Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pilot Feasibility Study of Psychosocial Support to Improve Well-being of Adults in Humanitarian Crises in Nepal (PM+)

27 de octubre de 2018 actualizado por: Brandon Kohrt, George Washington University

Pilot Feasibility Study of Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

This is a pilot feasibility study of group problem management plus, a low-intensity psychological intervention, delivered in five sessions to adults affected by humanitarian crises. The current study will evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to determine procedures and content for a subsequent full trial using a cluster-randomized design of group problem management plus versus enhanced treatment as usual.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Counselling programmes used in many humanitarian settings are often non-specific with unknown efficacy and safety. Only a few interventions in humanitarian crises have been rigorously tested, and most studied interventions focused on posttraumatic stress disorder. Beyond posttraumatic stress disorder, individuals may have a range of problems including depression, anxiety, and not being able to do daily tasks necessary for survival and recovery. However, interventions are often limited since they tend to target only a single outcome, are usually of longer duration (8-16 sessions) or require professionals.

In low resourced settings interventions need to be short of duration, and be carried out by lay people in the communities to make them sustainable and feasible to implement on a broader scale. World Health Organization aims to develop a range of low-intensity scale-able psychological interventions that address these issues, as part of its mental health Gap Action Program. As a first step a simplified psychological intervention Problem Management Plus (PM+) has been developed. It has 4 core features that make the intervention suitable for low resourced setting exposed to adversities. First, it is brief intervention (5-sessions), delivered individually or in groups; second, it can be delivered by paraprofessionals (high school graduates with no mental health experience), using the principle of task shifting/ task sharing; third, it is designed as a trans-diagnostic intervention, addressing a range of client identified emotional (e.g. depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, general stress) and practical problems; fourth, it is designed for people in low-income country communities affected by any kind of adversity (e.g. violence, disasters), not just focusing on a single kind of adversity.

Recent PM+ trails in Pakistan and Kenya have indicated PM+ to be effective in diminishing depression and anxiety and improving people's functioning and self-selected, culturally relevant outcomes. In this project Group PM+ will be piloted in a district in Nepal, which was affected by the 2015 earthquakes in Nepal. The current pilot study will evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of Group PM+ in Nepal to informant a subsequent pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. This exploratory cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster randomized controlled trial) will be conducted to gather information about the feasibility, safety and delivery of the intervention in the Nepali community settings; and to identify issues around training, supervision and outcomes measures. This research strategy is informed by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council framework for the development of complex interventions, which recognizes iterations of: a) Intervention Development; b) Feasibility and Piloting; c) Evaluation; and d) Implementation. This framework recommends to first conduct feasibility and randomized pilot studies before conducting large scale trials. In this way possible problems of acceptability, compliance, delivery of the intervention, recruitment and retention can be detected before the large definitive scale trail is conducted.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

120

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Sindhuli
      • Kamalamai, Sindhuli, Nepal
        • Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO) Nepal

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. score >2 on General Health Questionnaire (dichotomous item scoring method)
  2. score >16 on World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of a severe mental disorder (e.g., psychosis)
  2. Alcohol use disorder (score >16 on the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Group problem management plus
Five sessions of group low intensity psychological intervention
Low intensity group psychological intervention including stress management, behavioral activation, problem solving, and strengthening social support
Comparador activo: Enhanced treatment as usual
Referral to primary health care workers trained in mental health Gap Action Programme.
Low intensity group psychological intervention including stress management, behavioral activation, problem solving, and strengthening social support
Referral to primary care workers trained in mental health Gap Action Program Implementation Guide
Otros nombres:
  • mental health Gap Action Program-Implementation Guide

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Depression - Patient Health Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
9-item measure of depression symptoms, culturally and clinically validated in Nepal
1 week post-intervention

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Daily functioning - World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
12-item assessment ability to engage in daily activities, previously used in numerous studies in Nepal
1 week post-intervention
General psychological distress - General Health Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
12-item measure of general psychological distress, previously validated for use in Nepal
1 week post-intervention
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder - Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
8-tem measure of post-traumatic stress symptoms validated for use in Nepal
1 week post-intervention
Personalized Measure of Distress - Psychological Outcome Profiles
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
3-item measure of personalized distress and problems, 4-items post-treatment
1 week post-intervention
Culture-specific general psychological distress - Nepali Psychosocial and Mental Health Problems
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
5-item measure of somatic symptoms of psychosocial and mental health problems validated in Nepal
1 week post-intervention
Reducing Tension Checklist for Problem Management Plus Skills
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week post-intervention
12-item measure of behavioral and psychosocial skills related to coping mechanisms
1 week post-intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Mark van Ommeren, PhD, World Health Organization

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

17 de diciembre de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

31 de mayo de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de julio de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de noviembre de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de noviembre de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

2 de diciembre de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de octubre de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de octubre de 2018

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • ERC.0002817

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

This will be shared for full trial.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Group problem management plus

Suscribir