and elbow movements, following standardized positioning and landmark alignment to ensure consistency and accuracy.
|
Assessments was performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
|
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Assessments was performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is an instrument that has been developed specifically for use with this disorder [16].
It takes the form of a 15-item questionnaire, with five items addressing pain and 10 concerned with functional deficit.
For each item, the respondent uses a 0- 10 numerical scale to rate the average pain or difficulty they have experienced over the previous week while carrying out various activities that are commonly painful in tennis elbow.
The marking system ensures that pain and function are weighted equally in the total score.
Higher scores represent greater se- verity and the maximum score is 100
|
Assessments was performed at baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 6).
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/01/206
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis
-
Assiut UniversityRekrutierungTransversus Abdominis Flugzeugblock | Postoperative Analgesie | Thorakale Epiduralanalgesie | Subkostal | Lateral | Große BauchkrebsoperationÄgypten
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkAbgeschlossenSeitliche Epicondylitis | Laterale Epicondylitis, nicht näher bezeichneter Ellenbogen | Laterale Epicondylitis, linker Ellenbogen | Laterale Epicondylitis, rechter Ellenbogen | Laterale Epicondylitis (Tennisellenbogen) Bilateral | Mediale Epicondylitis | Mediale Epicondylitis, rechter Ellenbogen und andere BedingungenVereinigte Staaten
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandAbgeschlossenKnöchelbruch - Lateral MalleolusSchweiz
-
PuressentielNoch keine Rekrutierung
-
Ostfold Hospital TrustRekrutierungKnöchelbrüche | Knöchelbruch - Lateral Malleolus | Deltoideusband; Verstauchung (Zerrung) (Knöchel)Norwegen
-
University of CadizNoch keine RekrutierungEllbogen-Tendinopathie | Epicondylitis | Epicondylitis, seitlich | Epicondylitis des Ellenbogens
-
Spital Limmattal SchlierenAbgeschlossenKnöchelbruch - Lateral Malleolus | Knöchelbruch, Trimalleolar | Knöchelbruch, BimalleolarSchweiz
-
Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation...RekrutierungLaterale Epicondylitis des EllenbogensFrankreich
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosAbgeschlossen
-
Oslo University HospitalAbgeschlossenPostoperative Komplikationen | Knöchelbruch - Lateral Malleolus