- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT01866501
Estudo de Acompanhamento Validando uma Técnica Combinada
Um estudo de acompanhamento validando uma técnica combinada para identificar o local de inserção do acesso vascular intraósseo do úmero proximal
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Texas
-
Spring Branch, Texas, Estados Unidos, 78070
- Bulverde-Spring Branch EMS
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Critério de inclusão:
- Técnicos de medicina de emergência atualmente licenciados/certificados, paramédicos ou enfermeiros Não tiveram treinamento formal sobre o uso do local de inserção IO do úmero proximal Demonstrar o uso adequado do dispositivo e da técnica durante a parte do treinamento e obter aprovação do instrutor do dispositivo para participar
Critério de exclusão:
- Treinamento prévio sobre estabelecimento de acesso vascular intraósseo proximal do úmero
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: Não randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Outro: Blended Technique for Intraosseous Insertion
Clinician device operators will be trained on the Blended Technique site identification method and perform one unilateral proximal humerus (PH) intraosseous needle insertion.
The blended technique is: The arm is positioned with the elbow adducted and shoulder internally rotated with the hand over the abdomen.
The operator places one hand in the axilla and the other hand along the midline of the upper arm laterally, to define the anterior and posterior borders.
The vertical plane of insertion lies in the middle of these borders.
Along the vertical axis, deeply palpate the PH until the junction of the surgical neck and humeral head is identified.
The insertion site is the greater tubercle, about 1-2 cm superior to the surgical neck.
Secondary confirmation is made by palpating the inter-tubercular groove with a 90º rotation of the arm, confirming the insertion site is lateral to the groove, and returning the arm back to a medially rotated position with the hand over the abdomen
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Outros nomes:
|
|
Outro: Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique
Healthy subjects will receive bilateral intraosseous vascular access established in the proximal humerus performed by device operators using the blended technique.
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score
Prazo: Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
X-ray images of the inserted IO needle will be used to evaluate placement success and scored. Each insertion is scored by a musculoskeletal radiologist for two measures: Insertion Site Accuracy (scale range 0 - 3) and Needle Tip Location (scale range -7 to 7) as described below. The Total score is the sum of Insertion Site Accuracy Score and Needle Tip Location Score. Scale range -7 to 10; higher score indicates greater accuracy. Insertion Site Accuracy Score Scale is 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate greater accuracy: 3=center of greater tubercle, 2=perimeter of greater tubercle, 1=junction of greater tubercle and shaft or head, and 0=outside the greater tubercle. Needle tip Location Score Scale ranges from -7 to 7 where higher scores indicate more favorable needle tip location: 7=within center of proximal humerus (PH), 5=within PH not centered, 3= Near miss of PH, -3=In humeral head, -3=on epiphyseal line, -5=lateral miss (of the humerus), -7=medial miss (of the humerus). |
Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
|
Time to Intraosseous Catheter Placement
Prazo: 1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
The amount of time it takes for the device operator to identify the proximal humerus intraosseous (IO) insertion site using their assigned proximal humerus IO site identification method and insert the IO needle.
Timing starts from the time the participant begins to palpate the proximal humerus and stops when the IO needle is inserted.
|
1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Prazo: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Prazo: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Prazo: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Prazo: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraosseous Infusion Flow Rates
Prazo: Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
Intraosseous infusion flow rates attained at tested infusion pressures, which may include Gravity; 100 mmHg, 200 mmHg and 300 mmHg.
|
Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
|
Time in Seconds for Fluid Delivery From the Proximal Humerus to the Heart
Prazo: Day 1 after IO insertion
|
Time in seconds for fluid delivery from the proximal humerus to the heart, using visualization of contrast injection under fluoroscopy was performed and measured once for the participants in the Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique arm.
|
Day 1 after IO insertion
|
|
Success Rate of Obtaining Laboratory Results for Both Intraosseous and Peripheral Venous Specimens
Prazo: Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Number of Participants with Laboratory Results Successfully Obtained from both intraosseous (IO) and peripheral venous blood specimens.
Success was determined if the point-of-care laboratory analysis system provided laboratory results values for both IO and Peripheral Venous specimens.
It was deemed unsuccessful if the point-of-care system provided no laboratory results values and/or noted an error for at least one specimen.
An intraosseous blood specimen and a peripheral venous blood specimen were collected from each subject
|
Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Larry J Miller, MD, Vidacare Corporation
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimado)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2013-06 (AP HM)
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .