Techcyte SureView 宫颈细胞学系统临床验证研究
评估 Techcyte Sureview 宫颈细胞学系统及其子系统在巴氏试验评估中的性能的多中心、两臂临床研究
The clinical study is a multi-center, retrospective, blinded, matched-pair, two-arm clinical study in which one test assessment and a control assessment of liquid-based cytology (LBC) pap tests are performed and compared to a reference.
The control method is defined as the assessment of LBC pap tests performed by a cytotechnologist (CT) and/or cytopathologist (CP) using standard laboratory cervical cytology practices (i.e. a manual assessment) and following The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology (TBS). The control method is referred to as the "standard method".
The test method is referred to as the AI-assisted method. The AI-assisted method is defined as the assessment of the same LBC pap test as in the standard method, but with the Techcyte SureView Cervical Cytology System, which has pap tests being scanned on the Pramana SpectralHT Cubiq whole slide scanner, analyzed with the Techcyte Cervical Cytology Algorithm (TCCA) and presented on the Techcyte Viewer, using the Dell U3223QE Monitor for assessment by a CT/CP following the TBS.
In addition, the time spent reviewing the samples with both methods will be measured such that the CT workload limit for AI-assisted assessment can be established.
The LBC pap tests to be assessed in the clinical study must have been prepared with either ThinPrep® Pap Test (Hologic) or BD SurePath™ (Beckton, Dickinson and Company). The study aims to enroll for each preparation method an equal number of samples.
研究概览
地位
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Utah
-
Orem、Utah、美国、84057
- Techcyte
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
Samples collected in the United States
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with Hologic ThinPrep according to the pap test manufacturers Instructions for Use (IFU) using any of Hologic's processors (i.e. ThinPrep2000, ThinPrep 3000, ThinPrep 5000, ThinPrep Genesis). OR Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with BD SurePath according to the pap test manufacturers IFU using any of BD's processors (i.e. BD Totalys MultiProcessor, BD Totalys SlidePrep, BD PrepStain).
- Slide has the original diagnosis available.
- Slides that fit within the required sample size strata using the sample collection procedure.
- Glass slides with QR code, barcodes, or plain text labels.
- Glass slides with coverslips.
- Slides that are 5 years old or less, except where rare specimens require it. Those specimens will have to be reviewed for degradation per the sample collection procedure.
- Only one sample per patient and all are to be collected, processed and scanned.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Broken or cracked slides.
- Slides with air bubbles or scratched, cracked or broken/missing cover slips.
- Slides with markings (e.g., handwritten pen marking) that cannot be removed according to standard laboratory procedures.
- Degraded slides (ex: slides whose stains have lost color or specimens that are not intact).
- Glass slides with cervical cytology specimens prepared with methods other than Hologic ThinPrep or BD SurePath.
- Glass slides with specimens other than cervical cytology specimens.
- Slides from the same patient.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 观测模型：OTHER
- 时间观点：RETROSPECTIVE
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and specificity when comparing pap tests using the Techcyte SureView Cervical Cytology System
大体时间：1 day
|
The primary objective of the study is to show that the assessment of LBC pap tests using the Techcyte SureView Cervical Cytology System, i.e. the AI-assisted method, is non-inferior to current standard practice, i.e., the standard method, at the LSIL+ threshold used for cytologic diagnosis (specimen adequacy and descriptive diagnosis) as defined by The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. |
1 day
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Nayar R, Wilbur DC. (eds), The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes. 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer: 2015.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.