Carotis-ultralyd under pulserende doppler-tilstand for at kontrollere pulsen hos patienter med hjerte- og lungearrest.
It's crucial to determine whether a pulse is present or not in patient with cardiac arrest. But more and more studies have shown that manual palpation is unreliable for detecting pulse 1-4. Failure to detect pulselessness may cause delay of chest compression and directly affect the patient's outcome. Likewise, failure to rapidly detect return of spontaneous circulation may cause prolonged chest compression and increase associated injury during resuscitation.
More and more studies have demonstrated that echo guided pulse detection is feasible 5-7. The aim of our study is to check carotid pulse via ultrasound. This is a prospective study and the patient selection is in-hospital or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A curvilinear ultrasonography transducer is used and placed transversely on either right/left carotid artery under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether the pulse is present or not. The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of clinical usage.
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Prøveudtagningsmetode
Studiebefolkning
any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old, including trauma or non-trauma cardiac arrest, in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old
Exclusion Criteria:
- younger than 20 years-old
- patient who is pregnant
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Observationsmodeller: CASE_ONLY
- Tidsperspektiver: PROSPECTIVE
Kohorter og interventioner
Gruppe / kohorte |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Patient tilstede på akutmodtagelse med hjertestop
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether carotid pulse is present |
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
Tidsramme: 5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy（e.g., no pulse under manual palpation but positive pulse-wave finding）of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
|
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
Tidsramme: 5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the effectiveness (e.g., the time need to confirm whether pulse is present or not under manual palpation and ultrasound) of clinical usage. |
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation. 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1.
- Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01016-7.
- Moule P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00139-8.
- Liberman M, Lavoie A, Mulder D, Sampalis J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: errors made by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel. Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00082-9.
- Badra K, Coutin A, Simard R, Pinto R, Lee JS, Chenkin J. The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound. Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
- Simard RD, Unger AG, Betz M, Wu A, Chenkin J. The POCUS Pulse Check: A Case Series on a Novel Method for Determining the Presence of a Pulse Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
- Germanoska B, Coady M, Ng S, Fermanis G, Miller M. The reliability of carotid ultrasound in determining the return of pulsatile flow: A pilot study. Ultrasound. 2018 May;26(2):118-126. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753467. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 202010082RINB
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .