Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

26 août 2026 mis à jour par: BeOne Medicines

Une étude de phase 2 multicentrique, ouverte et à un seul bras pour évaluer l'efficacité, l'innocuité et la pharmacocinétique de l'inhibiteur de Bcl-2 BGB-11417 chez des patients atteints d'un lymphome à cellules du manteau récidivant ou réfractaire

The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

125

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • La phase 1

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Cologne, Allemagne, 50937
        • Universitatsklinikum Koln, Innere Medizin I
      • Düsseldorf, Allemagne, 40225
        • Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentine, C1118AAT
        • Hospital Aleman
      • Leuven, Belgique, 3000
        • University Hospitals Leuven
      • Curitiba, Brésil, 81520-060
        • Hospital Erasto Gaertner
      • Porto Alegre, Brésil, 90110-270
        • Hospital Mae de Deus
      • Ribeirão Preto, Brésil, 14051-140
        • Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto Usp
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brésil, 22775-001
        • Instituto Americas Ensino, Pesquisa E Inovacao
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brésil, 22250-040
        • Oncoclinicas Rio de Janeiro Sa
      • Salvador, Brésil, 41253-190
        • Hospital Sao Rafael (Rede Dor)
      • São Paulo, Brésil, 05652-900
        • Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Hospital Albert Einstein
      • São Paulo, Brésil, 01508-010
        • Accamargo Cancer Center
      • São Paulo, Brésil, 05402-000
        • Hcfmusp Servico de Hematologia, Hemoterapia E Terapia Celular
      • São Paulo, Brésil, 01401-004
        • Instituto Dor de Pesquisa E Ensino Sao Paulo
      • São Paulo, Brésil, 01323-001
        • Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, Chine, 230088
        • Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital Aka West Branch of Anhui Province Hospital
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 101100
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University(Tongzhou)
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, Chine, 350014
        • Fujian Cancer Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Chine, 510060
        • Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Chine, 510120
        • Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital Huifu Branch
    • Guangxi
      • Nanning, Guangxi, Chine, 530021
        • The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
    • Hainan
      • Haikou, Hainan, Chine, 570206
        • Hainan General Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Chine, 450052
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Chine, 450000
        • Henan Cancer Hospital
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Chine, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, Chine, 201203
        • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Chine, 221000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, Chine, 330029
        • Jiangxi Cancer Hospital
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Chine, 110042
        • Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
    • Ningxia
      • Yinchuan, Ningxia, Chine, 750004
        • General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, Chine, 250117
        • Shandong Cancer Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, Chine, 266555
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Branch West Coast
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, Chine, 030013
        • Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, Chine, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, Chine, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    • Xinjiang
      • Ürümqi, Xinjiang, Chine, 830000
        • Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Chine, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
      • Barcelona, Espagne, 08035
        • Hospital Universitario Vall Dhebron
      • Seville, Espagne, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
      • Le Mans, France, 72037
        • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes Hotel Dieu
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Necker University Hospital
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hopital Pitie Salpetriere Service Hematologie
      • PierreBenite, France, 69495
        • Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Chu Tours Hopital Bretonneau Service Pneumologie 2
      • Ashdod, Israël, 7747629
        • Assuta Ashdod Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israël, 9103102
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Meldola, Italie, 47014
        • Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori Irst
      • Gdansk, Pologne, 80-214
        • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
      • Krakow, Pologne, 30-727
        • Pratia McM Krakow
      • Lublin, Pologne, 20-090
        • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 W Lublinie
      • San Juan, Porto Rico, 00917
        • Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
      • Headington, Royaume-Uni, OX3 7LE
        • Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Trust Churchill Hospital
      • London, Royaume-Uni, NW1 2PG
        • University College Hospital
      • Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, Royaume-Uni, CH63 4JY
        • Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
      • Ankara, Turquie (Türkiye), 06620
        • Ankara University Medical Faculty
      • Ankara, Turquie (Türkiye), 06620
        • Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Teaching and Research Hospital
      • Tevikiye, Turquie (Türkiye), 34365
        • Vkv American Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, États-Unis, 35294-0004
        • University of Alabama At Birmingham Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, États-Unis, 46804
        • Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, États-Unis, 70112-2618
        • Tulane Cancer Center
    • Maryland
      • Columbia, Maryland, États-Unis, 21044-3257
        • Maryland Oncology Hematology, Pa
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, États-Unis, 07601-1915
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, États-Unis, 77030-4009
        • The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MCL
  2. Prior systemic treatments for MCL (at least one line of anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) based immune or chemoimmunotherapy and at least one kind of covalent or non-covalent adequate Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor).
  3. Relapsed/refractory disease
  4. Presence of measurable disease
  5. Availability of archival tissue confirming diagnosis of MCL, or willing to undergo fresh tumor biopsy
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2.
  7. Adequate organ function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
  2. Prior malignancy other than MCL within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
  3. Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, venetoclax/ABT-199).
  4. Prior autologous stem cell transplant within the last 3 months; or prior autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within the last 3 months; or prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within the last 6 months or currently has an active graft-vs-host disease requiring the use of immunosuppressants.
  5. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  6. Major surgery or significant injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
  7. Active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 160 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 160 mg orally once a day (QD) after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Autres noms:
  • BGB-11417
Expérimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Autres noms:
  • BGB-11417
Expérimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Autres noms:
  • BGB-11417
Expérimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Twice-weekly Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with twice-weekly dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Autres noms:
  • BGB-11417

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Délai: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)

DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug:

Hematologic Toxicity:

  • Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia;
  • Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia lasting > 7 days or resulting in clinically significant bleeding;
  • Any Grade ≥ 4 hematological toxicities, except for Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≤ 7 days with or without treatment, Grade 4 lymphopenia, or Grade 4 leukopenia.

Nonhematologic Toxicity:

• Any Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions:

  • Laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) defined by the Howard criteria that resolves (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 3 days;
  • Individual TLS-related laboratory adverse events that resolve (≤ Grade 1or baseline) in ≤ 3 days with or without treatment;
  • Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity that resolves to ≤ Grade 2 following therapeutic intervention in ≤ 7 days;
  • Asymptomatic biochemical laboratory abnormalities that resolve (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 7 days with or without supportive care.
From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death
  • Was life-threatening
  • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
  • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
  • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Adverse Events
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances.

From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax at Steady-State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Délai: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State
Délai: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the IRC
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)
Délai: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the IRC
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the IRC
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Délai: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Overall Survival
Délai: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) Sub-scale Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Treatment Side-Effects (TSE) Sub-scale Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Délai: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status.

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Délai: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death
  • Was life-threatening
  • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
  • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
  • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Study Director, BeOne Medicines

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

5 septembre 2022

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

18 juillet 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 janvier 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

21 juillet 2022

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 juillet 2022

Première publication (Réel)

25 juillet 2022

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

BeOne shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved.

BeOne shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations.

Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeOne review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.

Délai de partage IPD

See plan description

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

See plan description

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • RSE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner