Deliver-EE: 식사 배달의 효과 평가
Deliver-EE: 실용, 양군, 무작위 비교 유효성 시험을 통해 집에만 있는 노인이 지역사회에 남아 있을 수 있는 능력에 대한 식사 배달의 효과 평가
This study will randomly assign 2,300 older adults on waiting lists at fourteen Meals on Wheels programs in Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Tennessee, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, and California into two groups who will receive: (a) daily delivery of meals, five days a week or (b) a shipment of 10 frozen meals, every two weeks. Researchers will examine participants' Medicare claims to understand if differences in healthcare utilization occur between the two groups within six months after they start receiving meals. Researchers will also ask participants questions prior to receiving meals, and again at three months, to understand how meals impact their ability to obtain food, their feelings of loneliness, and their overall quality of life. The primary study outcome will be the ratio of days spent in institutional settings (i.e., hospital, nursing home) in the six months after participants begin receiving meals. The secondary outcomes include the ratio of days spent in institutional settings in the three months after participants begin receiving meals, food insecurity, subjective isolation/loneliness, and health-related quality of life. The team will also examine differences in dietary intake between the two groups as an exploratory outcome.
연구 개요
상세 설명
Background and Significance: Food insecurity among older adults is a critical public health issue with implications for families, the healthcare system, and society. In 2017, an estimated 5.5 million older adults (7.7%) in the United States were food insecure. Among older adults, food insecurity is associated with poor health status and outcomes and accounts for an estimated $130 billion annually in medical expenses. As a result, healthcare entities (e.g., payers, integrated systems, providers) are increasingly interested in addressing food insecurity, among other social risk factors, through non-medical services such as home-delivered meals to older patients and enrollees. Home-delivered meals, long provided through a network of community-based organizations funded through the Older Americans Act, state dollars, and charitable contributions, promote food security, socialization, and independence among older adults. While meals have traditionally been provided daily to clients' homes by a volunteer or paid driver, mailed frozen meals have emerged in recent years as a lower cost alternative. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving patients' quality of life, as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of patients' preferences for how meals are delivered to them.
Study Aims: The long-term goal of this research is to generate evidence to guide patient, family, meal programs, and healthcare entities' decision-making about which mode of meal delivery is best for promoting important, patient-centered outcomes. This will be accomplished through three specific aims: 1) To evaluate the effectiveness of receiving daily-delivered meals with a safety check and socialization versus frozen, drop-shipped meals on food insecure, homebound older adults' ability to remain in the community; 2) To understand food insecure, homebound older adults' preferences for mode of meal delivery and the effect of receiving a meal that is concordant with their preference on their ability to remain in the community; and 3) To measure and quantify secondary outcomes prioritized by stakeholders related to these different modes of meal delivery.
Study Description: This is a two-arm pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that will compare participants' health outcomes between two conventional approaches for delivering meals to food insecure, homebound older adults at fourteen diverse Meals on Wheels America member programs in Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Tennessee, Texas, California, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The comparators are the two main modes of meal delivery used in everyday practice: daily-delivered meals and drop-shipped, frozen meals. A total of 2300 food insecure, homebound older adults (ages 66+) on waiting lists at these programs will be enrolled in the study; 1150 older adults will receive meals delivered five days per week, with socialization and a wellness check by a volunteer or paid driver, and 1150 will receive a box of 10 frozen meals that will be mailed to participants every two weeks. The primary outcome will be the ratio of days that a participant is in an institutional setting (i.e., hospital, nursing home) in the six months following the start of meal delivery and will be derived from data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; secondary outcomes include the ratio of days in institutional settings in the three months following the start of meal delivery, food insecurity, loneliness, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be derived from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' data and surveys with participants. Self-reported dietary intake will be included as an exploratory outcome. To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, the investigators will test for interactions between the two types of meals and participants' preferences for meals, as well as clients' living arrangements. This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options in partnership with a variety of stakeholders. The knowledge generated from this research will be of tremendous value to healthcare payers, health systems, providers, community-based organizations, patients, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets older, homebound, and food insecure patients' needs and promotes community independence
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, 미국, 92110
- Meals on Wheels San Diego County
-
-
Florida
-
Clearwater, Florida, 미국, 33762
- Neighborly Care Network
-
Jacksonville, Florida, 미국, 32210
- Aging True
-
-
Illinois
-
Evanston, Illinois, 미국, 60201
- Meals on Wheels Northeastern Illinois
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, 미국, 21224
- Meals on Wheels of Central Maryland
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, 미국, 27703
- Meals On Wheels Durham
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, 미국, 27408
- Senior Resources of Guilford
-
-
South Carolina
-
Anderson, South Carolina, 미국, 29624
- Meals On Wheels - Anderson
-
Columbia, South Carolina, 미국, 29205
- Senior Resources Inc
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, 미국, 38126
- Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association (MIFA)
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, 미국, 75247
- Visiting Nurse Association of Texas
-
Houston, Texas, 미국, 77090
- Northwest Assistance Ministries
-
Mission, Texas, 미국, 78572
- Amigos Del Valle, Inc
-
San Antonio, Texas, 미국, 78229
- Meals on Wheels San Antonio
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 66+
- On program waiting list
- Must reside in program's daily service area
- Must be able to eat a general diet with no dietary restrictions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary language is not English or Spanish
- Has end stage renal disease/requires specialized renal diet
- Unable to participate in a phone survey/interview (e.g., difficulty hearing, lack of comprehension of study purpose, does not have working phone)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 지지 요법
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Daily home delivered meals
A lunch-time meal delivered to participants' homes five days per week with wellness check and socialization. |
In-home delivery with opportunity for driver observation and interaction Prepared meals compliant with Older Americans Act nutrition programs guidelines |
|
실험적: Frozen, Drop-shipped Meals
Ten frozen meals that are mailed to participants every two weeks. |
Prepared meals compliant with Older Americans Act nutrition programs guidelines |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
6-Month Ratio of Days in Institutional Settings
기간: 6 months
|
Ratio between the number of days that are spent in an institutional setting (i.e., acute care hospital, psychiatric hospital, long-term care hospital, nursing home, or skilled nursing facility) and the number of days alive in the six months following receipt of meals |
6 months
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Ratio of Days in Institutional Settings
기간: 3 months
|
Defined similarly to the primary outcome, but assesses the immediate (3-month) impact of meals on days spent in institutional settings |
3 months
|
|
Food Insecurity
기간: 3 months
|
U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form; Minimum value (0) indicates high food insecurity; Maximum value (6) indicates very low food insecurity |
3 months
|
|
Subjective Isolation/Loneliness
기간: 3 months
|
University of California, Los Angeles 3-Item Loneliness Scale; Minimum value (3) indicates low feelings of loneliness; Maximum value (9) indicates high feelings of loneliness |
3 months
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
기간: 3 months
|
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Health-Related Quality of Life 4-question core modules, called the "Healthy Days Measures"; The unhealthy days index is calculated by summing the number of physically and mentally unhealthy days, capped at 30 total days. |
3 months
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
스폰서
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Kali S. Thomas, PhD, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing
- 연구 책임자: Kimberly P. Bernard, PhD, Brown University School of Public Health
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Thomas KS, Bernard KP, Clark M, Dionne L, Fisher A, Gadbois E, Harrison J, Juckett L, Locher J, Risica P, Sequeira T, Theilheimer L, Gutman R. Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial. Trials. 2024 Nov 22;25(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3.
- Juckett LA, Bernard KP, Clark MA, Gadbois EA, Wright B, Thomas KS. Core functions and forms in home-delivered meal programs: a stakeholder-driven approach to identifying essential practices. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 14;6(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00728-7.
- Juckett LA, Bernard KP, Thomas KS. Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies. Trials. 2023 Nov 17;24(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 2022003287
- IHS-2020C3-21201 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .