Ocular Pathogen and Transcriptome Investigation Using Comprehensive Sequencing (OPTICS)

This is a multi-center randomized controlled evaluator-masked trial designed to compare metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS) versus standard of care testing for improvement of outcomes for intraocular infections. Patients with presumed intraocular infections who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to receive MDS testing results or not to receive MDS testing results. All patients will receive standard-of-care testing to guide management. Enrolled patients will be followed at week 2, week 3-6 (randomization visit), and at 4 weeks after the randomization visit. The proportions of patients who received the appropriate therapy and the proportions of patients with improved outcome will be compared between arms. Patient quality of life, MDS performance, and the provider certainly of belief will be collected.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presumed infectious anterior uveitis, or intermediate uveitis, or posterior uveitis, or panuveitis
  • Presumed post-operative endophthalmitis
  • Unilateral or bilateral
  • 18 years and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient specimen for MDS
  • Age < 18 years of age
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Patients enrolled in the trial and randomized to the standard of care (SOC) arm will undergo standard of care testing.
SOC includes any available diagnostic tests, such as Gram stain, cultures, PCRs, that are considered the appropriate testing based on the clinical findings.
Experimental: MDS
Patients enrolled in the trial and randomized to the MDS arm will undergo standard of care testing and MDS testing.
MDS is an RNA-seq based testing of ocular fluid or tissue to identify potential infectious pathogens including bacteria, fungi, parasites, and DNA and RNA viruses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Improvement 2-step Decrease in the Level of Inflammation or Decrease to Grade 0; Inflammatory Retinal/Choroidal Lesions Reducing in Size; 20% Improvement of CST on Optical Coherence Tomography, a > 10- Letter Improvement in Visual Acuity,
Time Frame: 4-week after randomization
Dichotomous variable (Y/N) as assessed by a masked evaluator
4-week after randomization
Appropriate Therapy
Time Frame: 4-week after randomization
Dichotomous variable (Y/N) as determined by an independent expert panel
4-week after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Provider Certainty of Belief
Time Frame: 4-week after randomization
Provider certainty of belief that the patient has an infection (continuous variable from 0 to 100%, 0% signifying uncertain and 100% signifying certain)
4-week after randomization
Patient Quality of Life
Time Frame: 4-week after randomization
As measured by National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (min = 0, max = 100; higher means better vision function)
4-week after randomization
Comparative Sensitivity of the Physician, Conventional Diagnostics, and MDS Using Latent Class Analysis
Time Frame: Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization.

Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to estimate the sensitivity of three diagnostic approaches: (1) clinical diagnosis by the treating physician at presentation, (2) conventional diagnostics, and (3) MDS.

LCA was performed on all randomized participants with infection status, evaluating the diagnostic performance of treating physicians, conventional diagnostics, and MDS. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in Phase l of the OPTICS trial.

Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization.
Comparative Specificity of the Physician, Conventional Diagnostics, and MDS Using Latent Class Analysis
Time Frame: Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization

Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to estimate the specificity of three diagnostic approaches: (1) clinical diagnosis by the treating physician at presentation, (2) conventional diagnostics, and (3) MDS.

LCA was performed on all randomized participants with infection status, evaluating the diagnostic performance of treating physicians, conventional diagnostics, and MDS. A total of 100 participants were enrolled in Phase l of the OPTICS trial.

Conclusion of study. 4 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thuy Doan, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uveitis

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care (SOC)

3
Subscribe