An Exploratory Study of Rebamipide in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

June 30, 2021 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of rebamipide by once daily intracolonial administration at 0 (placebo), 60, 150, or 300 mg for 6 weeks in patients with active ulcerative colitis, who are being treated with oral aminosalicylic acid (ASA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chubu Region, Japan
      • Chugoku Region, Japan
      • Hokkaido region, Japan
      • Kinki Region, Japan
      • Kyushu Region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with active ulcerative colitis
  2. Patients having an insufficient response to ASA oral formulation: (1) Patients whose ongoing use of ASA oral formulation from ≥2 weeks prior to the day before registration is fixed at mesalazine ≥2 g/day or salazosulfapyridine 3-6 g/day, (2) Patients with continuous bloody stools from ≥2 weeks prior to the day before registration, (3) Patients whose DAI subscores are ≥2 points for "bloody stools" and ≥2 points for "endoscopic findings"
  3. Patients shown via colonoscopy to have major lesions between the sigmoid colon and rectum (with lesions not extending beyond the splenic flexure)
  4. Outpatients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have a history of intestinal resection (other than appendiceal resection)
  2. Patients who have a complication of malignant tumor
  3. Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or possibly pregnant, or who hope to become pregnant during the study period
  4. Patients who have complications of serious cardiac, hepatic or renal impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: 1
0mg rebamipide
Drug: rebamipide
0, 60, 150, 300mg of rebamipide per day for 6 weeks into colon
Experimental: 2
60mg rebamipide
Drug: rebamipide
0, 60, 150, 300mg of rebamipide per day for 6 weeks into colon
Experimental: 3
150mg rebamipide
Drug: rebamipide
0, 60, 150, 300mg of rebamipide per day for 6 weeks into colon
Experimental: 4
300mg rebamipide
Drug: rebamipide
0, 60, 150, 300mg of rebamipide per day for 6 weeks into colon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)
Time Frame: Week 6
Definition of clinical improvement: a decrease of Disease Activity Index [DAI] score for "rectal bleeding" to either 0 or 1 point and a decrease of ≥1 point in the DAI score for "findings on endoscopy" from the baseline
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)
Time Frame: Week 6
Definition of remission: a decrease of the total DAI scores for "rectal bleeding" and "findings on endoscopy" to 0 points
Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 6
Percentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI Subscore
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and week 6
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
The index consisted of 4 subscales: granulation scattering reflected light, vascular pattern, vulnerability of mucosa, and mucosal damage. Each subscale was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 and the total score (the sum of all 4 subscores) ranges from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Baseline and Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 037-06-001
  • JapicCTI-070399 (Other Identifier: Japic)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings