Transfusion Strategies in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery

May 29, 2015 updated by: jill cholette, University of Rochester

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Transfusion Strategies in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cavopulmonary Connection.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best red blood cell(hemoglobin) level for infants and children following surgical repair of particular heart defects. These children often receive red blood cell transfusions after surgery, but what the best hemoglobin level is for them remains unknown.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objective: To compare mean post-operative arterial lactate levels, oxygen utilization, and outcome measures in pediatric patients undergoing cavopulmonary connection managed with two different red blood cell transfusion strategies.

Methods: We propose a prospective, randomized clinical trial of sixty-six pediatric patients with cyanotic, complex congenital cardiac disease undergoing cavopulmonary connection as their operative repair. Thirty-three patients will be randomly assigned to a low Hb strategy of transfusion, in which red cells are transfused if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 9.0 g/dL, and hemoglobin concentrations are maintained about 8.5 g/dL. Thirty-three additional patients will be randomly assigned to the high Hb transfusion strategy, where red cells are transfused if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 13.0 g/dL, and hemoglobin concentrations are maintained about 12.5 g/dL. The primary endpoint will be comparison of mean arterial lactate levels from 8 to 72 hours post-operatively. The secondary endpoints will be oxygen utilization reflected by the arterio-venous oxygen difference (AV-difference) and arterio-cerebral oxygen difference (AC-difference). Measures of oxygen utilization will be derived from arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), and cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) collected at various time points throughout the study. Tertiary outcome measures will be length of mechanical ventilation, length of oxygen use and of vasoactive agent administration, length pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) admission, volume of blood transfused, and mortality. Data from each group will be compared using analysis of variance to assess for the presence of a difference between the two transfusion strategies. If a significant difference between the two groups exists, T-tests will be performed to compare data points between each group to assess for a significant difference.

Hypothesis: A more restrictive (low Hb) strategy of red cell transfusion will be as effective as, and possibly superior to, the historical (high Hb) approach. Allowing a lower Hb concentration will decrease RBC donor exposure and may decrease the known complications of RBC transfusions. We postulate that no significant difference will exist between the two transfusion groups in regards to hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary status (as evidenced by mean lactate levels) and oxygen utilization.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

4 months to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 4 months to 6.99 years of age
  • surgical candidates for cavopulmonary connection
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of known bleeding disorder
  • presence of known coagulopathy
  • age < 4 months
  • age > 7 years
  • non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 1
High Hemoglobin group; goal Hb >13g/dl. 10cc/kg RBCs are transfused for any hemoglobin value under 13g/dl regardless whether clinical indication for transfusion exists.
Other: transfusion strategy
For the High Hb group; transfusions will be given to keep the Hb >13.0 g/dl
Active Comparator: 2
Low Hb transfusion group; goal to not transfuse unless the Hb <9.0 g/dl. 10cc/kg RBCs are transfused only if the Hemoglobin is under 9.0g/dl and clinical indications for transfusion exist.
Other: Low Hb transfusion group
RBCs will not be transfused unless the Hb < 9.0 g/dl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Arterial Lactate Level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Mean arterial lactate for the first 48 hours post-op.
48 hours
Peak Arterial Lactate Level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Peak arterial lactate level for the 48 hour post-op study period.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oxygen Utilization During the 8 Hour to 72 Hours Post-operative Period.
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Oxygen Use
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Vasoactive Agent Administration
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Volume of Blood Transfused
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Mortality Before Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jill M Cholette, MD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 5, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 12408

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings