Language Error Type Evaluation in Developmental Delay Preschool Children by PLS-C
Purpose:
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
Methods:
This is a retrospective chart study enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal. Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded. We recorded correct percentage in pragmatics, syntax, and semantics in different age group separately in auditory comprehension, language expression as well as overall performance. All wrong questions answered in PLS-C were recorded. We used SAS 9.4 (Anova, t-test) to analyze the results in age differences, gender differences, and language components differences
Results:
In overall performance, expression, and comprehension, there was no difference between boy and girl by t-test in all ages. By one-way Anova Bonferroni t test, age 5 was better than age 4 and age 3 significantly in pragmatics, syntax and semantics (p<0.005).
We further separated into groups of 5YR boy, 5YR girl, 4YR boy, 4YR girl, and 3YR boy.
In overall performance, by Duncan's multiple analysis, only 5 YR boy had significant better performance than 4 YR girl and 3 YR boy in pragmatics. In age 5, boys had better performance in pragmatics than girls (p<0.05). In age 4, no differences are showed between boy and girl.
In comprehension, in age 5, boys have better performance in pragmatics than girls(p<0.05).
In expression, there was no difference between boys and girls. Pragmatics was better than syntax (p=0.0202<o.o5) in age 5.
Conclusion:
We found age had more effect than gender in language delay children. Age 5 boys had better performance in pragmatics conflicted with some previous studies and may need more exploration in the future.
Key words:
Development Delay, Preschool aged children, Language Development Delay, Semantics, Syntax, Pragmatics, Language error type
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Purpose:
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
Methods:
This is a retrospective chart study enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal. Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded. We recorded correct percentage in pragmatics, syntax, and semantics in different age group separately in auditory comprehension, language expression as well as overall performance. All wrong questions answered in PLS-C were recorded. We used SAS 9.4 (Anova, t-test) to analyze the results in age differences, gender differences, and language components differences
Results:
In overall performance, expression, and comprehension, there was no difference between boy and girl by t-test in all ages. By one-way Anova Bonferroni t test, age 5 was better than age 4 and age 3 significantly in pragmatics, syntax and semantics (p<0.005).
We further separated into groups of 5YR boy, 5YR girl, 4YR boy, 4YR girl, and 3YR boy.
In overall performance, by Duncan's multiple analysis, only 5 YR boy had significant better performance than 4 YR girl and 3 YR boy in pragmatics. In age 5, boys had better performance in pragmatics than girls (p<0.05). In age 4, no differences are showed between boy and girl.
In comprehension, in age 5, boys have better performance in pragmatics than girls(p<0.05).
In expression, there was no difference between boys and girls. Pragmatics was better than syntax (p=0.0202<o.o5) in age 5.
Conclusion:
We found age had more effect than gender in language delay children. Age 5 boys had better performance in pragmatics conflicted with some previous studies and may need more exploration in the future.
Key words:
Development Delay, Preschool aged children, Language Development Delay, Semantics, Syntax, Pragmatics, Language error type
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Testmetod
Studera befolkning
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter och interventioner
Grupp / Kohort |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
5YR boy
|
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
|
|
5YR girl
|
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
|
|
4YR boy
|
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
|
|
4YR girl
|
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
|
|
3YR boy
|
To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
What's the difference of language error types between boy and girl.
Tidsram: 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec
|
In overall performance, expression, and comprehension, there was no difference between boy and girl by t-test in all ages.
|
2011 Jan to 2014 Dec
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Uppskatta)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- N201508007
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .
Kliniska prövningar på Language Error Type
-
Piazza della Vittoria 14 Studio Medico - Ginecologia...AvslutadKvinnlig könsstympning Typ I Status | Kvinnlig könsstympning Typ II Status | Kvinnlig könsstympning Typ III StatusItalien
-
Arizona State UniversityCatholic Charities Phoenix; Phoenix International Refugee Committee; Refugee... och andra samarbetspartnersAvslutadKvinnlig könsstympning Typ I Status | Kvinnlig könsstympning Typ II Status | Kvinnlig könsstympning Typ III StatusFörenta staterna
-
Hereditary Neuropathy FoundationRekryteringCharcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom, typ IA | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom typ 2A | Charcot-Marie-Tooth | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom, typ IB | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom typ 2 | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom, typ 2C | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom typ 2A2B | Charcot-Marie-Tooth sjukdom... och andra villkorFörenta staterna
-
Hoffmann-La RocheAvslutadTyp 2-diabetes, typ 1-diabetesÖsterrike, Storbritannien
-
University of PretoriaNestlè Nutrition Institute Africa; South African Sugar AssociationAvslutadDiabetes mellitus, typ II [Icke-insulinberoende typ] [NIDDM-typ] OkontrolleradSydafrika
-
SanofiAvslutadTyp 1-diabetes mellitus-typ 2-diabetes mellitusUngern, Ryska Federationen, Tyskland, Polen, Japan, Förenta staterna, Finland
-
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company LimitedOkändTyp 2 diabetes mellitus | Typ 1 diabetes mellitusFörenta staterna
-
Leiden University Medical CenterAndaluz Health ServiceAvslutadDiabetes mellitus | Hälsobeteende | Självförmåga | Typ 2 diabetes mellitus | Typ 1 diabetes mellitusNederländerna, Spanien
-
Cadent TherapeuticsIndragenSpinocerebellär ataxi typ 3 | Spinocerebellär ataxi | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 1 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 2 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 6 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 10 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 7 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 8 | Spinocerebellär ataxi typ 17 | ARCA1 - Autosomal recessiv cerebellär ataxi...Förenta staterna
-
Zhejiang Provincial People's HospitalHar inte rekryterat ännuDiabetes typ 2 | typ 1 diabetesKina