- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT03156244
Using PROMIS as Part of Routine Clinical Care for Racially Diverse Prostate and Bladder Cancer Patients
LCCC 1636: Using PROMIS as Part of Routine Clinical Care for Racially Diverse Prostate and Bladder Cancer Patients
연구 개요
상세 설명
Cancer treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are often linked to acute and late side effects. Historically, these effects were assessed by physicians and scored using standardized scales such as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Thorough and accurate assessment of symptoms facilitates timely and patient-centered symptom management.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that PROs more accurately capture patient symptoms than physician assessment. In a prospective trial, Falchook et al. investigated patient vs. physician report of symptoms in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (N=44). Patients and physicians separately completed weekly symptom assessments during treatment and once during follow-up. Patients tended to report more severe symptoms than physicians. For example, in week six, physicians rated 86% of patients' fatigue as non-existent or mild while 86% of patients rated their own fatigue as moderate to very severe. In a larger study conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center of 163 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, Basch et al. similarly examined patient vs. physician report of symptoms over one year. Compared to patients, physicians reported less severe and lower rates of fatigue, nausea, and pain and higher functional status.
Findings from these prior studies are consistent with evidence from a recent systematic review, which concluded that PRO data were essential for the evaluation of symptoms in cancer survivors. Many researchers have hypothesized the reasons behind this discrepancy in physician/patient ratings of symptoms, including poor communication, inadequate physician time spent per patient, and patients' underreporting of symptoms to physicians. Thus, incorporation of PRO data into routine clinical care can facilitate better detection and management of cancer and treatment-related effects.
Therefore, the goal of this pilot study is to move PRO data collection from a purely research exercise into using this as a tool to improve care for cancer patients. This pilot study will assess the feasibility of collecting PRO data as part of clinical care, and assess its "value" from the patient and physician perspectives. The investigators will recruit 80 patients with prostate or bladder cancers from the UNC Genitourinary Oncology clinics (including Urology and Radiation Oncology). PRO data that is most relevant to this patient population will be collected, including: gastrointestinal, urinary, sexual function, anxiety/depression, and sleep.
Further, given longstanding racial disparities in symptom experiences (e.g., symptom assessment, severity, frequency) among cancer patients and limited evidence of effective strategies for mitigating such inequities, this pilot study will also examine Black-White differences in terms of the feasibility and perceived value of sharing of patient-reported data to improve communication and decision-making.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 미국, 27599
- Becky Green
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Non-Hispanic Black and White patients with a known pathologic diagnosis of prostate or bladder cancer and intent to undergo treatment.
- Signed, IRB approved written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Initiation of cancer-directed treatment
- Race/ethnicity other than Non-Hispanic Black or Non-Hispanic White
- Inability to read and speak English
- Inability to comply with study for any other reason than language
- Dementia, altered mental status, or any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
---|
Caucasian
This cohort will consist of 40 white patients who are receiving either radiation or surgery for treatment of their prostate or bladder cancer.
|
African American
This cohort will consist of 40 African American patients who are receiving either radiation or surgery for treatment of their prostate or bladder cancer.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
---|---|---|
Feasibility of PRO assessments in a clinical setting
기간: 90 days post treatment
|
The feasibility of incorporating PRO assessments into the clinical setting for 80 Black and White patients undergoing treatment for bladder and prostate cancer.
Feasibility is defined as at least 70% of study participants completing all three PRO assessments.
|
90 days post treatment
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
---|---|---|
Feasibility of enrollment
기간: baseline
|
The feasibility of enrolling bladder and prostate cancer patients into PRO assessment for clinical care.
Feasibility of enrollment is defined as at least 37.56% of eligible patients who are approached about the study agree to enroll.
|
baseline
|
Preferred mode of questionnaire completion
기간: baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
The proportion of study participants who chose web vs. interactive voice response (IVR) as the preferred mode for PRO data collection.
It is hypothesized 50% of patients will chose the web.
|
baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
Feasibility by cohort
기간: baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
The rates of the feasibility of PRO assessment, the feasibility of enrollment, and preferred mode of PRO assessment in Black vs. White patients.
|
baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
Perceived value
기간: baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
Patterns and Black vs. White differences in the perceived value of PRO assessments from the patient's perspective using semi-structured interviews.
|
baseline through 90 days post treatment
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Ronald Chen, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
전립선암에 대한 임상 시험
-
Georgetown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); American Cancer Society, Inc.; Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer...완전한
-
University of UtahNational Cancer Institute (NCI)모병피로 | 좌식 생활 | 전이성 전립선암 | IV기 전립선암 AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) v8 | IVA기 전립선암 AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) v8 | IVB기 전립선암 AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) v8미국
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.완전한신경내분비성 전립선암 | 소세포 전립선암 | Prostate Adenocarcinoma Plus > 신경내분비 표지자에 대한 50% 면역조직화학적 염색미국
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center아직 모집하지 않음전립선암 | IVB기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Rashmi Verma, MDNational Cancer Institute (NCI)모병거세저항성 전립선암 | 전이성 전립선 선암종 | IVB기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center빼는전립선 선암종 | 2기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIC기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIA기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIB기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | 1기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiraDX모집하지 않고 적극적으로전립선 선암종 | 2기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIC기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIA기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIB기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | 1기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center종료됨거세저항성 전립선암 | 전이성 전립선암 | IVA기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IVB기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IV기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterProgenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.종료됨2기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIIA기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIIB기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIC기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | 3기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIIC기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIA기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | IIB기 전립선암 AJCC v8 | 1기 전립선암 American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) v8미국
-
Assiut University아직 모집하지 않음South Egypt Cancer Institute(SECI)에서 소아 악성종양 환자에 대한 KDIGO 기준을 사용하여 AKI의 누적 발병률을 확인하기 위해