A Study to Compare the Number of Patients With Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) Achieving Heartburn and Regurgitation Symptom Resolution After Treatment With Either Rabeprazole Sodium 20mg, Esomeprazole 20mg or Esomeprazole 40mg

April 2, 2014 updated by: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd

The Rabeprazole and Esomeprazole Reflux Assessment Trial (TREAT)

The primary objective of this study is to compare, the number of patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptom resolution after treatment with either rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is designed to be conducted in a realistic General Practice (GP) setting, enrolling typical Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) patients that present for treatment, and for whom a Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) would normally be prescribed. The study will be conducted over a 4-week period on the basis that current GP standard practice is to treat the GORD patient for a period of 4-weeks prior to reassessment and further follow-up if required. This study is conducted in patients with GORD - associated heartburn (with or without regurgitation) at multiple GP centers, treatment is assigned based on chance (randomized), similar to the toss of a coin and neither doctor or patient knows which treatment they will receive (double-blinded). Following screening to determine eligibility, patients will be randomized to receive oral treatment with either, 20 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg esomeprazole or 40 mg esomeprazole once daily for 4 weeks. This 4-week study encompasses 2 protocol-mandated visits (baseline on day 0 and final visit on day 28). It is hypothesized that rabeprazole 20 mg will be no less effective than (non-inferior) esomeprazole 40 mg for the degree of GORD symptom resolution. Patients will take one tablet (rabeprazole 20 mg or placebo) and one capsule (esomeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg or placebo) each day for 28 days. The study medication will be taken once daily in the morning before breakfast, except the first dose, which will be taken during Visit 1.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1392

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Belconnen, Australia
      • Bondi Junction, Australia
      • Brookvale, Australia
      • Browns Plains, Australia
      • Campbelltown, Australia
      • Campsie, Australia
      • Caringbah, Australia
      • Castle Hill, Australia
      • Charlestown, Australia
      • Dapto, Australia
      • Darlinghurst, Australia
      • Dubbo, Australia
      • Elizabeth, Australia
      • Fairfield, Australia
      • Hoppers Crossing, Australia
      • Ingleburn, Australia
      • Leichhardt, Australia
      • Maroubra, Australia
      • Melton, Australia
      • Mount Druitt, Australia
      • Oaklands Park, Australia
      • Royal Park, Australia
      • Sydney, Australia
      • Wentworthville, Australia
      • Wyoming, Australia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Heartburn (defined as a feeling of burning or pain, rising from the epigastrium or lower part of the chest up towards the neck) with or without regurgitation
  • Patients must have had episodes of heartburn with or without regurgitation for 3 months or longer, and for >= 3 days in the 7 days prior to randomisation
  • Able to understand and complete questionnaires, able to give written informed consent, and have access to a telephone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring endoscopy within 4 weeks of randomisation or with gastrointestinal symptoms that, in the opinion of the investigator, require further investigation prior to or coincident with initiation of PPI therapy which would include, but are not limited to, alarm symptoms such as unintentional weight loss, progressive difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), iron deficiency anaemia and epigastric mass
  • Significant gastrointestinal obstruction, major gastric or oesophageal surgery (excluding appendectomy or cholecystectomy), oesophageal stricture or pyloric stenosis, extra-oesophageal manifestations of reflux disease
  • Patients with Barrett's oesophagus (>3cm), Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, scleroderma, malignancy (other than non-melanoma skin cancers) present within the last 5 years, hypersensitivity to rabeprazole or esomeprazole or any PPI, or any other significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the patients participation or compliance in the study such as past or current history of alcohol or drug abuse, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, respiratory abnormalities, or who have participated in an investigational drug or investigational device study within 30 days prior to the baseline visit or who are expected to do so during the 4 week study period
  • Female patients who are currently pregnant or breast feeding, or who, in the opinion of the investigator, may become pregnant throughout the study
  • Use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) within 7 days of randomisation, anticholinergics, cholinergics, spasmolytics, opiates, sucralfate, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), prokinetics, antibiotics (in relation to H. pylori treatment) or bismuth compounds within 14 days of randomisation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 001
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Drug: Esomeprazole
20mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Drug: Esomeprazole
40mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Active Comparator: 002
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Drug: Esomeprazole
20mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Drug: Esomeprazole
40mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Active Comparator: 003
Rabeprazole 20mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily
Drug: Rabeprazole
20mg once daily for 28days - 1 placebo tab/cap & 1 active tab/cap daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Patients With Complete Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4
Time Frame: week 4 of treatment
Complete resolution is the absence of symptoms for any 7 consecutive days within the 4 week period assessed by the PAGI-SYM scale. This likert scale describes a series of symptoms as follows: 0-None, 1-Very Mild, 2-Mild, 3-Moderate, 4-Severe, 5 Very Severe.
week 4 of treatment
The Number of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution of Regurgitation Symptoms at Week 4
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Complete resolution is the absence of symptoms for any 7 consecutive days within the 4 week period assessed by the PAGI-SYM scale. This likert scale describes various symptoms as follows: 0-none, 1-Very Mild, 2-Mild, 3-Moderate, 4-Severe, 5-Very Severe.
4 weeks
The Number of Patients Achieving Satisfactory Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Satisfactory resolution, which is achieved if, on any 7 consecutive days within the 4 week period, the severity of symptoms never exceeds 'mild' (symptoms must be absent, very mild, or mild) assessed by the PAGI-SYM scale. This likert scale describes various symptoms as follows: 0-none, 1-Very Mild, 2-Mild, 3-Moderate, 4-Severe, 5-Very Severe.
4 weeks
The Number of Patients Achieving Satisfactory Resolution of Regurgitation Symptoms by Week 4
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Satisfactory resolution, which is achieved if, on any 7 consecutive days within the 4 week period, the severity of symptoms never exceeds 'mild' (symptoms must be absent, very mild, or mild)assessed by the PAGI-SYM scale. This likert scale describes a series of symptoms as follows: 0-None, 1-Very Mild, 2-Mild, 3-Moderate, 4-Severe, 5 Very Severe.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Median Time to Complete Resolution of Heartburn Symptoms.
Time Frame: week 4 of treatment
week 4 of treatment
The Median Time to Complete Relief of Regurgitation Symptoms
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks
The Mean Percentage of Participants With 24-hour Heartburn Symptom Free Periods
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 23, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR006397

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings