- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT04196374
Återkomst av genomiska resultat och aggregerad penetrans i populationsbaserade kohorter (PopSeq)
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Målen med detta projekt är att: 1) Återföra kliniskt genomförbara genomiska resultat till deltagarna och spåra resultat. Bland levande FHS/JHS-deltagare som har samtyckt till gRoR, kommer vi att kontakta dem där en skadlig handlingsbar variant upptäcks i en av generna som noteras på ACMG:s rekommenderade sekundära resultatlista (uppskattningsvis 2% av deltagarna). 2) Förbättra metoder med hög genomströmning för att identifiera giltig patogen variation. Förfina och tillämpa metoder för screening med hög genomströmning av FHS/JHS-genom på ett sätt som behåller hög känslighet för detektering av skadliga varianter i ~ 3500 gener som är associerade med Mendels sjukdom samtidigt som den falska upptäckten av varianter som inte är patogena/sannolikt patogena minskar. 3) Utforska aggregerad penetrans för Mendelska sjukdomar. Granska fenotypdata från en undergrupp av FHS- och JHS-deltagare och jämför detta med genotypdata.
Data som ska samlas in inkluderar utfall och fenotypisk data om de individer som går med på gRoR och som får reda på att de har en skadlig variant i en av de gener som anges i ACMG. Dessa data kommer att självrapporteras genom undersökningar och tillgängliga medicinska journaler kommer att granskas. Ytterligare fenotypiska data kan samlas in och granskas för andra icke-handlingsbara gener för mendelska sjukdomar för att utforska genomisk penetrans.
Forskningsdeltagare som identifieras med en skadlig variant i en handlingsbar gen kan få direkta hälsofördelar av att lära sig denna information; men att returnera genomiska resultat till friska individer som inte uppvisar en medicinsk indikation kan innebära oväntade skador relaterade till variantriktade ökningar av screening och hantering. Denna studie är inriktad på att utforska fördelarna och eventuella skador relaterade till att returnera genomisk information i populationsbaserade kohorter. Det kommer också att göra det möjligt för oss att bättre förstå penetreringen av dessa varianter i två populationer som inte valts ut för sjukdomsstatus och kommer att tillåta oss att jämföra resultat i en primärt afroamerikansk befolkning jämfört med en kaukasisk befolkning. Att utveckla metoder för att effektivisera variantanalys kommer att bidra till att förbättra laboratorieeffektiviteten och kommer att utveckla området för variantkuration och analys.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Framingham, Massachusetts, Förenta staterna, 01702
- Framingham Heart Study
-
-
Mississippi
-
Jackson, Mississippi, Förenta staterna, 39213
- Jackson Heart Study
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Beskrivning
Inklusionskriterier:
- Levande individer inskrivna i Framingham Heart Study och Jackson Heart Study som har fått sina genom sekvenserade som en del av TOPMed-programmet.
- Vuxna över 18 år
- De som har samtyckt till att få sina DNA-prover använda för forskningsändamål (och de som deltar i gRoR som har samtyckt till att få genomisk information).
Exklusions kriterier:
- Deltagare i Framingham Heart Study eller Jackson Heart Study som inte har fått sina genom sekvenserade som en del av TOPMed
- Deltagare som inte valde genomisk/genetisk forskning
- Deltagare som gjorde/inte samtyckte till att få ett genomiskt resultat (endast för grRoR-delen av denna studie)
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Förebyggande
- Tilldelning: N/A
- Interventionsmodell: Enskild gruppuppgift
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: FHS & JHS deltagare med ett genomgripande fynd
Framingham och Jackson Heart Study-deltagare som har fått sina genom sekvenserade som en del av TOPMed kommer att meddelas om ett handlingsbart genetiskt resultat i en ACMG v2.0-gen identifieras och kommer att erbjudas möjligheten att få sitt forskningsresultat kliniskt bekräftat av studien.
|
Helgenomsekvensering och rapportering av genomförbara genomiska resultat för gener som ingår på ACMGs sekundära resultatlista.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Follow Through With Disclosure
Tidsram: From genetic result notification to 8 months post-disclosure
|
Living JHS/FHS participants sequenced as part of the TOPMed program who were notified about an actionable genetic result that warranted having the research result verified who followed through with having their result confirmed and disclosed to their health care provider.
|
From genetic result notification to 8 months post-disclosure
|
|
Total Costs of Program Implementation
Tidsram: From the initiation of bioinformatics analysis to disclosure of confirmed actionable genetic finding (approximately 6 months).
|
We will determine the costs and associated time demands of implementing gRoR using a microcosting approach in which study staff track the amount of time they spend and the resources they use for each step of the protocol.
Ranges are based on 50% to 200% of point estimates given variability in wages and prices of services.
|
From the initiation of bioinformatics analysis to disclosure of confirmed actionable genetic finding (approximately 6 months).
|
|
Costs of Follow-Up Care
Tidsram: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
For follow-up medical care, we use a gross costing approach where we apply Centers for Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules to participant-reported referrals and tests.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Guideline Compliance
Tidsram: At the time of disclosure of confirmed findings (approximately 3 months after initial results notification)
|
Number of participants with actionable genetic results who, per the judgement of a genetic specialist, had already met clinical criteria for genetic testing based on their personal and family histories of disease.
|
At the time of disclosure of confirmed findings (approximately 3 months after initial results notification)
|
|
New and Modified Diagnoses
Tidsram: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results);1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 1 year to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
We will examine cases to determine the percentage of individuals who report a new or modified diagnosis attributed to results disclosure.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results);1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 1 year to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Self-Rated Health
Tidsram: Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
A single item of self rated health derived from the SF-12v2.
|
Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Number of Participants With Recommendations to Referrals or Services During Clinical Disclosure Sessions
Tidsram: From disclosure to 1 month post-disclosure
|
We reviewed chart notes from results disclosure sessions to determine whether referrals or services were recommended in response to genetic findings.
|
From disclosure to 1 month post-disclosure
|
|
Health Care Utilization
Tidsram: 1 year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Health care utilization in response to results disclosure reported by participants in the one year follow-up survey, including referrals, tests and/or procedures, and changes to medications.
|
1 year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Reported Changes to Health Behaviors
Tidsram: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
A series of standardized yes/no questions that assess whether disclosed genetic information motivated participants to make changes to health behaviors, including diet, exercise, dietary supplements use, alcohol use, stress management, and smoking.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Disclosure-specific Impact
Tidsram: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed the disclosure-specific impact of information on distress and positive emotions using an adapted 12-item version of the FaCTOR, a validated instrument developed for genomic sequencing that is sensitive to responses to high- and low-risk genetic risk results.
Subscales assess negative emotions (range: 3 to 15), positive feelings (reverse-scored, range: 4 to 20), uncertainty (range: 3 to 15), and privacy concerns (range: 2 to 10), with higher scores on each subscale indicating more negative experiences.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Satisfaction With Disclosure
Tidsram: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Surveys assessed how helpful participants felt the results disclosure session was using a novel single question.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Decisional Regret
Tidsram: 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Surveys assessed if participants regretted their decisions to receive their genetic findings using a novel single question.
|
6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results); 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Sharing With Relatives
Tidsram: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed with whether participants shared their genetic information with relatives .
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
Family Testing
Tidsram: 1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
The survey assessed whether participants had relatives that received genetic testing based on disclosure to the participant.
|
1 Year Post-Disclosure Survey (from 12 months to 15 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
|
General Anxiety
Tidsram: Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
We measure general anxiety using a 4-item version of the General Anxiety Disorder Scale, a validated scale that allows investigators to identify individuals with a potential mood disorder.
Scores range from 4 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
|
Post Disclosure Survey (up to 1 month from disclosure of confirmed results); 6 months Post-Disclosure Survey (6-9 months after disclosure of confirmed results)
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Allmänna publikationer
- Wolf SM, Branum R, Koenig BA, Petersen GM, Berry SA, Beskow LM, Daly MB, Fernandez CV, Green RC, LeRoy BS, Lindor NM, O'Rourke PP, Breitkopf CR, Rothstein MA, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
- Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J, Kapur V, Keane MA, Koenig BA, Leroy BS, McFarland EG, Paradise J, Parker LS, Terry SF, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x.
- Vassy JL, Lautenbach DM, McLaughlin HM, Kong SW, Christensen KD, Krier J, Kohane IS, Feuerman LZ, Blumenthal-Barby J, Roberts JS, Lehmann LS, Ho CY, Ubel PA, MacRae CA, Seidman CE, Murray MF, McGuire AL, Rehm HL, Green RC; MedSeq Project. The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials. 2014 Mar 20;15:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-85.
- McLaughlin HM, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Christensen KD, Kohane IS, Krier J, Lane WJ, Lautenbach D, Lebo MS, Machini K, MacRae CA, Azzariti DR, Murray MF, Seidman CE, Vassy JL, Green RC, Rehm HL; MedSeq Project. A systematic approach to the reporting of medically relevant findings from whole genome sequencing. BMC Med Genet. 2014 Dec 14;15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12881-014-0134-1.
- Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Schonman EF, Blout CL, Robinson JO, Krier JB, Diamond PM, Lebo M, Machini K, Azzariti DR, Dukhovny D, Bates DW, MacRae CA, Murray MF, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC; MedSeq Project. The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 27;167(3):159-169. doi: 10.7326/M17-0188. Print 2017 Aug 1.
- Christensen KD, Vassy JL, Phillips KA, Blout CL, Azzariti DR, Lu CY, Robinson JO, Lee K, Douglas MP, Yeh JM, Machini K, Stout NK, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC, Dukhovny D; MedSeq Project. Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial. Genet Med. 2018 Dec;20(12):1544-1553. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.35. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
- Lupo PJ, Robinson JO, Diamond PM, Jamal L, Danysh HE, Blumenthal-Barby J, Lehmann LS, Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Green RC, McGuire AL; MedSeq Project team. Patients' perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project. Per Med. 2016 Jan 1;13(1):13-20. doi: 10.2217/pme.15.45. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
- Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1408914. No abstract available.
- Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, Lawrenz F, Kahn JP, Beskow LM, Cho MK, Christman MF, Green RC, Hall R, Illes J, Keane M, Knoppers BM, Koenig BA, Kohane IS, Leroy B, Maschke KJ, McGeveran W, Ossorio P, Parker LS, Petersen GM, Richardson HS, Scott JA, Terry SF, Wilfond BS, Wolf WA. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):361-84. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.23.
- Burke W, Evans BJ, Jarvik GP. Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):105-11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31393. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group; Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, Puggal M, Beskow LM, Biesecker LG, Bookman E, Burke W, Burchard EG, Church G, Clayton EW, Eckfeldt JH, Fernandez CV, Fisher R, Fullerton SM, Gabriel S, Gachupin F, James C, Jarvik GP, Kittles R, Leib JR, O'Donnell C, O'Rourke PP, Rodriguez LL, Schully SD, Shuldiner AR, Sze RK, Thakuria JV, Wolf SM, Burke GL. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.
- Natarajan P, Gold NB, Bick AG, McLaughlin H, Kraft P, Rehm HL, Peloso GM, Wilson JG, Correa A, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Kathiresan S, Green RC. Aggregate penetrance of genomic variants for actionable disorders in European and African Americans. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 9;8(364):364ra151. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2367.
- Christensen KD, Phillips KA, Green RC, Dukhovny D. Cost Analyses of Genomic Sequencing: Lessons Learned from the MedSeq Project. Value Health. 2018 Sep;21(9):1054-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- Roberts JS, Robinson JO, Diamond PM, Bharadwaj A, Christensen KD, Lee KB, Green RC, McGuire AL; MedSeq Project team. Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.223. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
- Christensen KD, Dukhovny D, Siebert U, Green RC. Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing. J Pers Med. 2015 Dec 10;5(4):470-86. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040470.
- Machini K, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Azzariti DR, Sharma H, Rossetti P, Mahanta L, Hutchinson L, McLaughlin H; MedSeq Project; Green RC, Lebo M, Rehm HL. Analyzing and Reanalyzing the Genome: Findings from the MedSeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
- Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, McGuire AL, Nussbaum RL, O'Daniel JM, Ormond KE, Rehm HL, Watson MS, Williams MS, Biesecker LG; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):565-74. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
- Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, Herman GE, Hufnagel SB, Klein TE, Korf BR, McKelvey KD, Ormond KE, Richards CS, Vlangos CN, Watson M, Martin CL, Miller DT. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Faktisk)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- R01HL143295 (U.S.S. NIH-anslag/kontrakt)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivning
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .