Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Approaches to Auditory Rehabilitation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)

3 juin 2014 mis à jour par: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Evaluation of Approaches to Auditory Rehabilitation for Mild TBI

Many soldiers returning from their recent service in Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) were exposed to blasts during combat. About 60% of blast-injured soldiers are diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI), with approximately 18% having a mild TBI (mTBI). mTBI is associated with many symptoms, including memory problems, headaches, difficulty concentrating, increased anxiety, and, especially relevant here, reports of difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments and/or when people speak rapidly. While problems understanding rapid speech or speech in noise are associated with hearing loss, many of the OIF/OEF veterans with these complaints have clinically normal hearing. Although there is no physical damage to their ears, these veterans' hearing problems have a negative impact on their quality-of-life and functioning. Thus it is incumbent upon the VA to examine intervention approaches for veterans with normal/near-normal auditory sensitivity and significant complaints of difficulty hearing. Currently, there is no standard-of-care for these veterans other than providing information about hearing, hearing conservation, and the use of communication strategies. Two forms of rehabilitation likely to be more effective than such an informational-counseling approach are: (1) the use of personal miniaturized Frequency modulation (FM) systems, and (2) the provision of auditory training with Posit Science Brain Fitness Program (BFP). Personal FM systems increase the loudness of the speech signal relative to that of the unwanted noise, while the BFP training improves the ability to listen by taking advantage of the brain's ability to change (i.e., neural plasticity). In this study veterans will randomly be selected to receive one of four treatments: (1) FM use alone, (2) BFP training alone, (3) FM+BFP training combined, and (4) informational-counseling. The effectiveness of the interventions will be compared using self-report of hearing functioning on standard questionnaires. Results will contribute to the development of evidence-based intervention approaches for blast-exposed veterans with reported functional hearing difficulties and normal/near-normal auditory sensitivity.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The long-term goal of this study is to develop evidence-based auditory rehabilitation for veterans who have normal/near-normal peripheral auditory function and significant complaints of difficulty hearing. Many are veterans of the OIF/OEF conflicts who have been exposed to blast - the most common wounding etiology in these conflicts. Approximately 18% of blast-injured veterans are diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). mTBI can result in post-concussive symptoms such as memory problems, difficulty concentrating, increased anxiety, and functional hearing difficulties in the presence of clinically-normal hearing sensitivity.

Currently there is no standard-of-care auditory rehabilitation for veterans with normal/near-normal auditory sensitivity and complaints of difficulty hearing. At a minimum, the VA recommends provision of information about the auditory system, hearing conservation and use of communication strategies. Two interventions likely to be more efficacious are: (1) use of personal FM (frequency modulation) systems, and/or (2) auditory training. FM systems are effective for managing auditory problems in children with normal/near normal peripheral hearing. FM systems substantially improve the signal-to-noise ratio of speech in noisy and reverberant environments, theoretically making more resources available for higher level processing. Auditory training takes advantage of neural plasticity. The Posit Science Brain Fitness Program (BFP) is an auditory training program for adults that can improve temporal processing and working memory of older adults. Combining use of FM systems with auditory training has been shown to improve speech understanding and to decrease reported hearing abilities among adults with sensorineural hearing loss and functional hearing complaints.

No study has systemically examined the relative efficacy of FM use and/or auditory training for veterans with mTBI and normal/almost normal hearing sensitivity. The effectiveness of these two intervention strategies will be examined in this study through a between-subjects randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the outcomes of: (1) FM use alone, (2) BFP alone, and (3) FM+BFP combined. All groups will also receive informational-counseling, as will (4) a control group. Outcomes will be measured subjectively through self-report of auditory competence.

The results of the study will help to determine whether or not the use of FM systems or auditory training, either alone or combined, are efficacious interventions for blast-exposed veterans with reported functional hearing difficulties and normal/near-normal auditory sensitivity. Results will contribute to the development of evidence-based auditory rehabilitation for these veterans, moving VA closer to fulfilling its goal of providing excellence in patient care, veterans' benefits and customer satisfaction.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

99

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, États-Unis, 33612
        • James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, États-Unis, 97201
        • VA Medical Center, Portland

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants will be OIF/OEF veterans with no exclusions based on age, ethnicity, or gender. To be included in the study participants will:

  • Report difficulty understanding speech in difficult listening environments disproportionate to loss in hearing sensitivity, as defined by self-referral to the study
  • Have hearing thresholds <= 65 decibels hearing loss (dB HL) at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 & 4.0 kilohertz (kHz)
  • Cognitive abilities sufficient to participate in the study, as determined by an age and education-level appropriate score on the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE; Folstein, Robins, & Helzer, 1983; Crum et al., 1993),
  • English as a first language,
  • Openness to using a personal FM system for a four-week period and/or to conducting auditory training over an eight-week period, as determined through interview.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Asymmetric pure tone thresholds (left-right difference > 15 dB HL at frequencies of 500 through 4000 Hz),
  • Presence of neurological, psychiatric or physical disorders, or co-morbid diseases that would prevent completion of the study as determined by chart review,
  • Best corrected vision worse than 20/63 as measured with the Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance (SKILL) Card

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation factorielle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: FM System
Provision of FM assistive device
Dispositif: FM system
Frequency modulation assistive device
Expérimental: Auditory Training
Provision of auditory training
Comportemental: Auditory training
Participation in computerized auditory training program for eight weeks
Expérimental: FM System and Auditory Training
Provision of FM assistive device and auditory training
Dispositif: FM system
Frequency modulation assistive device
Comportemental: Auditory training
Participation in computerized auditory training program for eight weeks
Aucune intervention: Standard-of-Care
Standard-of-care informational counseling

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Competence Score From the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12
Assesses the impact a rehabilitative intervention has on perceived Competence (perceived functional capability, independence and performance). Responses are reported on a 7-point scale that ranges from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact). The mid-point, zero, indicates no impact or no perceived change
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12
Stroop Color and Word Test
Délai: Baseline and Immediately post-intervention (between weeks 8 and 12).
Measure of processing interference that assesses the ability to cope with cognitive stress and process complex input. It consists of a Word Page with color words printed in black ink, a Color Page with 'Xs' printed in color, and a Color-Word Page with words from the first page printed in colors from the second page (the color and the word do not match). The test-taker looks at each sheet and moves down the columns, reading words or naming the ink colors as quickly as possible within a time limit. Interference raw scores were converted into t-scores for analysis. T-score benefit was the analytic metric used. T-score benefit = post-intervention score minus baseline score
Baseline and Immediately post-intervention (between weeks 8 and 12).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Hearing in Noise Test
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Hearing In Noise Test assesses speech understanding in noise assessed. Sentences are presented in a background of noise. The signal to noise ratio is varied adaptively to obtained the signal to noise ratio at which participants can correctly repeat back 50% of sentences presented in speech-shaped noise is determined. A lower signal to noise ratio indicates better performance.
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Staggered Spondaic Word Test
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Dichotic listening test in which two spondaic words are presented, one to each ear of the listener, in an overlapping fashion such that the first syllable of the first word is presented in isolation, the second syllable of the first word is presented simultaneously with the first syllable of the second word, and the second syllable of the second word is presented in isolation. Total number of test spondee pairs = 40.
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Digit Span Score Measure of Auditory Working Memory
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
The Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3rd edition (WAIS-III) assessed auditory working memory. It consists of a Digit Span Forward task in which individuals to repeat numbers in the same sequence as they were presented verbally, and a Digit Span Backward task in which individuals repeat back the numbers in the reverse order to which they were heard. Data are summed to compute a Digit Span total score. Possible range of scores is 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Time Compressed Speech Test (TCST)
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
the TCST assessed speech recognition for speeded speech. Sentences are presented in the sound field in quiet at with 50% and 60% time compression. Participants repeat back each sentence after it is presented.
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Cognitive Self Report Questionnaire (CSRQ).
Délai: Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
CSRQ assesses self-reported cognitive difficulties in 8 domains: Attention, Executive function, Memory, Language, Vision, Hearing, Energy,and Satisfaction. Participants respond on a 3-point Likert scale whether they perceived they improved, remained the same, or got worse as a result of an intervention. Total score is computed by summing scores on each subscale. Range for total score = -64 to +64, with higher scores indicating fewer reported cognitive difficulties.
Immediately post-intervention between weeks 8 and 12.
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale-comparative (SSQ-C)
Délai: Immediately post-intervention
Three subscale questionnaire that examines reported change in auditory disability for Speech, Spatial hearing and Quality of sounds. Subjects respond on a scale of -5 ('much worse') to +5 (much better) to indicate the change in difficulties following an intervention they have hearing in specific situations, with a lower number indicating greater difficulty. Results are presented for average total SSQ-C score which can range from -5 to +5, with higher scores indicating greater improvement.
Immediately post-intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

US Department of Veterans Affairs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Gabrielle Saunders, VA Medical Center, Portland

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2010

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 octobre 2012

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 décembre 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 juin 2009

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juin 2009

Première publication (Estimation)

30 juin 2009

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

11 juin 2014

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 juin 2014

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2014

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • C7054-R
  • 02386 (Autre identifiant: Portland VA IRB)
  • 11-1808 (Autre identifiant: Portland VA IRB)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Lésion cérébrale traumatique

Essais cliniques sur FM system

Rechercher des essais similaires

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

CROs by country

CROs in Myanmar

Conditions

Maladies rares

Interventions en matière de drogue

Compléments alimentaires

Commanditaire / collaborateurs

Emplacements

3
S'abonner