Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

26 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: BeOne Medicines

Um estudo de braço único, aberto e multicêntrico de fase 2 para avaliar a eficácia, segurança e farmacocinética do inibidor de Bcl-2 BGB-11417 em pacientes com linfoma de células do manto recidivante ou refratário

The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

125

Estágio

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 1

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Cologne, Alemanha, 50937
        • Universitatsklinikum Koln, Innere Medizin I
      • Düsseldorf, Alemanha, 40225
        • Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1118AAT
        • Hospital Aleman
      • Curitiba, Brasil, 81520-060
        • Hospital Erasto Gaertner
      • Porto Alegre, Brasil, 90110-270
        • Hospital Mae de Deus
      • Ribeirão Preto, Brasil, 14051-140
        • Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto Usp
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 22775-001
        • Instituto Americas Ensino, Pesquisa E Inovacao
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 22250-040
        • Oncoclinicas Rio de Janeiro Sa
      • Salvador, Brasil, 41253-190
        • Hospital Sao Rafael (Rede Dor)
      • São Paulo, Brasil, 05652-900
        • Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Hospital Albert Einstein
      • São Paulo, Brasil, 01508-010
        • Accamargo Cancer Center
      • São Paulo, Brasil, 05402-000
        • Hcfmusp Servico de Hematologia, Hemoterapia E Terapia Celular
      • São Paulo, Brasil, 01401-004
        • Instituto Dor de Pesquisa E Ensino Sao Paulo
      • São Paulo, Brasil, 01323-001
        • Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
      • Leuven, Bélgica, 3000
        • University Hospitals Leuven
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230088
        • Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital Aka West Branch of Anhui Province Hospital
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 101100
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University(Tongzhou)
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350014
        • Fujian Cancer Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital Huifu Branch
    • Guangxi
      • Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
        • The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
    • Hainan
      • Haikou, Hainan, China, 570206
        • Hainan General Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
        • Henan Cancer Hospital
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 201203
        • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330029
        • Jiangxi Cancer Hospital
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110042
        • Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
    • Ningxia
      • Yinchuan, Ningxia, China, 750004
        • General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250117
        • Shandong Cancer Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266555
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Branch West Coast
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 030013
        • Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    • Xinjiang
      • Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China, 830000
        • Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
      • Barcelona, Espanha, 08035
        • Hospital Universitario Vall Dhebron
      • Seville, Espanha, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Estados Unidos, 35294-0004
        • University of Alabama At Birmingham Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 46804
        • Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, Estados Unidos, 70112-2618
        • Tulane Cancer Center
    • Maryland
      • Columbia, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21044-3257
        • Maryland Oncology Hematology, Pa
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, Estados Unidos, 07601-1915
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030-4009
        • The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center
      • Le Mans, França, 72037
        • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
      • Nantes, França, 44000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes Hotel Dieu
      • Paris, França, 75015
        • Necker University Hospital
      • Paris, França, 75013
        • Hopital Pitie Salpetriere Service Hematologie
      • PierreBenite, França, 69495
        • Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
      • Tours, França, 37000
        • Chu Tours Hopital Bretonneau Service Pneumologie 2
      • Ashdod, Israel, 7747629
        • Assuta Ashdod Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 9103102
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Meldola, Itália, 47014
        • Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori Irst
      • Gdansk, Polônia, 80-214
        • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
      • Krakow, Polônia, 30-727
        • Pratia McM Krakow
      • Lublin, Polônia, 20-090
        • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 W Lublinie
      • San Juan, Porto Rico, 00917
        • Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
      • Headington, Reino Unido, OX3 7LE
        • Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Trust Churchill Hospital
      • London, Reino Unido, NW1 2PG
        • University College Hospital
      • Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, Reino Unido, CH63 4JY
        • Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
      • Ankara, Turquia (Türkiye), 06620
        • Ankara University Medical Faculty
      • Ankara, Turquia (Türkiye), 06620
        • Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Teaching and Research Hospital
      • Tevikiye, Turquia (Türkiye), 34365
        • Vkv American Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MCL
  2. Prior systemic treatments for MCL (at least one line of anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) based immune or chemoimmunotherapy and at least one kind of covalent or non-covalent adequate Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor).
  3. Relapsed/refractory disease
  4. Presence of measurable disease
  5. Availability of archival tissue confirming diagnosis of MCL, or willing to undergo fresh tumor biopsy
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2.
  7. Adequate organ function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
  2. Prior malignancy other than MCL within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
  3. Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, venetoclax/ABT-199).
  4. Prior autologous stem cell transplant within the last 3 months; or prior autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within the last 3 months; or prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within the last 6 months or currently has an active graft-vs-host disease requiring the use of immunosuppressants.
  5. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  6. Major surgery or significant injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
  7. Active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 160 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 160 mg orally once a day (QD) after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Outros nomes:
  • BGB-11417
Experimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Outros nomes:
  • BGB-11417
Experimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Outros nomes:
  • BGB-11417
Experimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Twice-weekly Ramp-up)

Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with twice-weekly dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Administered orally

Outros nomes:
  • BGB-11417

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Prazo: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)

DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug:

Hematologic Toxicity:

  • Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia;
  • Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia lasting > 7 days or resulting in clinically significant bleeding;
  • Any Grade ≥ 4 hematological toxicities, except for Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≤ 7 days with or without treatment, Grade 4 lymphopenia, or Grade 4 leukopenia.

Nonhematologic Toxicity:

• Any Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions:

  • Laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) defined by the Howard criteria that resolves (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 3 days;
  • Individual TLS-related laboratory adverse events that resolve (≤ Grade 1or baseline) in ≤ 3 days with or without treatment;
  • Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity that resolves to ≤ Grade 2 following therapeutic intervention in ≤ 7 days;
  • Asymptomatic biochemical laboratory abnormalities that resolve (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 7 days with or without supportive care.
From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death
  • Was life-threatening
  • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
  • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
  • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Adverse Events
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances.

From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax at Steady-State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Part 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Overall Survival
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) Sub-scale Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Treatment Side-Effects (TSE) Sub-scale Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status.

Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death
  • Was life-threatening
  • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
  • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
  • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Study Director, BeOne Medicines

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

5 de setembro de 2022

Conclusão Primária (Real)

18 de julho de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de janeiro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

21 de julho de 2022

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de julho de 2022

Primeira postagem (Real)

25 de julho de 2022

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

22 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

26 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

BeOne shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved.

BeOne shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations.

Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeOne review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

See plan description

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

See plan description

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • CSR

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever