- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT05471843
Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Um estudo de braço único, aberto e multicêntrico de fase 2 para avaliar a eficácia, segurança e farmacocinética do inibidor de Bcl-2 BGB-11417 em pacientes com linfoma de células do manto recidivante ou refratário
The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Fase 2
- Fase 1
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Cologne, Alemanha, 50937
- Universitatsklinikum Koln, Innere Medizin I
-
Düsseldorf, Alemanha, 40225
- Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf
-
-
-
-
-
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1118AAT
- Hospital Aleman
-
-
-
-
-
Curitiba, Brasil, 81520-060
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner
-
Porto Alegre, Brasil, 90110-270
- Hospital Mae de Deus
-
Ribeirão Preto, Brasil, 14051-140
- Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto Usp
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 22775-001
- Instituto Americas Ensino, Pesquisa E Inovacao
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 22250-040
- Oncoclinicas Rio de Janeiro Sa
-
Salvador, Brasil, 41253-190
- Hospital Sao Rafael (Rede Dor)
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 05652-900
- Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Hospital Albert Einstein
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 01508-010
- Accamargo Cancer Center
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 05402-000
- Hcfmusp Servico de Hematologia, Hemoterapia E Terapia Celular
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 01401-004
- Instituto Dor de Pesquisa E Ensino Sao Paulo
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 01323-001
- Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
-
-
-
-
-
Leuven, Bélgica, 3000
- University Hospitals Leuven
-
-
-
-
Anhui
-
Hefei, Anhui, China, 230088
- Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital Aka West Branch of Anhui Province Hospital
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100142
- Beijing Cancer Hospital
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 101100
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University(Tongzhou)
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350014
- Fujian Cancer Hospital
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
- Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
- Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital Huifu Branch
-
-
Guangxi
-
Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
- The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
-
-
Hainan
-
Haikou, Hainan, China, 570206
- Hainan General Hospital
-
-
Henan
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
- Henan Cancer Hospital
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
- Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 201203
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
-
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221000
- The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
-
-
Jiangxi
-
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330029
- Jiangxi Cancer Hospital
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110042
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
-
-
Ningxia
-
Yinchuan, Ningxia, China, 750004
- General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, China, 250117
- Shandong Cancer Hospital
-
Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266555
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Branch West Coast
-
-
Shanxi
-
Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 030013
- Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University
-
-
Tianjin Municipality
-
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China, 300060
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
-
-
Xinjiang
-
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China, 830000
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Espanha, 08035
- Hospital Universitario Vall Dhebron
-
Seville, Espanha, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, Estados Unidos, 35294-0004
- University of Alabama At Birmingham Hospital
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 46804
- Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, Estados Unidos, 70112-2618
- Tulane Cancer Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Columbia, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21044-3257
- Maryland Oncology Hematology, Pa
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, Estados Unidos, 07601-1915
- Hackensack University Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030-4009
- The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
-
-
-
Le Mans, França, 72037
- Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
-
Nantes, França, 44000
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes Hotel Dieu
-
Paris, França, 75015
- Necker University Hospital
-
Paris, França, 75013
- Hopital Pitie Salpetriere Service Hematologie
-
PierreBenite, França, 69495
- Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
-
Tours, França, 37000
- Chu Tours Hopital Bretonneau Service Pneumologie 2
-
-
-
-
-
Ashdod, Israel, 7747629
- Assuta Ashdod Medical Center
-
Jerusalem, Israel, 9103102
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Meldola, Itália, 47014
- Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori Irst
-
-
-
-
-
Gdansk, Polônia, 80-214
- Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
-
Krakow, Polônia, 30-727
- Pratia McM Krakow
-
Lublin, Polônia, 20-090
- Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 W Lublinie
-
-
-
-
-
San Juan, Porto Rico, 00917
- Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
-
-
-
-
-
Headington, Reino Unido, OX3 7LE
- Oxford University Hospitals Nhs Trust Churchill Hospital
-
London, Reino Unido, NW1 2PG
- University College Hospital
-
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, Reino Unido, CH63 4JY
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turquia (Türkiye), 06620
- Ankara University Medical Faculty
-
Ankara, Turquia (Türkiye), 06620
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Teaching and Research Hospital
-
Tevikiye, Turquia (Türkiye), 34365
- Vkv American Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MCL
- Prior systemic treatments for MCL (at least one line of anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) based immune or chemoimmunotherapy and at least one kind of covalent or non-covalent adequate Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor).
- Relapsed/refractory disease
- Presence of measurable disease
- Availability of archival tissue confirming diagnosis of MCL, or willing to undergo fresh tumor biopsy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2.
- Adequate organ function
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
- Prior malignancy other than MCL within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
- Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, venetoclax/ABT-199).
- Prior autologous stem cell transplant within the last 3 months; or prior autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within the last 3 months; or prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within the last 6 months or currently has an active graft-vs-host disease requiring the use of immunosuppressants.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
- Major surgery or significant injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
- Active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Não randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 160 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 160 mg orally once a day (QD) after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Part 1: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Daily Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with daily dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Part 2: Sonrotoclax 320 mg (Twice-weekly Ramp-up)
Participants received sonrotoclax at the target dose of 320 mg orally once a day after an approximately 4-week ramp-up schedule starting at 1 mg with twice-weekly dose increases until the target dose was reached. Participants received sonrotoclax until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. |
Administered orally
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Prazo: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
|
DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug: Hematologic Toxicity:
Nonhematologic Toxicity: • Any Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions:
|
From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
|
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Adverse Events
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances. |
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax at Steady-State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose
Prazo: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
|
|
|
Part 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State
Prazo: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
|
Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
|
|
|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level. |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)
Prazo: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the IRC
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator
Prazo: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). |
Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Overall Survival
Prazo: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) Sub-scale Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Treatment Side-Effects (TSE) Sub-scale Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Prazo: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
|
|
Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Prazo: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.
|
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
|
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Study Director, BeOne Medicines
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Martin P, Maddocks K, Leonard JP, Ruan J, Goy A, Wagner-Johnston N, Rule S, Advani R, Iberri D, Phillips T, Spurgeon S, Kozin E, Noto K, Chen Z, Jurczak W, Auer R, Chmielowska E, Stilgenbauer S, Bloehdorn J, Portell C, Williams ME, Dreyling M, Barr PM, Chen-Kiang S, DiLiberto M, Furman RR, Blum KA. Postibrutinib outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2016 Mar 24;127(12):1559-63. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-673145. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Wang M, Schuster SJ, Phillips T, Lossos IS, Goy A, Rule S, Hamadani M, Ghosh N, Reeder CB, Barnett E, Bravo MC, Martin P. Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004). J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Nov 2;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0537-5.
- Jain P, Romaguera J, Srour SA, Lee HJ, Hagemeister F, Westin J, Fayad L, Samaniego F, Badillo M, Zhang L, Nastoupil L, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Fowler N, Wang ML. Four-year follow-up of a single arm, phase II clinical trial of ibrutinib with rituximab (IR) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Br J Haematol. 2018 Aug;182(3):404-411. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15411. Epub 2018 May 22.
- Eyre TA, Song Y, Hermine O, Shuang Y, Jurczak W, Farias JS, Mahuad C, Ozcan M, Jachimowicz RD, Chen T, Ivanova E, Li X, Man G, Bourquelot P, Vezan R, Wang M. Phase I/II Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated With Anti-CD20 Therapy and a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 2026 Jul 1:JCO2600550. doi: 10.1200/JCO-26-00550. Online ahead of print.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- BGB-11417-201
- CTR20221815 (Outro identificador: ChinaDrugTrials)
- 2022-500687-35-00 (Ctis)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
BeOne shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved.
BeOne shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations.
Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeOne review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
See plan description
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
See plan description
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CSR
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .