Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Apoyo de Mentores Pares para Pacientes Vulnerables con Fibrilación Auricular (EMPOWER-AF)

2 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: Cecilie Mia Lykke Mielow, University College Copenhagen

Explorar y Mejorar el Bienestar Mental Entre Pacientes Vulnerables Con Fibrilación Auricular - Un Ensayo Controlado Aleatorizado de una Intervención de Mentoría Entre Pares

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a peer-mentor intervention can improve mental well-being among vulnerable patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF often experience anxiety, uncertainty, and reduced quality of life. These challenges are particularly pronounced among individuals with low socioeconomic position, who may face additional barriers to accessing supportive care.

The main question the study aims to answer is:

Does a 16-week peer-mentor intervention reduce anxiety symptoms among patients with AF compared with usual care?

Researchers will compare peer-mentor support plus usual care with usual care alone.

Participants will:

Complete questionnaires about anxiety, depressive symptoms, quality of life, and self-efficacy at baseline and after 16 weeks.

Be randomized either to receive peer-mentor support for 16 weeks or to receive usual care only.

If allocated to the intervention group, be matched with a trained peer mentor with lived experience of atrial fibrillation who provides emotional support and practical guidance through approximately eight contacts over the 16-week period.

The study will also include follow-up using national health registers and a mixed-methods process evaluation exploring participants' and mentors' experiences with the intervention.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with significant symptom burden, reduced quality of life, and high levels of psychological distress. Anxiety is particularly prevalent among patients with AF and may worsen symptom perception, increase health-related worry, and negatively affect engagement in self-management and healthcare. Individuals with low socioeconomic position often experience greater disease burden and face additional barriers to accessing supportive care, contributing to social inequalities in cardiovascular health.

Peer support interventions have shown promising effects in other cardiac populations by providing emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical guidance based on lived experience. Such interventions may enhance patients' confidence in managing their condition and navigating everyday life with chronic illness.

The EMPOWER-AF study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-mentor intervention designed to support vulnerable patients with AF. The intervention is grounded in social cognitive theory, particularly the concept of self-efficacy, and is intended to strengthen patients' ability to manage symptoms, cope with uncertainty, and improve mental well-being.

The study is conducted as a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Participants are randomized to either a peer-mentor intervention in addition to usual care or usual care alone. The intervention lasts 16 weeks and involves one-to-one support between a trained peer mentor and a patient with AF. Peer mentors are individuals with lived experience of AF who have achieved stable everyday management of the condition and who are trained to provide emotional support and experiential guidance. Contacts between mentors and mentees may take place via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication depending on participant preferences.

In addition to the randomized trial, the study includes an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation to explore participants' and mentors' experiences, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors influencing engagement with the intervention.

The study seeks to generate evidence on whether peer-based support can improve mental well-being among vulnerable patients with AF and contribute to more equitable and person-centered care for this patient group.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

290

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Low socioeconomic position, primarily defined as educational attainment of vocational education or below
  • Able to understand and speak Danish
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Able to complete study questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Peer-Mentor Support + Usual Care

Participants randomized to this arm receive a 16-week peer-mentor intervention in addition to usual care. Each participant is matched with a trained peer mentor with lived experience of atrial fibrillation who provides emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical guidance. The intervention includes approximately eight contacts over 16 weeks delivered via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication depending on participant preferences. Participants continue to receive usual medical care throughout the study period.

A 16-week peer-mentor program designed to support patients living with atrial fibrillation. Participants are matched with trained peer mentors who have lived experience with atrial fibrillation. Mentors provide emotional support, normalization of illness experiences, and practical non-clinical guidance for managing everyday life with the condition. Contacts between mentors and participants are planned approximately eight times during the intervention period and may take place via telephone, face-to-face meetings, or digital communication according to participant preferences. Mentors do not provide medical advice.

Sin intervención: Usual care

Participants randomized to this arm receive usual care according to local clinical practice for atrial fibrillation. No peer-mentor support is provided.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Anxiety symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 16 weeks

Anxiety symptoms are assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale (HADS-A). The subscale consists of 7 items assessing symptoms such as tension, worry, and panic, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety symptoms.

Baseline and 16 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Depressive symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 16 weeks

Depressive symptoms are assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D). The subscale consists of 7 items assessing mood, interest, and enjoyment, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depressive symptoms.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Atrial fibrillation-specific quality of life measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 16 weeks

Quality of life is assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire. The questionnaire includes items assessing symptoms, daily activities, treatment concerns, and satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Items are rated on a 7-point scale, and scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Self-efficacy measured by the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SES6G)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 16 weeks

Self-efficacy is assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SES6G), which includes 6 items assessing confidence in managing symptoms, emotional challenges, and daily activities related to chronic illness. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to 10, and the total score is calculated as the mean of the items, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

Baseline and 16 weeks
Use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines based on redeemed prescriptions
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Use of psychotropic medication is assessed using national prescription register data. This includes antidepressants (ATC code N06A) and benzodiazepines (ATC code N05B). The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one redeemed prescription during follow-up.Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Diagnoses of anxiety and depression based on hospital records
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Diagnoses of anxiety and depression are assessed using national patient register data. Diagnoses include anxiety disorders (ICD-10 code F41*) and depressive disorders (ICD-10 codes F32-F33*). The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one diagnosis during follow-up. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Atrial fibrillation-related hospital contacts
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Hospital contacts related to atrial fibrillation are assessed using national patient register data. Contacts are identified using ICD-10 code I48* and include inpatient admissions and outpatient visits. The outcome is defined as the occurrence of at least one AF-related hospital contact during follow-up. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Cardiac death and suicide
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Mortality outcomes are assessed using national register data and include cardiac death and suicide during follow-up. The outcome is defined as the occurrence of death during the follow-up period. Outcome assessments are conducted at 24 weeks and 1 year after completion of the 16-week intervention.

From randomization to 24 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Signe S Risom, Senior Researcher, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

26 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

17 de marzo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de marzo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

27 de marzo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • F-26003029

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .