使用综合测序的眼部病原体和转录组研究 (OPTICS)
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
California
-
San Francisco、California、美国、94158
- University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
描述
纳入标准:
- 推测感染性前葡萄膜炎、中间葡萄膜炎、后葡萄膜炎或全葡萄膜炎
- 推测术后眼内炎
- 单边或双边
- 18岁及以上
排除标准:
- MDS 样本不足
- 年龄 < 18 岁
- 怀孕
- 无法同意
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:诊断
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:护理标准
参加试验并随机分配到标准护理 (SOC) 组的患者将接受标准护理测试。
|
SOC 包括任何可用的诊断测试,例如革兰氏染色、培养、PCR,这些被认为是基于临床发现的适当测试。
|
|
实验性的:材料数据表
参加试验并随机分配到 MDS 组的患者将接受标准护理测试和 MDS 测试。
|
MDS 是一种基于 RNA-seq 的眼液或组织测试,用于识别潜在的传染性病原体,包括细菌、真菌、寄生虫以及 DNA 和 RNA 病毒。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement 2-step Decrease in the Level of Inflammation or Decrease to Grade 0; Inflammatory Retinal/Choroidal Lesions Reducing in Size; 20% Improvement of CST on Optical Coherence Tomography, a > 10- Letter Improvement in Visual Acuity,
大体时间:4-week after randomization
|
Dichotomous variable (Y/N) as assessed by a masked evaluator
|
4-week after randomization
|
|
Appropriate Therapy
大体时间:4-week after randomization
|
Dichotomous variable (Y/N) as determined by an independent expert panel
|
4-week after randomization
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider Certainty of Belief
大体时间:4-week after randomization
|
Provider certainty of belief that the patient has an infection (continuous variable from 0 to 100%, 0% signifying uncertain and 100% signifying certain)
|
4-week after randomization
|
|
Patient Quality of Life
大体时间:4-week after randomization
|
As measured by National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (min = 0, max = 100; higher means better vision function)
|
4-week after randomization
|
|
Comparative Sensitivity of the Physician, Conventional Diagnostics, and MDS Using Latent Class Analysis
大体时间:Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization.
|
Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to estimate the sensitivity of three diagnostic approaches: (1) clinical diagnosis by the treating physician at presentation, (2) conventional diagnostics, and (3) MDS. LCA was performed on all randomized participants with infection status, evaluating the diagnostic performance of treating physicians, conventional diagnostics, and MDS. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in Phase l of the OPTICS trial. |
Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization.
|
|
Comparative Specificity of the Physician, Conventional Diagnostics, and MDS Using Latent Class Analysis
大体时间:Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization
|
Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to estimate the specificity of three diagnostic approaches: (1) clinical diagnosis by the treating physician at presentation, (2) conventional diagnostics, and (3) MDS. LCA was performed on all randomized participants with infection status, evaluating the diagnostic performance of treating physicians, conventional diagnostics, and MDS. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in Phase l of the OPTICS trial. |
Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization
|
合作者和调查者
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Thuy Doan, MD, PhD、University of California, San Francisco
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.