Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Doppia ablazione termica profilattica e chiusura completa dopo resezione endoscopica della mucosa di polipi colorettali non peduncolati di grandi dimensioni: uno studio randomizzato e controllato (ABLATION)

Doppia ablazione termica profilattica e chiusura completa dopo resezione endoscopica della mucosa di polipi colorettali non peduncolati di grandi dimensioni: uno studio randomizzato e controllato - (HAPC-RCT)

Large (≥20mm) colorectal polyps often harbor areas of advanced neoplasia, making them immediate colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. Such polyps have to be completely removed to prevent CRC and to avoid surgery and/or adjuvant therapy. The laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) are removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, recurrence is common. New techniques for LSL resection (hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation) have shown a reduction in recurrence following the interventions.

We hypothesize that performing hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation during EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs will lead to lower rates of lesion recurrence compared to Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) margin ablation.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

This trial is an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients undergoing EMR will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo additional STSC margin ablation (control group and current standard of care) or h-APC ablation of the margins and base (experimental group).

Patients will be enrolled in the study before the endoscopy procedure, or in the outpatient clinic.

Eligible patients who have consented to participate in the study will be asked to take a standard colonoscopy preparation regimen before their scheduled procedure.

EMR intervention will be performed for all eligible patients with a large laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) by expert endoscopists. Only if a polyp meets inclusion criteria, the study subject will be enrolled and randomized into one of these 2 groups:

  • Group 1: EMR + h-APC margin and base thermal ablation
  • Group 2: EMR + STSC of the margin

The standard EMR technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps. Submucosal injection will be used to lift the polyp from the muscularis propria. Injection will be used as per the current standard of care using a contrast agent and a lifting agent (e.g., NaCl 0.9% or Voluven). Snare electrocautery resection will be facilitated until complete visible removal of the complete polyp. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery. If residual polyp tissue cannot be removed by a snare, other means such as cold snare (i.e., for small residual polyp tissue that cannot be engaged into standard snares) or avulsive methods will be used. Randomization will be performed after resection is complete and before thermal ablation. After the complete removal of the polyp, depending on the randomization group, h-APC or STSC techniques will be used for margin and base or only margin ablation of the post-EMR defect.

If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the study polyp will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distal and 3 cm proximal to the lesion, to clearly identify the study polyp associated scar in the follow-up colonoscopy. Polyps will be sent to the pathology lab and evaluated according to standard practice by institutional pathologists. To determine the homogeneity and depth of h-APC margin ablation in the pathology lab, some ablated margins might be resected using the standard cold snare technique.

Telephone calls after 14 days following the EMR will be conducted to assess possible adverse events that occurred within the first 14 days after EMR.

Follow-up 1: Surveillance colonoscopy occurring 6 months after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) following the intervention (h-APC) and the control (STSC) techniques.

Follow-up 2: Surveillance colonoscopy at 18 months (± 6 months) after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) at FU1.

Patients with visible recurrence at the EMR site will undergo additional resection for complete eradication of recurrence. Patients with no visible but pathology-confirmed recurrence will be rescheduled for another colonoscopy with subsequent treatment of the post-EMR site and another follow-up colonoscopy for biopsies and confirmation of complete/incomplete eradication within 18 months after the initial EMR.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

892

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Reclutamento
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Daniel Von Renteln, MD
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult ≥18 years old
  • patients undergoing EMR for a large (≥20mm) colorectal LSL
  • patients providing written and informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inflammatory bowel disease;
  • non-elective colonoscopy;
  • poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >III);
  • coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ratio ≥1.5 or platelets <50 x 109/L);
  • pedunculated polyps (Paris class Ip, Isp);
  • overt signs of deep submucosal invasive cancer (JNET 3);
  • biopsy proven invasive carcinoma in a potential study polyp.
  • Pregnant women

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Prevenzione
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR)+Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin and base of the polypectomy site will be performed using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC, Erbe Hybrid APC).

The hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) combines an ablation technique (APC) with the option for submucosal saline injection using a high-pressure water jet. The technique allows for the lifting of dysplastic epithelium, creating a cushion under the mucosa to facilitate the ablation of larger areas more thoroughly and with higher energy settings, while posing a low risk for side effects or complications.

Altri nomi:
  • h-APC
Comparatore attivo: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) + Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)

Standard endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps, utilizing submucosal injection. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery (e.g., ERBE VIO Endocut 3-1-6). Ablation of the margin of the polypectomy site will be performed using Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC).

The Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) involves using a snare to remove polyps, while simultaneously applying soft coagulation to the surrounding tissue using a specialized tip on the snare.

Altri nomi:
  • STSC

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by visual recurrence or pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

4 years
Technical success of STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Technical success of STSC or h-APC defined as achieving a complete uninterrupted ring ofcircumferential margin ablation for STSC and h-APC, without crossover to complete the margin ablation, and achieving 100% surface ablation of the resection base for h-APC.

4 years
Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC

4 years
High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period.
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period at the resection site.

4 years
CRC occurrence during the 18-month follow-up period
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

CRC occurrence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period

4 years

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Tempo di ablazione STSC o h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 4 anni
4 anni
Perdita al follow-up
Lasso di tempo: 4 anni
4 anni
Tempo di chiusura del difetto
Lasso di tempo: 4 anni
4 anni
Costi associati alle procedure
Lasso di tempo: 4 anni
4 anni
Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, defined as no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.

4 years
EMR procedure time
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

EMR procedure time with STSC or h-APC

4 years
Intestinal preservation 18 months after ablation
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Defined as no surgical resection performed.

4 years
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the proximal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Proximal defined as proximal to the splenic flexure.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the distal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Distal defined as splenic flexure and distal.

14 days
Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the entire colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 14 days

Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention.

14 days
Delayed perforation after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 14 days

Delayed perforation defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract

14 days
Any delayed bleeding after EMR
Lasso di tempo: 14 days

Any delayed bleeding after EMR, defined as blood per rectum after the procedure

14 days
Technical success for complete defect closure
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Defined as adequate apposition of the mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas >3 mm along the closure line.

4 years
Factors associated with recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods
Lasso di tempo: 4 years

Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. Factors such as age, sex, lesion size (20-29mm, ≥30mm; 20-39mm, ≥40mm), histology, location, difficulty (difficult defined as peri-appendiceal, on the ileocecal valve, resection previously attempted and failed by a referring endoscopist), use of epinephrine in submucosal injection, submucosal lifting solution, resection type (en bloc [i.e. in one piece] vs piecemeal), technical success, study site, endoscopist yearly EMR volume, presence of intraprocedural bleeding, utilization of adjunct resection methods, ileocecal or anus involvement, polyp histology/morphology will be evaluated.

4 years
Factors associated with adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC
Lasso di tempo: 30 days

Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). Factors such as age, sex, lesion size, morphology, histology, location, complete/incomplete/no defect closure, prophylactic vessel ablation, base ablation, anticoagulant use will be evaluated

30 days

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

19 luglio 2024

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 ottobre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 aprile 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

15 febbraio 2024

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

15 febbraio 2024

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

22 febbraio 2024

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

18 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

17 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • HAPC-RCT

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices).

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Beginning 12 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Proposals should be directed to daniel.von.renteln.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca . To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • CODICE_ANALITICO
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .