脉冲波多普勒模式下的颈动脉超声检查心肺骤停患者的脉搏。
It's crucial to determine whether a pulse is present or not in patient with cardiac arrest. But more and more studies have shown that manual palpation is unreliable for detecting pulse 1-4. Failure to detect pulselessness may cause delay of chest compression and directly affect the patient's outcome. Likewise, failure to rapidly detect return of spontaneous circulation may cause prolonged chest compression and increase associated injury during resuscitation.
More and more studies have demonstrated that echo guided pulse detection is feasible 5-7. The aim of our study is to check carotid pulse via ultrasound. This is a prospective study and the patient selection is in-hospital or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A curvilinear ultrasonography transducer is used and placed transversely on either right/left carotid artery under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether the pulse is present or not. The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of clinical usage.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Taipei、台湾、100
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old, including trauma or non-trauma cardiac arrest, in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old
Exclusion Criteria:
- younger than 20 years-old
- patient who is pregnant
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 观测模型:CASE_ONLY
- 时间观点:PROSPECTIVE
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
因心脏骤停出现在急诊科的患者
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether carotid pulse is present |
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
大体时间:5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy(e.g., no pulse under manual palpation but positive pulse-wave finding)of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
大体时间:5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the effectiveness (e.g., the time need to confirm whether pulse is present or not under manual palpation and ultrasound) of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation. 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1.
- Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01016-7.
- Moule P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00139-8.
- Liberman M, Lavoie A, Mulder D, Sampalis J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: errors made by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel. Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00082-9.
- Badra K, Coutin A, Simard R, Pinto R, Lee JS, Chenkin J. The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound. Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
- Simard RD, Unger AG, Betz M, Wu A, Chenkin J. The POCUS Pulse Check: A Case Series on a Novel Method for Determining the Presence of a Pulse Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
- Germanoska B, Coady M, Ng S, Fermanis G, Miller M. The reliability of carotid ultrasound in determining the return of pulsatile flow: A pilot study. Ultrasound. 2018 May;26(2):118-126. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753467. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.