SYNERGIC-2 Trial (SYNchronizing, Exercises and Remedies to GaIn Cognition@Home) (SYN2)
A Home-based Personalized Multidomain RCT From the Canadian Therapeutic Platform for Multidomain Interventions to Prevent Dementia (CAN-THUMBS UP)
In Canada, 1,700,000 adults are at risk of dementia, half of them with MCI,representing one of the largest groups at risk for an incurable disease. Epidemiological evidence suggests up to 40% of dementia cases might be preventable by targeting modifiable lifestyle and cardiovascular factors. Given that current treatments cannot modify the disease, prevention is critical. SYNERGIC-2 offers a "personalized multidomain intervention" that combines physical and cognitive training, sleep, diet, and vascular-metabolic interventions in individuals with MCI to synergistically enhance their overall brain health including cognition and contributes to maintaining their independence. Importantly, interventions will be provided at home using an existing virtual platform reducing delivery complexity and expanding the accessibility to a wider population, thus decreasing potential inequities. Improving older adults' brain health and achieving even a modest two-year dementia incidence delay will have a projected saving of $218 Billion in Canada's healthcare system over 30 years.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Epidemiological evidence suggests up to 40% of potential dementia cases might be preventable by targeting modifiable lifestyle and cardiovascular factors; given that current treatments cannot modify the disease, prevention is a critical aspect. SYNERGIC-2 is the first large Canadian clinical trial using a 12-month home-based personalized multidomain lifestyle intervention to improve cognition in 550 older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a pre-dementia state. These personalized at-home interventions target 5 domains with tailored physical exercise, cognitive training, diet recommendations, sleep interventions, and vascular risk factor management and are all delivered using a digital platform. Specifically, SYNERGIC-2 will be conducted with participants in their homes using video-conference meetings to test participants and to coach them 1-on-1 through the interventions on a web-based digital platform. The effect of these combined interventions on cognition will be compared to an online-educational program Brain Health PRO (BHPro). Both interventions are part of CAN-THUMBS UP, the interventional platform of the CCNA related to Canada Dementia Research Strategy; and constitutes Canada's contribution to the World-Wide-FINGERS Network. Importantly, these interventions have been selected because there is evidence that they synergistically enhance overall brain health including cognition and contributes to maintaining independence for individuals at risk for developing dementia.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前：Frederico Faria, PhD
- 電話番号：519-646-6100
- メール：Frederico.Faria@sjhc.london.on.ca
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前：Diana Amaris
- 電話番号：45629 519-646-6100
- メール：Diana.Amaris@sjhc.london.on.ca
研究場所
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton、Alberta、カナダ、T6G 2G3
- 募集
- University of Alberta
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Richard Camicioli
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver、British Columbia、カナダ
- 募集
- University of British Columbia
-
-
New Brunswick
-
Fredericton、New Brunswick、カナダ
- 募集
- University of New Brunswick
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Chris McGibbon
-
-
Ontario
-
London、Ontario、カナダ、N6C5J1
- 募集
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, Parkwood Hospital
-
コンタクト：
- Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD
- 電話番号：42179 (519) 685-4292
- メール：mmontero@uwo.ca
-
主任研究者：
- Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD
-
Ottawa、Ontario、カナダ
- 募集
- University of Ottawa
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Sarah Fraser
-
Toronto、Ontario、カナダ
- 募集
- Baycrest Academy for Research and Education
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Howard Chertkow
-
Waterloo、Ontario、カナダ
- 募集
- University of Waterloo
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Laura Middleton
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal、Quebec、カナダ
- 募集
- Concordia University
-
コンタクト：
- Dr. Karen Li
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria
-
Ages 60-85 years.
-
Having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) defined as meeting all of the following:
- Presence of subjective memory complaints from the participant and/or informant.
- Objective impairment on cognitive tests independent of outcome measures.†
- Preserved activities of daily living assessed (>14/23 in Lawton-Brody IADL score). For the study, impairment of daily living will be assessed based on cognitive abilities, not physical abilities.
- Absence of clinical dementia per DSM-IV criteria †Objective cognitive impairment is operationalized as: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score between 16 and 25 (inclusive), and/or RAVLT delayed recall ≤6, and /or Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) =0.5
-
Have at least 1 dementia risk factors targeted by our intervention as follows: low physical activity (less than 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity per week, as per GAQ), poor diet (14-item Mediterranean Diet Assessment (MDA-14) score ≤7), insomnia or subthreshold insomnia ( Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score >7), and vascular-metabolic risk (Cardiovascular Risk Factors Aging and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) score ≥6 and/or diabetes (type I or II) and/or obesity (BMI≥30) and/or diagnosis of high blood pressure (hypertension) and/or smoking).
-
Have access to a home computer/laptop/tablet with home internet (have regular access to email) and ability to use technology (able to send and receive emails and join video conferences).
-
Self-reported levels of proficiency in English for speaking and understanding spoken and written language.
-
Have normal/corrected to normal vision in at least one eye to identify stimuli on computer/tablet screen.
-
Have normal to corrected hearing ability, in order for the participant to engage in digital/virtual communication. Research personnel will determine and assess the hearing ability as per participant's performance.
-
Able to comply with virtual visits, treatment plan, and trial-related activities.
-
Ability to participate in the study's exercise training as determined by the Get Active Questionnaire (GAQ).
Exclusion Criteria
- Having a diagnosis of dementia (based on DSM-IV criteria).
- Underlying severe disease that precludes engagement with interventions, including presence of psychiatric diagnoses (i.e., major depression (Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30) >19), schizophrenia, severe anxiety, neurological disorder with severe motor deficits, such as current parkinsonism or any neurological disorder with residual severe motor deficits (i.e., stroke with motor deficit), or presence of unstable (non-controlled e.g., symptoms that suggest instability or no treatment for their condition) chronic disease such as congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that may preclude the participant from engaging properly with the trial interventions, or advanced-stage active cancer that at the study physician's discretion will prevent them from participating.
- Having had surgery within the last 2 months or having an upcoming planned surgery in the next 12 months that could interfere with the participant's vision, hearing, mobility, or any other abilities to participate in the study.
- Regular use of Benzodiazepine or neuroleptic drugs that may interfere with the participants ability to participate in the assessments and interventions.
- Recent (in the past 12 months) and/or current substance or alcohol abuse.
- Having had a transmural myocardial infarction (severe heart attack) within six months prior to enrollment in the clinical trial that according to the study physician may preclude physical activity performance.
- Intention to enroll in other interventional clinical trials during same time.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：防止
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：SYNERGIC 2
Personalized multidomain coached 1-to-1 interventions at home (PMI@Home) including:
|
Personalized multidomain interventional program by combining tailored lifestyle interventions that targets 5 domains: physical activity, cognition, diet, sleep, and vascular risk factors. These interventions are tailored based on participants' baseline profile and progress in intensity following the principles of personalized medicine. All aspects of the PMI@home will be delivered remotely, at participants' homes, using a "digital platform" with scheduled bi-weekly 1-to1 coaching sessions. Delivery of interventions and assessments are centralized with 5 trained staff at the sponsor site (London) to assure logistics, standardization, and quality control. |
|
プラセボコンパレーター：Brain Health PRO (BHPro)
Brain Health PRO (BHPROBHPRO) is an independent, educational program with content also related to:
|
Online Modules:
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in global cognition assessed using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) with 13 items (ADASCog-13)
時間枠：baseline and at 48 weeks (after interventions finalized)
|
Global cognition will be assessed using the cognitive section of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) with 13 items (ADASCog-13). This scale consists of 13 brief cognitive tests assessing attention, memory, language, executive function, praxis, orientation, and instrumental activities of daily living. The ADAS-Cog has been a significant outcome measure in numerous trials with MCI and AD to measure changes in cognitive performance in populations with cognitive impairment, it score ranges from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating worse cognitive performance. |
baseline and at 48 weeks (after interventions finalized)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Anthropometric Measures
時間枠：Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
Measurements of weight and hip/waist circumference will be done at home and self-reported by the participant. This can be used to characterize participant's body dimension and determine body mass index as kg/m^2 which can be used to estimate whether participants have obesity. A BMI greater than 30 is the cut off for obesity. Changes in waist circumference may also indicate visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. |
Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) is a short questionnaire assessing midlife vascular risk for dementia, with scores ranging from 0 to 15 (higher scores suggesting higher risk) and has cut-off score of 5 for high risk. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in the CCNA Gait Assessments results-Walking performance
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The CCNA gait assessment includes preferred and fast pace gait, and dual-task gait that comprises walking while performing three cognitively demanding tasks: counting backwards by ones, counting backwards by sevens, and naming animals. Participants will be asked to walk on a designated walking path(4 meters) in sight of camera |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Clinical Dementia Rating scores
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a validated scale (0-3) used in longitudinal Alzheimer's Disease (AD) research to characterize the impact of cognitive decline on global function performance applicable to AD and related dementias. Information is obtained through a semi-structured interview of the patient and a reliable informant or collateral source (e.g. family member). A score of ) indicate no cognitive impairment; 0.5 for Mild cognitive impairment; 1 for early dementia; 2 for mild severe dementia; 3 for severe dementia |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Digit Symbol Modalities Test - Oral Version (mental processing speed)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Digit Symbol Modalities Test is a 90-second, timed task that asks participants to orally match geometric figures with specific numbers according to a defined key (specifying which symbols are assigned to which numbers) that is provided at the top of the stimulus page. The oral Digit Symbol Modalities Test measures processing speed capabilities. The total number of numbers correctly matched with symbols is the final score for this test ranging from 0-110 correct numbers sequentially spoken. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Eating Pattern Self-Assessment
時間枠：Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Eating Pattern Self-Assessment (EPSA) is a 12-item questionnaire assessing participants' dietary intake profiles over the past 12 months. No score provided |
Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Fall Occurrence
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The monthly falls calendar that will be sent to help track any participant falls. Participants are being asked to complete this calendar on a daily basis in order to help investigators better track whether or not they have fallen since last intervention. A fall is defined as any unintentional event in which a participant falls to the ground or onto an object (e.g., a chair) no caused by a syncope or loss of consciousness. Total number of falls and consequences of falls is provided. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
A questionnaire to score the frequency the participant experiences anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms. Score ranges from 0-21. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
A questionnaire to establish a participant's experience with depressive symptoms with higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Score ranges from 0-30. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Change in Health Utility Index (HUI-3)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The HUI-3 provides descriptive health profile measures on a generic scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life and global functionality. HUI also provides single-attribute scores of morbidities for the following attributes; vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain. Score ranges from one 1 to 6 or 1 to 5 depending on the domain; and sum of all domains could range from 8 to 45. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The HRUQ provides an overall assessment of a participants utilization of health-related resource use and costs for elderly adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.There is no scoring for the HRUQ |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Insomnia Severity Index
時間枠：Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item questionnaire assessing sleep onset, sleep maintenance, sleep satisfaction, and sleep problems. |
Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
Modified for the elderly people, assesses older adults' level of physical activity, with a simple 7-item questionnaire. Scoring ranges from low, moderate and high. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
Measures participant's ability to engage in instrumental activities of daily living via questionnaire assessing the ability to independently perform activities such as using the telephone, shopping, preparing meals, chores, household activities, managing prescriptions and medications, and managing personal finances. Score ranges from 0-23. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in the Mediterranean Diet Assessment
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
A 14-item questionnaire to help evaluate a participants Mediterranean ingredients in their diet. Score ranges from 0-14. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in global cognitive function using Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The MoCA is a brief screening instrument designed to detect global cognitive dysfunction. It assesses a range of different cognitive domains, including attention, executive functions, memory, language, visuo-constructional skills, abstract thinking, and orientation. Score ranges from 0-30. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in the Oral Trail Making Test - Attention Shifting capabilities/executive functions using
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Oral Trail Making Test (TMT) A & B is a two-part test that assesses attention speed, and mental flexibility and has been widely used in clinical settings for assessing deficits in attention and executive functioning. Score from part A ranges from 0-180; part B from 0-300 seconds. Longer times mean worse performance in the test. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Short-Form Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36) is a 36-item questionnaire assessing quality of life, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better quality of life. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)-Episodic memory
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) assesses episodic memory, in which the participant is presented with 15 words in five presentations or trials, after which they are asked to recall the words (immediately and after a delay). Score ranges from 0 to 15 words recalled. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in the Cognitive Expectancies Questionnaire
時間枠：Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
It is a version developed by the CCNA to measures participant's expectancies about the cognitive benefits of the intervention. Score ranges from 1 to 88. This questionnaire measures the participant's perception about the interventions. The questionnaire outcome is not related to participant's cognition, but participant's subjective perception about the interventions. |
Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in sleep pattern
時間枠：Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Sleep Diary is self-administered of 10-days of sleep patterns to assess sleep quality and total of sleep time. It also helps to identify possible sleep disruptions that may affect sleep quality and identify certain habits that may explain sleeping issues. |
Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in physical activity in the elderly
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The Wrist (AX3) Accelerometer is used to detect movement, vibrations, and orientation changes to assess physical activity trends in older population. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in behavior
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
This questionnaire asks about eleven health behaviors, to be rated on a 0 (low) to 10 (high) scale. Prior research has demonstrated that a 1-point change on these 0 to 10 items is clinically meaningful. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in BHPro questionnaires
時間枠：Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
These questionnaires ask about cognition (6-item questionnaire), vascular health (4-item questionnaire), and social and psychological health (8-item questionnaire).
|
Baseline, month 3, mid-intervention at 6 months, month 9, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in EEG
時間枠：Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
Participants will use the MUSE-S EEG Headband for 3 consecutive nights. The MUSE S Headband is a commercially available consumer headband that has 7 sensors, 2 on the forehead, 2 behind the ears, plus 3 reference sensors, to detect and measure EEG signals when sleeping. |
Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Identification of APO-E variants, a planned panel of 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and untargeted metabolomics
時間枠：Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
Participants will use the DNA-Genotek, which is a self-administered saliva collection kit to analyze saliva sample for possible identification of APO-E variants, a planned panel of 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and untargeted metabolomics. |
Baseline and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in Resource Use Inventory Q7 & Q8 (RUI Q7 &Q8)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
Questions 7 and 8 from the Resource Use Inventory (RUI)28 questionnaire assess health-related resource use for caregivers. This instrument has been used for tracking resource use and costs in cognitively intact older adults, as well as with Alzheimer disease (AD). This is a self-report questionnaire investigates if participants received any help while preforming daily living tasks e.g., bathing, brushing, and getting the phone. It does not provide any quantitative range score. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in 60s Chair Standing Test
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
Participants will be performing the one-minute chair stand test while being assessed via video conferencing by a research team member to evaluate mobility. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in The Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) questionnaire
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The ABC questionnaire consists of 16 questions where the participants rate their confidence that they will not lose their balance or become unsteady while performing different activities. They need to rate 16 different activities from 0 to 100, 0 being not confident at all, and 100 being completely confident on their abilities to perform the activity. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Changes in The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
The SPPB is an objective assessment tool for evaluating lower extremity functioning in older adults. Score ranges from 0 to 12. 0 being frail (disabled), and 12 being no mobility disability issues. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
時間枠：Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
Defined as the total percent of enrolled participants relative to the number of people screened for eligibility. Score is calculated as the ratio of screened and enrolled participants per month. Higher scores = better recruitment rates. |
Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
|
Retention Rate
時間枠：Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
Defined as the total percent of enrolled participants who continue throughout the trial and participate in outcomes assessments as follows:
|
Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
|
Assessment Tolerability
時間枠：Baseline
|
Defined as total percent of participants not voluntarily dropping out during baseline or between baseline assessment and prior to allocation to intervention group. |
Baseline
|
|
Adverse Events
時間枠：Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
Frequency cross-tabulation of AE severity versus AE relation to trial |
Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
|
Data Loss
時間枠：Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
Defined as data lost due to technical failures, personnel errors or participant non-compliance and is calculated as percentages. |
Throughout study completion - avg. 12 months/participant
|
|
Sex of Participant
時間枠：Baseline
|
This measurement will be self-reported. |
Baseline
|
|
Age of Participant
時間枠：Baseline
|
This measurement will be self-reported. |
Baseline
|
|
Medications Taken by Participant
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
This measurement will be self-reported. And will be reported as individuals medications and total amount. |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Chronic Diseases of Participant
時間枠：Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
This measurement will be self-reported and will be monitored throughout the trial |
Baseline, mid-intervention at 6 months, and follow-up at 12 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Manuel Montero-Odasso, MD, PhD、St. Joseph's Health Care London, Parkwood Hospital
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
- Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
- Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4.
- Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. No abstract available.
- Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.
- Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
- Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levalahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, Backman L, Hanninen T, Jula A, Laatikainen T, Lindstrom J, Mangialasche F, Paajanen T, Pajala S, Peltonen M, Rauramaa R, Stigsdotter-Neely A, Strandberg T, Tuomilehto J, Soininen H, Kivipelto M. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
- Carney CE, Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Krystal AD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. The consensus sleep diary: standardizing prospective sleep self-monitoring. Sleep. 2012 Feb 1;35(2):287-302. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1642.
- Berrigan LI, Fisk JD, Walker LA, Wojtowicz M, Rees LM, Freedman MS, Marrie RA. Reliability of regression-based normative data for the oral symbol digit modalities test: an evaluation of demographic influences, construct validity, and impairment classification rates in multiple sclerosis samples. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):281-99. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.871337. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
- Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimaki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbaek G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30. No abstract available.
- Ricker JH, Axelrod BN. Analysis of an Oral Paradigm for the Trail Making Test. Assessment. 1994 Mar;1(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1073191194001001007.
- Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Holdnack J. Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: an update. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Mar;10(2):301-3. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704102191. No abstract available.
- Schmidt M. Rey auditory verbal learning test: A handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.; 1996.
- Esther Strauss OS. Trail Making Tests. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
- Koblinsky ND, Anderson ND, Ajwani F, Parrott MD, Dawson D, Marzolini S, Oh P, MacIntosh B, Middleton L, Ferland G, Greenwood CE. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the LEAD trial: a cluster randomized controlled lifestyle intervention to improve hippocampal volume in older adults at-risk for dementia. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Feb 9;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00977-6.
- DOPPELT JE, WALLACE WL. Standardization of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale for older persons. J Abnorm Psychol. 1955 Sep;51(2):312-30. doi: 10.1037/h0044391. No abstract available.
- Peters R, Booth A, Rockwood K, Peters J, D'Este C, Anstey KJ. Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e022846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022846.
- Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Buchman AS, Barnes LL, Boyle PA, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the rush Memory and Aging Project. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012 Jul;9(6):646-63. doi: 10.2174/156720512801322663.
- Falck RS, Davis JC, Best JR, Li LC, Chan PCY, Wyrough AB, Landry GJ, Liu-Ambrose T. Buying time: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial to improve sleep quality and cognitive function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Trials. 2018 Aug 17;19(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2837-7.
- Csizmadi I, Kahle L, Ullman R, Dawe U, Zimmerman TP, Friedenreich CM, Bryant H, Subar AF. Adaptation and evaluation of the National Cancer Institute's Diet History Questionnaire and nutrient database for Canadian populations. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Jan;10(1):88-96. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007184287.
- Sala-Vila A, Valls-Pedret C, Rajaram S, Coll-Padros N, Cofan M, Serra-Mir M, Perez-Heras AM, Roth I, Freitas-Simoes TM, Domenech M, Calvo C, Lopez-Illamola A, Bitok E, Buxton NK, Huey L, Arechiga A, Oda K, Lee GJ, Corella D, Vaque-Alcazar L, Sala-Llonch R, Bartres-Faz D, Sabate J, Ros E. Effect of a 2-year diet intervention with walnuts on cognitive decline. The Walnuts And Healthy Aging (WAHA) study: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Mar 1;111(3):590-600. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz328.
- Loughrey DG, Lavecchia S, Brennan S, Lawlor BA, Kelly ME. The Impact of the Mediterranean Diet on the Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2017 Jul 14;8(4):571-586. doi: 10.3945/an.117.015495. Print 2017 Jul.
- Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;60(12):1234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
- Petrella AFM, Gill DP, Petrella RJ. Evaluation of the Get Active Questionnaire in community-dwelling older adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):587-594. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0489. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
- Cassarly C, Matthews LJ, Simpson AN, Dubno JR. The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb;41(1):95-105. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000746.
- Stephen R, Liu Y, Ngandu T, Rinne JO, Kemppainen N, Parkkola R, Laatikainen T, Paajanen T, Hanninen T, Strandberg T, Antikainen R, Tuomilehto J, Keinanen Kiukaanniemi S, Vanninen R, Helisalmi S, Levalahti E, Kivipelto M, Soininen H, Solomon A. Associations of CAIDE Dementia Risk Score with MRI, PIB-PET measures, and cognition. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(2):695-705. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170092.
- Sindi S, Calov E, Fokkens J, Ngandu T, Soininen H, Tuomilehto J, Kivipelto M. The CAIDE Dementia Risk Score App: The development of an evidence-based mobile application to predict the risk of dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Jul 2;1(3):328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.06.005. eCollection 2015 Sep.
- Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Garcia-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvado J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D, Covas MI, Schroder H, Aros F, Gomez-Gracia E, Fiol M, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Lapetra J, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Serra-Majem L, Pinto X, Munoz MA, Warnberg J, Ros E, Estruch R; PREDIMED Study Investigators. A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043134. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):113-28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006.
- Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN. Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing. 1994 May;23(3):182-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.3.182.
- Dawidowicz L, L Ash E, Korczyn AD, Andelman F, Levy S, Elkana O. Can the RAVLT predict deterioration from MCI to dementia? Data from long term follow up. Exp Aging Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;47(4):347-356. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2021.1898182. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
- Chapman JE, Cadilhac DA, Gardner B, Ponsford J, Bhalla R, Stolwyk RJ. Comparing face-to-face and videoconference completion of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in community-based survivors of stroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Sep;27(8):484-492. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19890788. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
- Takeda A, Loveman E, Clegg A, Kirby J, Picot J, Payne E, Green C. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine on cognition, quality of life and adverse events in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;21(1):17-28. doi: 10.1002/gps.1402.
- Yoshida K, Yamaoka Y, Eguchi Y, Sato D, Iiboshi K, Kishimoto M, Mimura M, Kishimoto T. Remote neuropsychological assessment of elderly Japanese population using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: A validation study. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Aug-Sep;26(7-8):482-487. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19845278. Epub 2019 May 8.
- Montero-Odasso M, Almeida QJ, Burhan AM, Camicioli R, Doyon J, Fraser S, Li K, Liu-Ambrose T, Middleton L, Muir-Hunter S, McIlroy W, Morais JA, Pieruccini-Faria F, Shoemaker K, Speechley M, Vasudev A, Zou GY, Berryman N, Lussier M, Vanderhaeghe L, Bherer L. SYNERGIC TRIAL (SYNchronizing Exercises, Remedies in Gait and Cognition) a multi-Centre randomized controlled double blind trial to improve gait and cognition in mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0782-7.
- Kueper JK, Speechley M, Montero-Odasso M. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): Modifications and Responsiveness in Pre-Dementia Populations. A Narrative Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(2):423-444. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170991.
- Solomon A, Mangialasche F, Richard E, Andrieu S, Bennett DA, Breteler M, Fratiglioni L, Hooshmand B, Khachaturian AS, Schneider LS, Skoog I, Kivipelto M. Advances in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. J Intern Med. 2014 Mar;275(3):229-50. doi: 10.1111/joim.12178.
- Richards M, Deary IJ. A life course approach to cognitive reserve: a model for cognitive aging and development? Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):617-22. doi: 10.1002/ana.20637.
- Orgeta V, Mukadam N, Sommerlad A, Livingston G. The Lancet Commission on Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: a call for action. Ir J Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;36(2):85-88. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2018.4.
- Anstey KJ, Peters R, Zheng L, Barnes DE, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Chalmers J, Clare L, Dixon RA, Dodge H, Lautenschlager NT, Middleton LE, Qiu C, Rees G, Shahar S, Yaffe K. Future Directions for Dementia Risk Reduction and Prevention Research: An International Research Network on Dementia Prevention Consensus. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;78(1):3-12. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200674.
- Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Boyle PA, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Neurodegenerative basis of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology. 2010 Sep 21;75(12):1070-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f39adc. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- James BD, Bennett DA. Causes and Patterns of Dementia: An Update in the Era of Redefining Alzheimer's Disease. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:65-84. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043758. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
- Diagnostic And Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders : DSM-IV. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
- Rising the Tide: The Impact of Dementia on Canadian Society. 2012.
- Kivipelto M, Mangialasche F, Snyder HM, Allegri R, Andrieu S, Arai H, Baker L, Belleville S, Brodaty H, Brucki SM, Calandri I, Caramelli P, Chen C, Chertkow H, Chew E, Choi SH, Chowdhary N, Crivelli L, Torre R, Du Y, Dua T, Espeland M, Feldman HH, Hartmanis M, Hartmann T, Heffernan M, Henry CJ, Hong CH, Hakansson K, Iwatsubo T, Jeong JH, Jimenez-Maggiora G, Koo EH, Launer LJ, Lehtisalo J, Lopera F, Martinez-Lage P, Martins R, Middleton L, Molinuevo JL, Montero-Odasso M, Moon SY, Morales-Perez K, Nitrini R, Nygaard HB, Park YK, Peltonen M, Qiu C, Quiroz YT, Raman R, Rao N, Ravindranath V, Rosenberg A, Sakurai T, Salinas RM, Scheltens P, Sevlever G, Soininen H, Sosa AL, Suemoto CK, Tainta-Cuezva M, Velilla L, Wang Y, Whitmer R, Xu X, Bain LJ, Solomon A, Ngandu T, Carrillo MC. World-Wide FINGERS Network: A global approach to risk reduction and prevention of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Jul;16(7):1078-1094. doi: 10.1002/alz.12123. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
- Montero-Odasso M, Ismail Z, Livingston G. One third of dementia cases can be prevented within the next 25 years by tackling risk factors. The case "for" and "against". Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Jul 8;12(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00646-x.
- Alzheimer Society of Canada. Report summary Prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada (2016): a report by the Alzheimer Society of Canada. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Oct;36(10):231-232.
- Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):788-94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X.
- Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。