- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT05471843
Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Une étude de phase 2 multicentrique, ouverte et à un seul bras pour évaluer l'efficacité, l'innocuité et la pharmacocinétique de l'inhibiteur de Bcl-2 BGB-11417 chez des patients atteints d'un lymphome à cellules du manteau récidivant ou réfractaire
The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- Phase 2
- La phase 1
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Cologne, Allemagne, 50937
- Universitatsklinikum Koln, Innere Medizin I
-
Düsseldorf, Allemagne, 40225
- Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf
-
-
-
-
-
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentine, C1118AAT
- Hospital Aleman
-
-
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgique, 3000
- University Hospitals Leuven
-
-
-
-
-
Curitiba, Brésil, 81520-060
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner
-
Porto Alegre, Brésil, 90110-270
- Hospital Mae de Deus
-
Ribeirão Preto, Brésil, 14051-140
- Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto Usp
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brésil, 22775-001
- Instituto Americas Ensino, Pesquisa E Inovacao
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brésil, 22250-040
- Oncoclinicas Rio de Janeiro Sa
-
Salvador, Brésil, 41253-190
- Hospital Sao Rafael (Rede Dor)
-
São Paulo, Brésil, 05652-900
- Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Hospital Albert Einstein
-
São Paulo, Brésil, 01508-010
- Accamargo Cancer Center
-
São Paulo, Brésil, 05402-000
- Hcfmusp Servico de Hematologia, Hemoterapia E Terapia Celular
-
São Paulo, Brésil, 01401-004
- Instituto Dor de Pesquisa E Ensino Sao Paulo
-
São Paulo, Brésil, 01323-001
- Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
-
-
-
-
Anhui
-
Hefei, Anhui, Chine, 230088
- Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital Aka West Branch of Anhui Province Hospital
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100142
- Beijing Cancer Hospital
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 101100
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University(Tongzhou)
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, Chine, 350014
- Fujian Cancer Hospital
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, Chine, 510060
- Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, Chine, 510120
- Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital Huifu Branch
-
-
Guangxi
-
Nanning, Guangxi, Chine, 530021
- The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
-
-
Hainan
-
Haikou, Hainan, Chine, 570206
- Hainan General Hospital
-
-
Henan
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Chine, 450052
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Chine, 450000
- Henan Cancer Hospital
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, Chine, 430030
- Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nantong, Jiangsu, Chine, 201203
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
-
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Chine, 221000
- The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
-
-
Jiangxi
-
Nanchang, Jiangxi, Chine, 330029
- Jiangxi Cancer Hospital
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, Chine, 110042
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
-
-
Ningxia
-
Yinchuan, Ningxia, Chine, 750004
- General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, Chine, 250117
- Shandong Cancer Hospital
-
Qingdao, Shandong, Chine, 266555
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Branch West Coast
-
-
Shanxi
-
Taiyuan, Shanxi, Chine, 030013
- Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, Chine, 610041
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University
-
-
Tianjin Municipality
-
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, Chine, 300060
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
-
-
Xinjiang
-
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, Chine, 830000
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Chine, 310003
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Espagne, 08035
- Hospital Universitario Vall Dhebron
-
Seville, Espagne, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
-
-
-
-
-
Le Mans, France, 72037
- Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
-
Nantes, France, 44000
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes Hotel Dieu
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Necker University Hospital
-
Paris, France, 75013
- Hopital Pitie Salpetriere Service Hematologie
-
PierreBenite, France, 69495
- Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
-
Tours, France, 37000
- Chu Tours Hopital Bretonneau Service Pneumologie 2
-
-
-
-
-
Ashdod, Israël, 7747629
- Assuta Ashdod Medical Center
-
Jerusalem, Israël, 9103102
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Meldola, Italie, 47014
- Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori Irst
-
-
-
-
-
Gdansk, Pologne, 80-214
- Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
-
Krakow, Pologne, 30-727
- Pratia McM Krakow
-
Lublin, Pologne, 20-090
- Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 W Lublinie
-
-
-
-
-
San Juan, Porto Rico, 00917
- Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
-
-
-
-
-
Headington, Royaume-Uni, OX3 7LE
- Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Trust Churchill Hospital
-
London, Royaume-Uni, NW1 2PG
- University College Hospital
-
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, Royaume-Uni, CH63 4JY
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turquie (Türkiye), 06620
- Ankara University Medical Faculty
-
Ankara, Turquie (Türkiye), 06620
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Teaching and Research Hospital
-
Tevikiye, Turquie (Türkiye), 34365
- Vkv American Hospital
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, États-Unis, 35294-0004
- University of Alabama At Birmingham Hospital
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, États-Unis, 46804
- Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, États-Unis, 70112-2618
- Tulane Cancer Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Columbia, Maryland, États-Unis, 21044-3257
- Maryland Oncology Hematology, Pa
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, États-Unis, 07601-1915
- Hackensack University Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, États-Unis, 77030-4009
- The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MCL
- Prior systemic treatments for MCL (at least one line of anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) based immune or chemoimmunotherapy and at least one kind of covalent or non-covalent adequate Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor).
- Relapsed/refractory disease
- Presence of measurable disease
- Availability of archival tissue confirming diagnosis of MCL, or willing to undergo fresh tumor biopsy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2.
- Adequate organ function
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
- Prior malignancy other than MCL within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
- Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, venetoclax/ABT-199).
- Prior autologous stem cell transplant within the last 3 months; or prior autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within the last 3 months; or prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within the last 6 months or currently has an active graft-vs-host disease requiring the use of immunosuppressants.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
- Major surgery or significant injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
- Active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 160 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 160 mg orally once a day (QD) after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Twice-weekly Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with twice-weekly dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Délai: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
|
DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug: Hematologic Toxicity:
Nonhematologic Toxicity: • Any Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions:
|
From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
|
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Adverse Events
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances. |
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax at Steady-State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
|
|
|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the IRC
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the IRC
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Survival
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) Sub-scale Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Treatment Side-Effects (TSE) Sub-scale Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.
|
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
|
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Study Director, BeOne Medicines
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Martin P, Maddocks K, Leonard JP, Ruan J, Goy A, Wagner-Johnston N, Rule S, Advani R, Iberri D, Phillips T, Spurgeon S, Kozin E, Noto K, Chen Z, Jurczak W, Auer R, Chmielowska E, Stilgenbauer S, Bloehdorn J, Portell C, Williams ME, Dreyling M, Barr PM, Chen-Kiang S, DiLiberto M, Furman RR, Blum KA. Postibrutinib outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2016 Mar 24;127(12):1559-63. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-673145. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Wang M, Schuster SJ, Phillips T, Lossos IS, Goy A, Rule S, Hamadani M, Ghosh N, Reeder CB, Barnett E, Bravo MC, Martin P. Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004). J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Nov 2;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0537-5.
- Jain P, Romaguera J, Srour SA, Lee HJ, Hagemeister F, Westin J, Fayad L, Samaniego F, Badillo M, Zhang L, Nastoupil L, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Fowler N, Wang ML. Four-year follow-up of a single arm, phase II clinical trial of ibrutinib with rituximab (IR) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Br J Haematol. 2018 Aug;182(3):404-411. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15411. Epub 2018 May 22.
- Eyre TA, Song Y, Hermine O, Shuang Y, Jurczak W, Farias JS, Mahuad C, Ozcan M, Jachimowicz RD, Chen T, Ivanova E, Li X, Man G, Bourquelot P, Vezan R, Wang M. Phase I/II Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated With Anti-CD20 Therapy and a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 2026 Jul 1:JCO2600550. doi: 10.1200/JCO-26-00550. Online ahead of print.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- BGB-11417-201
- CTR20221815 (Autre identifiant: ChinaDrugTrials)
- 2022-500687-35-00 (Ctis)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
BeOne shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved.
BeOne shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations.
Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeOne review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Délai de partage IPD
See plan description
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
See plan description
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
- RSE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .