Placement of Novel Endoscopic Enteral Feeding Tube (LEGEND)
Placement of Novel Endoscopic Enteral Feeding Tube - A Feasibility Study
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Enteral feeding is the preferred route of nutrient delivery in hospitalized patients who cannot eat sufficiently. Placement of enteral feeding tubes carries a risk of misplacement especially in patients who are unable to fully collaborate during the tube placement due to neurological impairment and/or the presence of an artificial airway. The misplacement of a feeding tube in the airways has a high risk of severe complications, including pneumonia, mechanical damage of airways and the lung, and death. The verification of correct tube placement can be done using radiography, or interventions aimed at confirming the location of the tube tip by aspiration of gastric contents, and by auscultation during injection of air.
Approximately 20-25 % of patients treated in intensive care units are likely to need placement of a feeding tube, while undergoing mechanical ventilation and having an artificial airway. This high risk patient group would benefit from technologies allowing direct visualization of tube placement. It is also expected that direct visualization of tube placement will allow confirmation of tube placement and therefore eliminate the need of radiography (radiation).
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Bern、スイス、3010
- Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
Healthy volunteers
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- Age >18 years
Patients
- Age >18 years
- mechanically ventilated and requiring a placement of a postpyloric feeding tube on clinical indications
- Informed Consent as documented by signature of relatives
Exclusion Criteria:
Healthy volunteers and patients
- Unrepaired tracheoesophageal fistula
- history of prior esophageal or gastric surgery
- esophageal obstruction, stricture, varices or diverticulum
- esophageal or gastric perforation, gastric or esophageal bleeding
- recent oropharyngeal surgery
- cervical spine injury or anomaly
Additional exclusion criterion for patients only
• know severe coagulopathy (defined as thrombocyte count less than 30x10e9/l or International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 3)
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル:コホート
- 時間の展望:他の
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
---|---|
Volunteers
Cohort of 10 healthy subjects.
The tube will be placed and removed by a gastroenterologist experienced in performing endoscopic postpyloric tube placement.
Secondly, a second tube will be placed and removed.
|
Placement of enteral feeding tubes
|
Mechanically ventilated ICU
Cohort of 20 mechanically ventilated intensive care patients requiring a placement of a postpyloric feeding tube on clinical indications.
|
Placement of enteral feeding tubes
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Success rate of postpyloric placement, time to reach intragastric and postpyloric position, ease of insertion, handling and image quality.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
In healthy volunteers, time required to reach gastric and postpyloric placement
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Questionnaire with various positions and the time to reach the position
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In healthy volunteers, ease of insertion, handling, and image quality assessed
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In healthy volunteers, Usability of specific features - tip steerability, lens rinsing and flushing, air insufflation and fluid extraction
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value.
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Necessity of use of additional sedation/analgesia for the procedure in addition to already established sedation in the context of mechanical ventilation.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Questionnaire Yes/No and a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Ease of insertion, handling, and image quality assessed using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Usability of specific features - tip steerability, lens rinsing and flushing, air insufflation and fluid extraction.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Subjective global assessment of the intensivist on whether or not the technique is suitable for clinical use in patients.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Time required to reach gastric and postpyloric placement
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Questionnaire
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
In patients: Feasibility of the feeding through Veritract tube.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
using a visual analog scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating the best value
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Bleeding and infection related to tube placement
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
AE/SAE Questionnaire Yes/No
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Erroneous placement in larynx and trachea and associated complications (pneumothorax).
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Outcome mesured with a questionnaire Yes/No
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Injuries of the oesophagus, stomach or small intestine related to tube placement.
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Outcome mesured with a questionnaire Yes/No
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
Reflux of stomach contents during tube placement
時間枠:During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
AE/SAE Questionnaire Yes/No
|
During Intervention Visit, an average of 24 hours
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Tobias Merz, Dr. med.、Inselspital Bern, Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 16.22.CLI
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
Tube placementの臨床試験
-
Brandon HathornBaylor Heart and Vascular Institute Cardiovascular Research Review Committee完了冠動脈疾患 | 心臓弁膜症
-
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement...Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Program完了
-
Bezmialem Vakif University完了麻酔の気道合併症 | 気道吸引 | 麻酔の合併症 | 食道損傷 | 声門上気道効率 | 内視鏡の人間工学 | ERCP 気道管理七面鳥
-
Medisch Spectrum TwenteFoothills Medical Centreまだ募集していません心血管疾患 | 生活の質 | 手術 | 運動不足 | 胸骨切開オランダ
-
Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (CTSA); Eastern Association for...完了
-
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Abbott Japan Co.,Ltd完了