Transfusion Strategies in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery

May 29, 2015 updated by: jill cholette, University of Rochester

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Transfusion Strategies in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cavopulmonary Connection.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best red blood cell(hemoglobin) level for infants and children following surgical repair of particular heart defects. These children often receive red blood cell transfusions after surgery, but what the best hemoglobin level is for them remains unknown.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To compare mean post-operative arterial lactate levels, oxygen utilization, and outcome measures in pediatric patients undergoing cavopulmonary connection managed with two different red blood cell transfusion strategies.

Methods: We propose a prospective, randomized clinical trial of sixty-six pediatric patients with cyanotic, complex congenital cardiac disease undergoing cavopulmonary connection as their operative repair. Thirty-three patients will be randomly assigned to a low Hb strategy of transfusion, in which red cells are transfused if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 9.0 g/dL, and hemoglobin concentrations are maintained about 8.5 g/dL. Thirty-three additional patients will be randomly assigned to the high Hb transfusion strategy, where red cells are transfused if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 13.0 g/dL, and hemoglobin concentrations are maintained about 12.5 g/dL. The primary endpoint will be comparison of mean arterial lactate levels from 8 to 72 hours post-operatively. The secondary endpoints will be oxygen utilization reflected by the arterio-venous oxygen difference (AV-difference) and arterio-cerebral oxygen difference (AC-difference). Measures of oxygen utilization will be derived from arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), and cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) collected at various time points throughout the study. Tertiary outcome measures will be length of mechanical ventilation, length of oxygen use and of vasoactive agent administration, length pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) admission, volume of blood transfused, and mortality. Data from each group will be compared using analysis of variance to assess for the presence of a difference between the two transfusion strategies. If a significant difference between the two groups exists, T-tests will be performed to compare data points between each group to assess for a significant difference.

Hypothesis: A more restrictive (low Hb) strategy of red cell transfusion will be as effective as, and possibly superior to, the historical (high Hb) approach. Allowing a lower Hb concentration will decrease RBC donor exposure and may decrease the known complications of RBC transfusions. We postulate that no significant difference will exist between the two transfusion groups in regards to hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary status (as evidenced by mean lactate levels) and oxygen utilization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 months to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 4 months to 6.99 years of age
  • surgical candidates for cavopulmonary connection
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of known bleeding disorder
  • presence of known coagulopathy
  • age < 4 months
  • age > 7 years
  • non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
High Hemoglobin group; goal Hb >13g/dl. 10cc/kg RBCs are transfused for any hemoglobin value under 13g/dl regardless whether clinical indication for transfusion exists.
For the High Hb group; transfusions will be given to keep the Hb >13.0 g/dl
Active Comparator: 2
Low Hb transfusion group; goal to not transfuse unless the Hb <9.0 g/dl. 10cc/kg RBCs are transfused only if the Hemoglobin is under 9.0g/dl and clinical indications for transfusion exist.
RBCs will not be transfused unless the Hb < 9.0 g/dl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Arterial Lactate Level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Mean arterial lactate for the first 48 hours post-op.
48 hours
Peak Arterial Lactate Level
Time Frame: 48 hours
Peak arterial lactate level for the 48 hour post-op study period.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oxygen Utilization During the 8 Hour to 72 Hours Post-operative Period.
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Oxygen Use
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Length of Vasoactive Agent Administration
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Volume of Blood Transfused
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days
Mortality Before Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jill M Cholette, MD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on transfusion strategy

Subscribe