이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

취약한 심방세동 환자를 위한 동료 멘토 지원 (EMPOWER-AF)

2026년 11월 2일 업데이트: Cecilie Mia Lykke Mielow, University College Copenhagen

취약한 심방세동 환자의 정신적 웰빙 탐구 및 개선 - 동료 멘토 개입의 무작위 대조 시험

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a peer-mentor intervention can improve mental well-being among vulnerable patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF often experience anxiety, uncertainty, and reduced quality of life. These challenges are particularly pronounced among individuals with low socioeconomic position, who may face additional barriers to accessing supportive care.

The main question the study aims to answer is:

Does a 16-week peer-mentor intervention reduce anxiety symptoms among patients with AF compared with usual care?

Researchers will compare peer-mentor support plus usual care with usual care alone.

Participants will:

Complete questionnaires about anxiety, depressive symptoms, quality of life, and self-efficacy at baseline and after 16 weeks.

Be randomized either to receive peer-mentor support for 16 weeks or to receive usual care only.

If allocated to the intervention group, be matched with a trained peer mentor with lived experience of atrial fibrillation who provides emotional support and practical guidance through approximately eight contacts over the 16-week period.

The study will also include follow-up using national health registers and a mixed-methods process evaluation exploring participants' and mentors' experiences with the intervention.

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with significant symptom burden, reduced quality of life, and high levels of psychological distress. Anxiety is particularly prevalent among patients with AF and may worsen symptom perception, increase health-related worry, and negatively affect engagement in self-management and healthcare. Individuals with low socioeconomic position often experience greater disease burden and face additional barriers to accessing supportive care, contributing to social inequalities in cardiovascular health.

Peer support interventions have shown promising effects in other cardiac populations by providing emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical guidance based on lived experience. Such interventions may enhance patients' confidence in managing their condition and navigating everyday life with chronic illness.

The EMPOWER-AF study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-mentor intervention designed to support vulnerable patients with AF. The intervention is grounded in social cognitive theory, particularly the concept of self-efficacy, and is intended to strengthen patients' ability to manage symptoms, cope with uncertainty, and improve mental well-being.

The study is conducted as a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Participants are randomized to either a peer-mentor intervention in addition to usual care or usual care alone. The intervention lasts 16 weeks and involves one-to-one support between a trained peer mentor and a patient with AF. Peer mentors are individuals with lived experience of AF who have achieved stable everyday management of the condition and who are trained to provide emotional support and experiential guidance. Contacts between mentors and mentees may take place via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication depending on participant preferences.

In addition to the randomized trial, the study includes an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation to explore participants' and mentors' experiences, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors influencing engagement with the intervention.

The study seeks to generate evidence on whether peer-based support can improve mental well-being among vulnerable patients with AF and contribute to more equitable and person-centered care for this patient group.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

290

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Low socioeconomic position, primarily defined as educational attainment of vocational education or below
  • Able to understand and speak Danish
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Able to complete study questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Peer-Mentor Support + Usual Care

Participants randomized to this arm receive a 16-week peer-mentor intervention in addition to usual care. Each participant is matched with a trained peer mentor with lived experience of atrial fibrillation who provides emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical guidance. The intervention includes approximately eight contacts over 16 weeks delivered via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication depending on participant preferences. Participants continue to receive usual medical care throughout the study period.

A 16-week peer-mentor program designed to support patients living with atrial fibrillation. Participants are matched with trained peer mentors who have lived experience with atrial fibrillation. Mentors provide emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical non-clinical guidance for managing everyday life with the condition. Contacts between mentors and participants are planned approximately eight times during the intervention period and may take place via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication according to participant preferences. Mentors do not provide medical advice.

간섭 없음: Usual care

Participants randomized to this arm receive usual care according to local clinical practice for atrial fibrillation. No peer-mentor support is provided.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Anxiety symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A)
기간: Baseline and 16 weeks

Anxiety symptoms are assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale (HADS-A). The subscale consists of 7 items assessing symptoms such as tension, worry, and panic, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety symptoms.

Baseline and 16 weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Depressive symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)
기간: Baseline and 16 weeks

Depressive symptoms are assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D). The subscale consists of 7 items assessing mood, interest, and enjoyment, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depressive symptoms.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Atrial fibrillation-specific quality of life measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT)
기간: Baseline and 16 weeks

Quality of life is assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire. The questionnaire includes items assessing symptoms, daily activities, treatment concerns, and satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Items are rated on a 7-point scale, and scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Self-efficacy measured by the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SES6G)
기간: Baseline and 16 weeks

Self-efficacy is assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SES6G), which includes 6 items assessing confidence in managing symptoms, emotional challenges, and daily activities related to chronic illness. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 10, and the total score is calculated as the mean of the items, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines based on redeemed prescriptions
기간: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Use of psychotropic medication is assessed using national prescription register data. This includes antidepressants (ATC code N06A) and benzodiazepines (ATC code N05B). The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one redeemed prescription during follow-up.Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Diagnoses of anxiety and depression based on hospital records
기간: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Diagnoses of anxiety and depression are assessed using national patient register data. Diagnoses include anxiety disorders (ICD-10 code F41*) and depressive disorders (ICD-10 codes F32-F33*). The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one diagnosis during follow-up. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Atrial fibrillation-related hospital contacts
기간: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Hospital contacts related to atrial fibrillation are assessed using national patient register data. Contacts are identified using ICD-10 code I48* and include inpatient admissions and outpatient visits. The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one AF-related hospital contact during follow-up. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Cardiac death and suicide
기간: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Mortality outcomes are assessed using national register data and include cardiac death and suicide during follow-up. The outcome is defined as the occurrence of death during the follow-up period. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

협력자

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Signe S Risom, Senior Researcher, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2026년 5월 26일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 11월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2029년 1월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 3월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 3월 23일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 3월 27일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 11월 2일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 1월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • F-26003029

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .