- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT01866501
Oppfølgingsstudie som validerer en blandet teknikk
En oppfølgingsstudie som validerer en blandet teknikk for å identifisere den proksimale Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Insertion Site
Studieoversikt
Status
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Texas
-
Spring Branch, Texas, Forente stater, 78070
- Bulverde-Spring Branch EMS
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inklusjonskriterier:
- For tiden lisensierte/sertifiserte akuttmedisinske teknikere, ambulansepersonell eller sykepleier Har ikke hatt noen formell opplæring i bruk av det proksimale humerus IO-innsettingsstedet. Demonstrere riktig bruk av enheten og teknikken under treningsdelen og få godkjenning fra enhetstreneren for å delta
Ekskluderingskriterier:
- Tidligere opplæring i etablering av proksimal humerus intraossøs vaskulær tilgang
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Annen
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Annen: Blended Technique for Intraosseous Insertion
Clinician device operators will be trained on the Blended Technique site identification method and perform one unilateral proximal humerus (PH) intraosseous needle insertion.
The blended technique is: The arm is positioned with the elbow adducted and shoulder internally rotated with the hand over the abdomen.
The operator places one hand in the axilla and the other hand along the midline of the upper arm laterally, to define the anterior and posterior borders.
The vertical plane of insertion lies in the middle of these borders.
Along the vertical axis, deeply palpate the PH until the junction of the surgical neck and humeral head is identified.
The insertion site is the greater tubercle, about 1-2 cm superior to the surgical neck.
Secondary confirmation is made by palpating the inter-tubercular groove with a 90º rotation of the arm, confirming the insertion site is lateral to the groove, and returning the arm back to a medially rotated position with the hand over the abdomen
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Andre navn:
|
|
Annen: Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique
Healthy subjects will receive bilateral intraosseous vascular access established in the proximal humerus performed by device operators using the blended technique.
|
Intraossesous Vascular Access in the proximal humerus
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score
Tidsramme: Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
X-ray images of the inserted IO needle will be used to evaluate placement success and scored. Each insertion is scored by a musculoskeletal radiologist for two measures: Insertion Site Accuracy (scale range 0 - 3) and Needle Tip Location (scale range -7 to 7) as described below. The Total score is the sum of Insertion Site Accuracy Score and Needle Tip Location Score. Scale range -7 to 10; higher score indicates greater accuracy. Insertion Site Accuracy Score Scale is 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate greater accuracy: 3=center of greater tubercle, 2=perimeter of greater tubercle, 1=junction of greater tubercle and shaft or head, and 0=outside the greater tubercle. Needle tip Location Score Scale ranges from -7 to 7 where higher scores indicate more favorable needle tip location: 7=within center of proximal humerus (PH), 5=within PH not centered, 3= Near miss of PH, -3=In humeral head, -3=on epiphyseal line, -5=lateral miss (of the humerus), -7=medial miss (of the humerus). |
Day 1 Within 10 minutes following procedure
|
|
Time to Intraosseous Catheter Placement
Tidsramme: 1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
The amount of time it takes for the device operator to identify the proximal humerus intraosseous (IO) insertion site using their assigned proximal humerus IO site identification method and insert the IO needle.
Timing starts from the time the participant begins to palpate the proximal humerus and stops when the IO needle is inserted.
|
1 day, within 10 minutes of procedure
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Tidsramme: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing training
|
|
Level of Confidence Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Tidsramme: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators scored their perceived Level of Confidence with their assigned Intraosseous (IO) Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Level of Confidence scale scores range from 1 to 5, where.
1=not at all confident, 2=slightly confident, 3=moderately confident, 4=very confident, and 5=extremely confident.
Higher scores indicate greater level of confidence.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Pre-intraosseous Insertion
Tidsramme: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported following the completion of training but before performing the unilateral IO insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion
|
|
Ease of Use Score Post-intraosseous Insertion
Tidsramme: Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Device operators will score their perceived Ease of Use for their assigned Intraosseous Insertion method for their one unilateral proximal humerus IO site procedure.
The score was reported after completing the unilateral intraosseous insertion.
The Ease of Use scale scores range from 1 to 5, where 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=neutral, 4=easy, and 5=very easy.
Higher scores indicate greater ease of use.
|
Day 1 within 10 minutes of completing the unilateral insertion
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraosseous Infusion Flow Rates
Tidsramme: Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
Intraosseous infusion flow rates attained at tested infusion pressures, which may include Gravity; 100 mmHg, 200 mmHg and 300 mmHg.
|
Day 1 after establishing IO vascular access
|
|
Time in Seconds for Fluid Delivery From the Proximal Humerus to the Heart
Tidsramme: Day 1 after IO insertion
|
Time in seconds for fluid delivery from the proximal humerus to the heart, using visualization of contrast injection under fluoroscopy was performed and measured once for the participants in the Healthy Subjects: Blended Technique arm.
|
Day 1 after IO insertion
|
|
Success Rate of Obtaining Laboratory Results for Both Intraosseous and Peripheral Venous Specimens
Tidsramme: Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Number of Participants with Laboratory Results Successfully Obtained from both intraosseous (IO) and peripheral venous blood specimens.
Success was determined if the point-of-care laboratory analysis system provided laboratory results values for both IO and Peripheral Venous specimens.
It was deemed unsuccessful if the point-of-care system provided no laboratory results values and/or noted an error for at least one specimen.
An intraosseous blood specimen and a peripheral venous blood specimen were collected from each subject
|
Day 1 within 30 minutes after establishing proximal humerus IO vascular access and peripheral venous access
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Larry J Miller, MD, Vidacare Corporation
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Antatt)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 2013-06 (AP HM)
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .