Bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność tPBM w leczeniu padaczki w autyzmie (tPBM)
Bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność przezczaszkowej fotobiomodulacji (tPBM) u osób z zaburzeniami ze spektrum autyzmu i aktywnością padaczkową
For this study, the proposed intervention will be noninvasively delivered near infra-red (NIR) light - transcranial Photobiomodulation (tPBM) - to the brains of autistic children with abnormal EEGs with epileptiform discharges or with epilepsy. This will occur, twice a week, for 10 weeks. The NIR light is delivered to specific brain areas by Cognilum, a wearable device developed by Jelikalite. The expected outcome is improved focus, improved eye contact, improved speech, improved behavior, and gains in functional skills. Cognilum may impact the clinical practice of treating autism. At the beginning, at five weeks, and at the end of study, the clinician will complete the CARS-2, SRS, CGI, and a caregiver interview; additionally, questionnaires will be administered to caregivers during one of the 1-hour weekly treatment sessions.
Przegląd badań
Status
Warunki
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)
Faza
- Faza 2
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, Stany Zjednoczone, 85050
- Rossignol Medical Center
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Autism Spectrum Disorder (diagnosed as Autistic Disorder on the ADOS-2 or the ADI-R).
- Between 4 and 12 years of age, at baseline.
- Autism severity of moderate or higher (≥4) under the 7-item clinical global impression-severity scale. Moderate level of autism severity (4) is defined by the diagnosis of ASD with language impairment.
- Ability to maintain all ongoing complementary, dietary, traditional, and behavioral treatments constant for the study period.
- Unchanged complementary, dietary, traditional, and behavioral treatments for two months prior to study entry
- Ability to tolerate procedures, as determined at the discretion of the investigator.
- At least one 24hr EEG with data in EDF format that is accessible to investigators.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Significant self-abusive or violent behavior or evidence of suicidal ideation, plan or behavior
-
Severely affected children as defined by CGI-Severity Standard Score = 7 (Extremely Ill)
-
Severe prematurity (<34 weeks gestation) as determined by medical history
-
Current uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease since GERD can cause movements that appear like seizures
-
Genetic syndromes
-
Congenital brain malformations
-
Any medical condition that the PI determines could jeopardize the safety of the study subject or compromise the integrity of the data.
-
Failure to thrive or Body Mass Index < 5%ile or <5%ile for weight (male <11.2kg; female <10.8kg by CDC 2000 growth charts) at the time of the study.
-
Concurrent treatment with drug that would significantly interact with treatment.
- • Stimulants
- • Anti-Psychotics
- • Antihistamines
-
Excessive Hair that the caregivers are unwilling or unable to shave or braid.
-
Inability to tolerate the required dosage of tPBM treatment due to sensory issues.
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Leczenie
- Przydział: Nie dotyczy
- Model interwencyjny: Zadanie dla jednej grupy
- Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: Near infra-red (NIR) light - transcranial Photobiomodulation (tPBM) - to the brain of autistic child
This is a prospective, open level study comparing 15 individuals with active seizures and 15 individuals with EEG abnormalities before and after, near infra-red (NIR) light - transcranial Photobiomodulation (tPBM) will be the active arm |
The proposed intervention will be noninvasively delivered near infra-red (NIR) light - transcranial Photobiomodulation (tPBM) - to the brains of autistic children. The NIR light is delivered to specific brain areas by Cognilum, a wearable device developed by Jelikalite. The expected outcome is improved focus, improved eye contact, improved speech, improved behavior, and gains in functional skills. |
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Childhood Autism Rating Scores (CARS)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Week 5, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
The CARS is a measure of autism severity completed by a clinician. Lower Score is Better. Scores range from 15 to 60. |
Baseline, Week 5, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
EEG Delta Power
Ramy czasowe: Before Treatment and EEG following treatment (within 6 months)
|
Delta power is a measures of the amount of brain activity in the delta frequency as measured by overnight EEG |
Before Treatment and EEG following treatment (within 6 months)
|
Inne miary wyników
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Seizure Frequency
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
Seizure log will record the seizure severity and frequency |
Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
The SRS is a caregiver report of autism symptoms Lower Score is Better, Scores range from 30 to 90 (T-scores) |
Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Improvement
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
The CGI measures the overall disease change. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
NIH Toolbox
Ramy czasowe: Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
The NIH ToolBox is a set of short assessments for neurodevelopmental assessments. Direction of score depends on individual subtest. |
Baseline, Week 11 and Week 15 (One Month Follow-Up)
|
|
OACIS Social Interaction
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specific for Social Interactions: It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Aberrant Behaviors
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Aberrant Behaviors. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Repetitive Behaviors
Ramy czasowe: Week 11 Assessment
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Repetitive Behaviors. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11 Assessment
|
|
OACIS Verbal Communication
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Verbal communication. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Nonverbal Communication
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Nonverbal communication. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Hyperactivity
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Hyperactivity. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Anxiety
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Anxiety. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Sensory Sensitivity
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specifically for Sensory Sensitivity. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Restricted Behavior
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
|
OACIS Autism Symptoms
Ramy czasowe: Week 11
|
CGI Improvement Type Scale Specific for Autism symptoms. It is completed by a clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7. Lower score is better. Scores 1 to 3 represent improvement with 1 representing marked improvement, 2 moderate improvement, 3 mild improvement. Score 4 represents no change. Scores 5 to 7 represent worsening with 5 mildly worse, 6 moderately worse and 7 marked worse. |
Week 11
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Sponsor
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Richard E Frye, M.D., Ph.D, Rossignol Medical Center, Phoenix AZ
Publikacje i pomocne linki
Publikacje ogólne
- Lampl Y, Zivin JA, Fisher M, Lew R, Welin L, Dahlof B, Borenstein P, Andersson B, Perez J, Caparo C, Ilic S, Oron U. Infrared laser therapy for ischemic stroke: a new treatment strategy: results of the NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-1 (NEST-1). Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1843-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.478230. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
- Schiffer F, Johnston AL, Ravichandran C, Polcari A, Teicher MH, Webb RH, Hamblin MR. Psychological benefits 2 and 4 weeks after a single treatment with near infrared light to the forehead: a pilot study of 10 patients with major depression and anxiety. Behav Brain Funct. 2009 Dec 8;5:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-46.
- Johnstone DM, Moro C, Stone J, Benabid AL, Mitrofanis J. Turning On Lights to Stop Neurodegeneration: The Potential of Near Infrared Light Therapy in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurosci. 2016 Jan 11;9:500. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00500. eCollection 2015.
- Khuman J, Zhang J, Park J, Carroll JD, Donahue C, Whalen MJ. Low-level laser light therapy improves cognitive deficits and inhibits microglial activation after controlled cortical impact in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 20;29(2):408-17. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1745. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
- Leisman G, Machado C, Machado Y, Chinchilla-Acosta M. Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1116:111-130. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_234.
- Cassano P, Petrie SR, Mischoulon D, Cusin C, Katnani H, Yeung A, De Taboada L, Archibald A, Bui E, Baer L, Chang T, Chen J, Pedrelli P, Fisher L, Farabaugh A, Hamblin MR, Alpert JE, Fava M, Iosifescu DV. Transcranial Photobiomodulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. The ELATED-2 Pilot Trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Dec;36(12):634-646. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4490. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
- Wong-Riley MT, Liang HL, Eells JT, Chance B, Henry MM, Buchmann E, Kane M, Whelan HT. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c oxidase. J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 11;280(6):4761-71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409650200. Epub 2004 Nov 22.
- Eells JT, Henry MM, Summerfelt P, Wong-Riley MT, Buchmann EV, Kane M, Whelan NT, Whelan HT. Therapeutic photobiomodulation for methanol-induced retinal toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3439-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0534746100. Epub 2003 Mar 7.
- De Taboada L, Yu J, El-Amouri S, Gattoni-Celli S, Richieri S, McCarthy T, Streeter J, Kindy MS. Transcranial laser therapy attenuates amyloid-beta peptide neuropathology in amyloid-beta protein precursor transgenic mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(3):521-35. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100894.
- Purushothuman S, Johnstone DM, Nandasena C, Mitrofanis J, Stone J. Photobiomodulation with near infrared light mitigates Alzheimer's disease-related pathology in cerebral cortex - evidence from two transgenic mouse models. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Jan 3;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/alzrt232. eCollection 2014.
- Grillo SL, Duggett NA, Ennaceur A, Chazot PL. Non-invasive infra-red therapy (1072 nm) reduces beta-amyloid protein levels in the brain of an Alzheimer's disease mouse model, TASTPM. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013 Jun 5;123:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
- Barrett DW, Gonzalez-Lima F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans. Neuroscience. 2013 Jan 29;230:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
- Darlot F, Moro C, El Massri N, Chabrol C, Johnstone DM, Reinhart F, Agay D, Torres N, Bekha D, Auboiroux V, Costecalde T, Peoples CL, Anastascio HD, Shaw VE, Stone J, Mitrofanis J, Benabid AL. Near-infrared light is neuroprotective in a monkey model of Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2016 Jan;79(1):59-75. doi: 10.1002/ana.24542. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
- de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation or Low-Level Light Therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):7000417. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201.
- Naeser MA, Zafonte R, Krengel MH, Martin PI, Frazier J, Hamblin MR, Knight JA, Meehan WP 3rd, Baker EH. Significant improvements in cognitive performance post-transcranial, red/near-infrared light-emitting diode treatments in chronic, mild traumatic brain injury: open-protocol study. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jun 1;31(11):1008-17. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3244. Epub 2014 May 8.
- Xuan W, Vatansever F, Huang L, Hamblin MR. Transcranial low-level laser therapy enhances learning, memory, and neuroprogenitor cells after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19(10):108003. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.108003.
- Xuan W, Agrawal T, Huang L, Gupta GK, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser therapy for traumatic brain injury in mice increases brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and synaptogenesis. J Biophotonics. 2015 Jun;8(6):502-11. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201400069. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
- Blanco NJ, Maddox WT, Gonzalez-Lima F. Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation. J Neuropsychol. 2017 Mar;11(1):14-25. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12074. Epub 2015 May 28.
- Dmochowski GM, Shereen AD, Berisha D, Dmochowski JP. Near-Infrared Light Increases Functional Connectivity with a Non-thermal Mechanism. Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Mar 19;1(1):tgaa004. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa004. eCollection 2020.
- Wan S, Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Analytical modeling for the optical properties of the skin with in vitro and in vivo applications. Photochem Photobiol. 1981 Oct;34(4):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1981.tb09391.x.
- undefined
- Desmet KD, Paz DA, Corry JJ, Eells JT, Wong-Riley MT, Henry MM, Buchmann EV, Connelly MP, Dovi JV, Liang HL, Henshel DS, Yeager RL, Millsap DS, Lim J, Gould LJ, Das R, Jett M, Hodgson BD, Margolis D, Whelan HT. Clinical and experimental applications of NIR-LED photobiomodulation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Apr;24(2):121-8. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.121.
- Giulivi C, Zhang YF, Omanska-Klusek A, Ross-Inta C, Wong S, Hertz-Picciotto I, Tassone F, Pessah IN. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism. JAMA. 2010 Dec 1;304(21):2389-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1706.
- Hipskind SG, Grover FL Jr, Fort TR, Helffenstein D, Burke TJ, Quint SA, Bussiere G, Stone M, Hurtado T. Pulsed Transcranial Red/Near-Infrared Light Therapy Using Light-Emitting Diodes Improves Cerebral Blood Flow and Cognitive Function in Veterans with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Series. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov 28. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4489. Online ahead of print.
- Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Afanasyeva NI. Cellular effects of low power laser therapy can be mediated by nitric oxide. Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Apr;36(4):307-14. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20148.
- Maiello M, Losiewicz OM, Bui E, Spera V, Hamblin MR, Marques L, Cassano P. Transcranial Photobiomodulation with Near-Infrared Light for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 Oct;37(10):644-650. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4677.
- Naeser MA, Martin PI, Ho MD, Krengel MH, Bogdanova Y, Knight JA, Yee MK, Zafonte R, Frazier J, Hamblin MR, Koo BB. Transcranial, Red/Near-Infrared Light-Emitting Diode Therapy to Improve Cognition in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016 Dec;34(12):610-626. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.4037.
- Naeser MA, Ho MD, Martin PI, Hamblin MR, Koo BB. Increased Functional Connectivity Within Intrinsic Neural Networks in Chronic Stroke Following Treatment with Red/Near-Infrared Transcranial Photobiomodulation: Case Series with Improved Naming in Aphasia. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Feb;38(2):115-131. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4630. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
- Ortiz-Mantilla S, Cantiani C, Shafer VL, Benasich AA. Minimally-verbal children with autism show deficits in theta and gamma oscillations during processing of semantically-related visual information. Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 25;9(1):5072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41511-8.
- Reinhart F, Massri NE, Torres N, Chabrol C, Molet J, Johnstone DM, Stone J, Benabid AL, Mitrofanis J, Moro C. The behavioural and neuroprotective outcomes when 670nm and 810nm near infrared light are applied together in MPTP-treated mice. Neurosci Res. 2017 Apr;117:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
- Salgado AS, Zangaro RA, Parreira RB, Kerppers II. The effects of transcranial LED therapy (TCLT) on cerebral blood flow in the elderly women. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1669-2. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
- Zivin JA, Sehra R, Shoshoo A, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Dahlof B, Kasner SE, Howard G, Shuaib A, Streeter J, Richieri SP, Hacke W; NEST-3 investigators. NeuroThera(R) Efficacy and Safety Trial-3 (NEST-3): a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, pivotal study to assess the safety and efficacy of transcranial laser therapy with the NeuroThera(R) Laser System for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within 24 h of stroke onset. Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):950-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00896.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
- Zomorrodi R, Loheswaran G, Pushparaj A, Lim L. Pulsed Near Infrared Transcranial and Intranasal Photobiomodulation Significantly Modulates Neural Oscillations: a pilot exploratory study. Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 19;9(1):6309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42693-x.
- Tian F, Hase SN, Gonzalez-Lima F, Liu H. Transcranial laser stimulation improves human cerebral oxygenation. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):343-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22471. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
- Saltmarche AE, Naeser MA, Ho KF, Hamblin MR, Lim L. Significant Improvement in Cognition in Mild to Moderately Severe Dementia Cases Treated with Transcranial Plus Intranasal Photobiomodulation: Case Series Report. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Aug;35(8):432-441. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4227. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
- Naeser MA, Saltmarche A, Krengel MH, Hamblin MR, Knight JA. Improved cognitive function after transcranial, light-emitting diode treatments in chronic, traumatic brain injury: two case reports. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 May;29(5):351-8. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2814. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
- Morries LD, Cassano P, Henderson TA. Treatments for traumatic brain injury with emphasis on transcranial near-infrared laser phototherapy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Aug 20;11:2159-75. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S65809. eCollection 2015.
- Mester E, Spiry T, Szende B, Tota JG. Effect of laser rays on wound healing. Am J Surg. 1971 Oct;122(4):532-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90482-x. No abstract available.
- Ferraresi C, Parizotto NA, Pires de Sousa MV, Kaippert B, Huang YY, Koiso T, Bagnato VS, Hamblin MR. Light-emitting diode therapy in exercise-trained mice increases muscle performance, cytochrome c oxidase activity, ATP and cell proliferation [J. Biophotonics 8, No. 9, 740-754 (2015)]. J Biophotonics. 2016 Sep;9(9):976. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201680087. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
- Blanco NJ, Saucedo CL, Gonzalez-Lima F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation improves rule-based, but not information-integration, category learning in humans. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Mar;139:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
- Ayuk SM, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Effect of 660 nm visible red light on cell proliferation and viability in diabetic models in vitro under stressed conditions. Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Jul;33(5):1085-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2432-2. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
- Ando T, Xuan W, Xu T, Dai T, Sharma SK, Kharkwal GB, Huang YY, Wu Q, Whalen MJ, Sato S, Obara M, Hamblin MR. Comparison of therapeutic effects between pulsed and continuous wave 810-nm wavelength laser irradiation for traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026212. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
- Tedford CE, DeLapp S, Jacques S, Anders J. Quantitative analysis of transcranial and intraparenchymal light penetration in human cadaver brain tissue. Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):312-22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22343. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)
Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- tPBM Study
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
produkt wyprodukowany i wyeksportowany z USA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .