Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

A Non-Interventional Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Monotherapy

30 agosto 2018 aggiornato da: Hoffmann-La Roche

Mon-ACT: A Multi-center, Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab in Monotherapy

This observational study will evaluate the use and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in monotherapy in routine clinical practice in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible participants initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the licensed label will be followed for 6 months.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

71

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Belgio
      • Aalst, Belgio, 9300
        • ASZ Aalst
      • Ath, Belgio, 7800
        • CH EpiCURA Site Ath
      • Bruxelles, Belgio, 1020
        • CHU Brugmann (Victor Horta)
      • Bruxelles, Belgio, 1070
        • Hospital Erasme; Neurologie
      • Genk, Belgio, 3600
        • ReumaClinic
      • Gilly (Charleroi), Belgio, 6000
        • GHdC Site Saint-Joseph
      • Gosselies, Belgio, 6041
        • Clinique Notre Dame de Grâce
      • Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgio, 7100
        • CH Jolimont - Lobbes (Jolimont)
      • Kortrijk, Belgio, 8500
        • AZ Groeninge
      • Liège, Belgio, 4000
        • CHR de la Citadelle
      • Liège, Belgio, 4000
        • Clinique Saint-Joseph
      • Mons, Belgio, 7000
        • CHU Ambroise Pare
      • Oostende, Belgio, 8400
        • AZ Damiaan
      • Ottignies, Belgio, 1340
        • Clinique St Pierre asbl
      • Roeselare, Belgio, 8800
        • AZ Delta (Campus Wilgenstraat)
      • Turnhout, Belgio, 2300
        • AZ Turnhout Sint Jozef
      • Wilrijk, Belgio, 2610
        • Sint Augustinus Wilrijk

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Metodo di campionamento

Campione di probabilità

Popolazione di studio

Participants with rheumatoid arthritis initiating treatment with RoActemra/Actemra in monotherapy

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
  • Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria
  • Participants in whom the treating physician has made the decision to commence RoActemra/Actemra treatment in monotherapy in accordance with the local label and the reimbursement criteria indicating that RoActemra/Actemra can be given in monotherapy in case of methotrexate intolerance or where continued treatment with methotrexate is inappropriate; this can include participants who have received RoActemra/Actemra treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
  • Concomitant treatment with NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids is allowed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
  • Participants who have previously received RoActemra/Actemra in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
  • Participants receiving concomitant DMARD treatment for rheumatoid arthritis at baseline (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, gold compounds, cyclosporine) will be excluded from the study
  • Participants who have received treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
  • Participants with a history of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Tocilizumab
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received tocilizumab monotherapy according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
Droga: tocilizumab
Participants received tocilizumab monotherapy according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
Altri nomi:
  • Actemra

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation
Lasso di tempo: Month 6 after treatment initiation
Month 6 after treatment initiation

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Manifestations of RA at Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Systemic manifestations of RA included anemia, fatigue, conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) above upper limit of normal, rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid vasculitis and interstitial lung disease. Participants were included if they experienced at least any one of the conditions.
Baseline
Number of Participants With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Intolerance and Inadequate Response
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Participants With Inadequate Response to Other Biologics
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Baseline
Time to Addition of Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
The time to DMARD addition equals to the time (days) between tocilizumab start and first start date of DMARDs.
Month 6
Percentage of Participants Who Had DMARDs During Study
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
6 months
Number of Participants With Starting Tocilizumab After Failing DMARDs
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Participants With Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping Other Biologic Agents
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Baseline
Time to Reduction/Withdrawal of Corticosteroids
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Number of Dose Modifications Per Participant at Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Number of dose modification per participant at Month 6 was reported.
Month 6
Mean Dosing Interval Per Participant at Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Time for Restoration of Initial Dosing Regimen
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Percentage of Participants Who Were Not Adhering to Recommended Dosing Regimen
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Number of Participants Who Were Not Adhering to Recommended Management of AEs
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Percentage of Participants Still on Tocilizumab Monotherapy at Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Reason for Choice of Monotherapy at Baseline
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Baseline
Tender Joint Count (TJC)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. Tenderness was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
SJC was determined by examining 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. Swelling was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeter per hour [mm/hr]), and patient global assessment of disease activity (PGH) (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale: a score greater than (>) 5.1 indicates high disease activity; a score between 3.2 and 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity; a score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity; a score of less than (<) 2.6 is considered remission.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Month 3, 6
Clinical response assessed as per EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria was defined as clinically meaningful improvement at a particular time point. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in the DAS28 score and also on the actual DAS28 score at the time point so was more reflective of the current status of the participant. EULAR Good response: DAS28 <=3.2 and a CFB <-1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a CFB < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. EULAR No response: DAS28 ≤3.2 or CFB greater than or equal to (>=) -0.6, DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 or CFB>=-0.6 and DAS28 >5.1 or CFB >=-0.6. The DAS28 score was a measure of the participant's disease activity, based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGH, and ESR. DAS28 total scores ranged from 0 to approximately 10. Scores <2.6 = best disease control and scores >5.1 = worse disease control. A negative CFB indicated clinically meaningful improvement.
Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Month 3, 6
ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation (28 or 66/68 joint count) and other clinical and laboratory assessments. A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, PGH, PhGH (all 3 assessed at 0 [good] to 100 mm [worst] VAS scale), participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity), Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement. ACR50, ACR70, ACR90 require a 50%, 70%, 90% improvement from baseline respectively.
Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Response
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The SDAI was a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA which reflected the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and PhGH, assessed on 0-100 mm VAS where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = worst disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). SDAI total score = 0-86. A SDAI score </= 3.3 represented clinical remission, a score of between 3.4 and 11.0 represented low disease activity, a score between 11 and 26.0 represented moderate disease activity and a score > 26.0 represented high (or severe) disease.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The HAQ was a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of a participant's functional ability. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities). Each question had 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The HAQ scale was an average of all the scores and ranged from 0 to 3, where higher scores represented higher disease activity.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The VAS-fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue and 100 indicates extreme fatigue. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
The Patient Global Assessment of pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Change From Baseline in VAS-Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities. Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. AESI included- serious/medically significant infections; myocardial Infarction/acute coronary syndrome; gastrointestinal perforations; malignancies; anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity reactions; demyelinating disorders; stroke; serious/medically significant bleeding events; serious/medically significant hepatic events.
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modifications
Lasso di tempo: Month 6
Month 6
C-reactive Protein (CRP]) Level
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
CRP is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Level
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Month 3, 6
ESR is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.
Baseline, Month 3, 6

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

31 luglio 2012

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

12 dicembre 2014

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

12 dicembre 2014

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

10 ottobre 2012

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

10 ottobre 2012

Primo Inserito (Stima)

12 ottobre 2012

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 settembre 2018

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

30 agosto 2018

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2018

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • ML28269

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su tocilizumab

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Germany

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi