- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT01866501
Étude de suivi validant une technique mixte
Une étude de suivi validant une technique mixte pour identifier le site d'insertion de l'accès vasculaire intra-osseux de l'humérus proximal
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Texas
-
Spring Branch, Texas, États-Unis, 78070
- Bulverde-Spring Branch EMS
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Critère d'intégration:
- Techniciens en médecine d'urgence, ambulanciers paramédicaux ou infirmiers actuellement agréés/certifiés N'ont reçu aucune formation formelle sur l'utilisation du site d'insertion IO de l'humérus proximal
Critère d'exclusion:
- Formation antérieure sur la mise en place d'un accès vasculaire intra-osseux humérus proximal
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Autre: Blended Technique for Intraosseous Insertion
Clinician device operators will be trained on the Blended Technique site identification method and perform one unilateral proximal humerus (PH) intraosseous needle insertion.
The blended technique is: The arm is positioned with the elbow adducted and shoulder internally rotated with the hand over the abdomen.
The operator places one hand in the axilla and the other hand along the midline of the upper arm laterally, to define the anterior and posterior borders.
The vertical plane of insertion lies in the middle of these borders.
Along the vertical axis, deeply palpate the PH until the junction of the surgical neck and humeral head is identified.
The insertion site is the greater tubercle, about 1-2 cm superior to the surgical neck.
Secondary confirmation is made by palpating the inter-tubercular groove with a 90º rotation of the arm, confirming the insertion site is lateral to the groove, and returning the arm back to a medially rotated position with the hand over the abdomen
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Autres noms:
|
|
Autre: Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique
Healthy subjects will receive bilateral intraosseous vascular access established in the proximal humerus performed by device operators using the blended technique.
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score
Délai: Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
X-ray images of the inserted IO needle will be used to evaluate placement success and scored. Each insertion is scored by a musculoskeletal radiologist for two measures: Insertion Site Accuracy (scale range 0 - 3) and Needle Tip Location (scale range -7 to 7) as described below. The Total score is the sum of Insertion Site Accuracy Score and Needle Tip Location Score. Scale range -7 to 10; higher score indicates greater accuracy. Insertion Site Accuracy Score Scale is 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate greater accuracy: 3=center of greater tubercle, 2=perimeter of greater tubercle, 1=junction of greater tubercle and shaft or head, and 0=outside the greater tubercle. Needle tip Location Score Scale ranges from -7 to 7 where higher scores indicate more favorable needle tip location: 7=within center of proximal humerus (PH), 5=within PH not centered, 3= Near miss of PH, -3=In humeral head, -3=on epiphyseal line, -5=lateral miss (of the humerus), -7=medial miss (of the humerus). |
Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
|
Time to Intraosseous Catheter Placement
Délai: 1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
The amount of time it takes for the device operator to identify the proximal humerus intraosseous (IO) insertion site using their assigned proximal humerus IO site identification method and insert the IO needle.
Timing starts from the time the participant begins to palpate the proximal humerus and stops when the IO needle is inserted.
|
1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Délai: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Délai: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Délai: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Délai: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraosseous Infusion Flow Rates
Délai: Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
Intraosseous infusion flow rates attained at tested infusion pressures, which may include Gravity; 100 mmHg, 200 mmHg and 300 mmHg.
|
Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
|
Time in Seconds for Fluid Delivery From the Proximal Humerus to the Heart
Délai: Day 1 after IO insertion
|
Time in seconds for fluid delivery from the proximal humerus to the heart, using visualization of contrast injection under fluoroscopy was performed and measured once for the participants in the Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique arm.
|
Day 1 after IO insertion
|
|
Success Rate of Obtaining Laboratory Results for Both Intraosseous and Peripheral Venous Specimens
Délai: Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Number of Participants with Laboratory Results Successfully Obtained from both intraosseous (IO) and peripheral venous blood specimens.
Success was determined if the point-of-care laboratory analysis system provided laboratory results values for both IO and Peripheral Venous specimens.
It was deemed unsuccessful if the point-of-care system provided no laboratory results values and/or noted an error for at least one specimen.
An intraosseous blood specimen and a peripheral venous blood specimen were collected from each subject
|
Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Larry J Miller, MD, Vidacare Corporation
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimé)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2013-06 (AP HM)
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .