心肺停止患者の脈拍をチェックするためのパルス波ドップラー モードでの頸動脈超音波。
It's crucial to determine whether a pulse is present or not in patient with cardiac arrest. But more and more studies have shown that manual palpation is unreliable for detecting pulse 1-4. Failure to detect pulselessness may cause delay of chest compression and directly affect the patient's outcome. Likewise, failure to rapidly detect return of spontaneous circulation may cause prolonged chest compression and increase associated injury during resuscitation.
More and more studies have demonstrated that echo guided pulse detection is feasible 5-7. The aim of our study is to check carotid pulse via ultrasound. This is a prospective study and the patient selection is in-hospital or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A curvilinear ultrasonography transducer is used and placed transversely on either right/left carotid artery under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether the pulse is present or not. The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of clinical usage.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Taipei、台湾、100
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old, including trauma or non-trauma cardiac arrest, in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old
Exclusion Criteria:
- younger than 20 years-old
- patient who is pregnant
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル：CASE_ONLY
- 時間の展望：PROSPECTIVE
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
心停止で救急外来を受診した患者
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether carotid pulse is present |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
時間枠：5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy（e.g., no pulse under manual palpation but positive pulse-wave finding）of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
時間枠：5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the effectiveness (e.g., the time need to confirm whether pulse is present or not under manual palpation and ultrasound) of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
協力者と研究者
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation. 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1.
- Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01016-7.
- Moule P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00139-8.
- Liberman M, Lavoie A, Mulder D, Sampalis J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: errors made by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel. Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00082-9.
- Badra K, Coutin A, Simard R, Pinto R, Lee JS, Chenkin J. The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound. Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
- Simard RD, Unger AG, Betz M, Wu A, Chenkin J. The POCUS Pulse Check: A Case Series on a Novel Method for Determining the Presence of a Pulse Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
- Germanoska B, Coady M, Ng S, Fermanis G, Miller M. The reliability of carotid ultrasound in determining the return of pulsatile flow: A pilot study. Ultrasound. 2018 May;26(2):118-126. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753467. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。