A Safety and Effectiveness Study of Intraspinal Gabapentin (MDT2004) for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

August 19, 2013 updated by: MedtronicNeuro

A Randomized Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Response Study of Intraspinal Gabapentin (MDT2004) in Subjects With Chronic, Intractable Pain.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and minimum effective dose of intraspinal gabapentin when delivered through an implanted drug infusion system.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
254

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Innovative Spine Care
    • California
      • Napa, California, United States, 94558
        • Napa Pain Institute
    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34238
        • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71105
        • WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
        • MAPS Applied Research Center
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14203
        • U B Neurosurgery, Inc.
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Pain Research of Oregon, LLC
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • Oregon Health & Science University, Neurosurgery Department
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18103
        • Lehigh Valley Hospital Center for Pain Management
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75240
        • Pinnacle Pain Medicine
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
        • Axis Spine Care/Texas Spine & Joint
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84106
        • Lifetree Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain below the neck present for a minimum of one year.

  • Diagnosis of at least one of the following:

    • back pain with or without leg pain,
    • post-herpetic neuralgia,
    • complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) 1 or 2,
    • diabetic neuropathy,
    • or a general neuropathic condition; medically stable and able to undergo surgery for implantation of the drug infusion system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (0mg/day)
Intraspinal Placebo delivered continuously for 29 days via an implantable infusion system
Drug: Intraspinal Gabapentin
Surgical implantation of a drug infusion system with intrathecal (spinal) delivery of active drug (1 of 3 possible dose levels) or placebo (saline) for 22 days followed by 7 days of infusion at half dose level. Subjects may then continue in open-label treatment with study drug. Dosage in open-label may be adjusted to meet subject needs.
Active Comparator: Gabapentin Low (1mg/day)
Intraspinal Gabapentin Low delivered continuously for 22 days via an implantable infusion system followed by 7 days infusion at half dose
Drug: Intraspinal Gabapentin
Surgical implantation of a drug infusion system with intrathecal (spinal) delivery of active drug (1 of 3 possible dose levels) or placebo (saline) for 22 days followed by 7 days of infusion at half dose level. Subjects may then continue in open-label treatment with study drug. Dosage in open-label may be adjusted to meet subject needs.
Active Comparator: Gabapentin Medium (6mg/day)
Intraspinal Gabapentin Medium delivered continuously for 22 days via an implantable infusion system followed by 7 days infusion at half dose
Drug: Intraspinal Gabapentin
Surgical implantation of a drug infusion system with intrathecal (spinal) delivery of active drug (1 of 3 possible dose levels) or placebo (saline) for 22 days followed by 7 days of infusion at half dose level. Subjects may then continue in open-label treatment with study drug. Dosage in open-label may be adjusted to meet subject needs.
Active Comparator: Gabapentin High (30mg/day)
Intraspinal Gabapentin High delivered continuously for 22 days via an implantable infusion system followed by 7 days infusion at half dose
Drug: Intraspinal Gabapentin
Surgical implantation of a drug infusion system with intrathecal (spinal) delivery of active drug (1 of 3 possible dose levels) or placebo (saline) for 22 days followed by 7 days of infusion at half dose level. Subjects may then continue in open-label treatment with study drug. Dosage in open-label may be adjusted to meet subject needs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in a Pain Rating Scale After 3 Weeks of Blinded Treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline and Post-randomization Day 22
Average pain score calculated over last 7 days of baseline minus average pain score calculated over last 7 days of follow-up using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale where 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain.
Baseline and Post-randomization Day 22
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Randomization to Post-randomization Day 29 (includes dose reduction)
Evaluation of adverse event profiles between placebo and active treatment groups.
Randomization to Post-randomization Day 29 (includes dose reduction)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Analysis Between Active Treatment and Placebo Groups.
Time Frame: Baseline to Post-randomization Day 22
Responders were subjects that reported at least a 30% decrease in average daily pain scores between baseline and Day 22.
Baseline to Post-randomization Day 22

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
MedtronicNeuro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 21, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1622

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings