Effects of Velocity-based Training on Physical Fitness and Skills Performance Among Aerobic Gymnast Athletes in Henan, China
The main objective of this study is to examine the effect of 8 weeks of Velocity-based training on physical fitness and aerobic gymnastics skills performance among college aerobic gymnastics athletes in Henan, China
- To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on selected fitness components in terms of power, strength, speed, agility, balance, endurance, coordination, and flexibility among aerobic gymnast athletes in Henan, China.
- To evaluate the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1 and posttest 2 on selected parameters of gymnast athletes skills in Group A Floor Elements (Family 1 Dynamic Strength: A-Frame, Family 2 Static Strength: Support, Family 3 Leg Circle: Helicopter), Group B Airborne Elements (Family 4 Dynamic Jump: Air Turn, Family 5 Form Jump: Cossack, Family 6 Split Leap: Switch Split ), and Group C Stanning Elements(Family Turns: Turn) of aerobic gymnasts from Henan, China.
- To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on the skills performance of aerobic gymnasts in terms of scoring routines.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Stato
Condizioni
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Intervento / Trattamento
Tipo di studio
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Iscrizione
Fase
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Henan
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Cina, 450000
- Velocity-based training
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
Accetta volontari sani
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- College aerobics athletes.
- Participants must have received at least one year of training in a Henan provincial college training team and be a formal aerobic gymnast in a Shandong provincial college.
- Participants must have participated in the Henan provincial aerobic gymnastics national team selection competition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants have high levels of asymmetry due to congenital physical dysplasia (Smith, 2020).
- History of sports injuries within the past year and continuous treatment.
- Participants who cannot complete the entire experimental training due to participating in the professional competition schedule.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Scienza basilare
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Numero di armi
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / ArmGruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / TrattamentoIntervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Velocity-Based Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week velocity-based resistance training (VBT) intervention, in which training loads were prescribed and adjusted in real time according to movement velocity feedback.
|
Velocity-based training (VBT) is a resistance training method in which training loads are prescribed and adjusted in real time based on movement velocity feedback (kinematic outcomes).
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Control Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training intervention following standard training protocols without velocity monitoring.
|
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training program following the athletes' standard training schedule, without velocity monitoring or feedback.
Altri nomi:
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Strength: One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press and Back Squat
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Maximal upper-body strength (1RM bench press) and lower-body strength (1RM back squat) were each assessed using standardised one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing protocols.
Values are reported separately for bench press and back squat, both in kilograms (kg).
Higher values indicate greater maximal strength.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Power: Standing Long Jump Distance
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Power was assessed using the standing long jump (SLJ) test, measured as horizontal jump distance in centimetres (cm) using a tape measure.
Higher values indicate greater lower-body power.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Speed: 30-Metre Sprint Time
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Linear sprinting speed was assessed using a 30-metre sprint test, timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s).
Lower values indicate faster sprint speed (better performance).
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Agility: Illinois Agility Test Time
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Change-of-direction agility was assessed using the Illinois Agility Test (IAT), timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s).
Lower values indicate better agility performance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Endurance: Trunk Flexor Test Time
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Endurance was assessed using the Trunk Flexor Test (TFT), a timed isometric hold test recorded in seconds (s) using a stopwatch.
Higher values indicate greater muscular endurance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Balance: Y-Balance Test Composite Reach Distance
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-Balance Test (YBT), with composite reach distance measured in centimetres (cm) using the Y-Balance Test instrument.
Higher values indicate better dynamic balance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Coordination: Wall-Toss Test Successful Catches
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Upper-limb neuromuscular coordination was assessed using the Wall-Toss Test (WTT), recorded as the number of successful ball catches completed within a fixed 30-second trial.
Higher values indicate better coordination.
Note: this measure is a count of catches, not a time-based measurement.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Flexibility: Sit-and-Reach Distance
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Flexibility was assessed using the Sit-and-Reach (SAR) test, measured in centimetres (cm) using a sit-and-reach box.
Higher values indicate greater flexibility.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Strength (Explosive A-Frame)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 1 Dynamic Strength difficulty element (Explosive A-Frame) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Static Strength (Straddle Planche)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 2 Static Strength difficulty element (Straddle Planche) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Leg Circle (Helicopter)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 3 Leg Circle difficulty element (Helicopter) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Jump (Scale Twist)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 4 Dynamic Jump difficulty element (Scale Twist) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Form Jump (Cossack Jump)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 5 Form Jump difficulty element (Cossack Jump) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Split Leap (Scissors Leap Turn)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 6 Split Leap difficulty element (Scissors Leap Turn) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Turn (Double Illusion)
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 7 Turn difficulty element (Double Illusion) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Overall Routine Score
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Overall competitive routine performance was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), combining Difficulty (D-Score), Execution (E-Score), and Artistry (A-Score) components.
Total score is reported in points with no fixed upper bound; higher scores indicate better overall routine performance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Collaboratori
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento primario
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Primo Inserito
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 20250908
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .