High Dose or High Dose Frequency Study of Alglucosidase Alfa

February 4, 2014 updated by: Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

An Exploratory, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of High Dose or High Dosing Frequency Alglucosidase Alfa Treatment in Patients With Pompe Disease Who Do Not Have an Optimal Response to the Standard Dose Regimen

Pompe disease (also known as glycogen storage disease Type II) is caused by a deficiency of a critical enzyme in the body called acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). Normally, GAA is used by the body's cells to break down glycogen (a stored form of sugar) within specialized structures called lysosomes. In patients with Pompe disease, an excessive amount of glycogen accumulates and is stored in various tissues, especially heart and skeletal muscle, which prevents their normal function. The objective of this exploratory study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of alternative dosing regimens of alglucosidase alfa in patients with Pompe disease who have not demonstrated an optimal response to the standard dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg every other week after a minimum of 6 months treatment immediately prior to study entry.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Parkville Victoria, Australia
  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
    • New York
      • Glenn Falls, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient or patient's legal guardian must provide signed, informed consent prior to performing any study-related procedures;
  • The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of Pompe disease as defined by documented GAA deficiency in skin fibroblasts or blood;
  • The patient must have been compliant with the standard dosing regimen of alglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg every other week) for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to study entry

  • The patient must have clinical decline or sub-optimal improvement in at least one of the following parameters as compared to their condition prior to the beginning alglucosidase alfa treatment:

    1. Cardiac: Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-score ≥6 or LVM index ≥150 g/m2 after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa; OR
    2. Respiratory: New development of respiratory failure requiring the use of ventilatory assistance (invasive or non-invasive) after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa. Ventilatory assistance must have been required for at least 4 weeks prior to study enrollment; OR
    3. Motor Skills:
  • For patients ≤ 2 years of age at study entry, failure to acquire at least 2 new gross motor milestones after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa; OR
  • For patients > 2 years of age at study entry, worsening of proximal upper extremity muscle weakness as determined by the Investigator through loss of functional use of the upper extremities after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa, OR
  • For patients > 8 years of age at study entry, worsening of proximal upper extremity muscle weakness as determined by the Investigator through longitudinal assessments of manual muscle testing after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa, OR
  • For patients previously ambulatory, progression to use of an assistive device for ambulation due to worsening of proximal lower extremity muscle weakness after a minimum of 6 months of regular treatment with alglucosidase alfa.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For patients < 18 years of age, negative Cross-Reactive Immunologic Material (CRIM) assay result (added in protocol amendment #2);
  • Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with treatment or evaluation of safety and/or efficacy of alglucosidase alfa;
  • The patient is not currently receiving alglucosidase alfa;
  • The patient has major congenital abnormality;
  • The patient has used any investigational product (other than alglucosidase alfa in those regions where the product is not commercially available) within 30 days prior to study enrollment;
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: alglucosidase alfa 20 mg/kg every week
Participants were treated with alglucosidase alfa 20 mg/kg every week for 52 weeks. This was the 'frequent dose' arm.
Biological: alglucosidase alfa
intravenous infusion
Other Names:
  • Recombinant human acid glucosidase
  • Myozyme
Experimental: alglucosidase alfa 40 mg/kg every other week
Participants were treated with alglucosidase alfa 40 mg/kg every other week for 52 weeks. This was the 'high dose' arm.
Biological: alglucosidase alfa
intravenous infusion
Other Names:
  • Recombinant human acid glucosidase
  • Myozyme

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Respiratory Decline on Standard Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; respiratory decline as measured by change in ventilator use is summarized in this outcome. Ventilator use might have improved (less use of ventilator support), had no change, or worsened (more use of ventilator support). Each participant served as his or her own control.
Baseline, Week 52
Participants' Efficacy Response During the Treatment Period as Compared to Baseline for Participants With Motor Function Decline on Standard Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Participants were enrolled based on clinical decline or sub-optimal clinical response in cardiac, respiratory and/or motor function parameters pre-study while on standard treatment. Each participant was evaluated at Week 52 for change from baseline in the criteria that declined; motor function decline primarily based on Gross Motor Function Measure 66 and Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory results is summarized. Participants could gain motor function (improve), had no change (declined stopped), or continued loss (worsened). Each participant served as his or her own control.
Baseline, Week 52
Summary of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During the Treatment Period
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 52
Overall safety summary of participants experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), treatment-related AEs, and Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs). Summary is based on Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as AEs that occurred following the initiation of study treatment.
Day 1 up to Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Scores
Time Frame: Day 0
Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. Negative values indicate a smaller than mean LVM and values higher than 0 indicate a larger LVM than the mean. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.
Day 0
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass (LVM) Z-Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Z-Scores indicate the number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean in a normal distribution. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease and positive change from baseline an increase in LVM Z-score. The normal range is -2 to 2 and greater than 2 may indicate left ventricular hypertrophy. The Z-scores for all parameters are calculated with reference to the normative data from the Children's Hospital, Boston, MA (Colan, 1992, J Am Coll Cardiol) based on the reference population with matched body surface area (BSA). Z-scores for LVM were provided by the central cardiologist.
Baseline, Week 52
Baseline Values for Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
Time Frame: Day 0
Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline. Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.
Day 0
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Cardiac pathophysiology was assessed by a central cardiologist using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiogram at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment (Week 52). Left Ventricular Mass is adjusted to the participant's body surface area in the calculation of LVMI.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Ventilator Use at Last Assessment (Approximately Week 52)
Time Frame: Baseline, approximately Week 52
The change from baseline in ventilator use at the last assessment is summarized as improved (less use of ventilator support), no change, worsened (increased use of ventilator support), and did not use ventilator support.
Baseline, approximately Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Strength Measured by the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Total Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Body strength is measured by the MMT score on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores representing greater body strength.
Baseline, Week 52
Baseline Values of Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results
Time Frame: Day 0
The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.
Day 0
Change From Baseline in Raw Scores for Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) Results at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 contains sixty-six questions with a total raw score range of 0 - 198. Raw scores are derived from the following dimensions: Lying and rolling = 12; Sitting = 45; Crawling and kneeling = 30; Standing = 39; Walking, running and jumping = 72. Higher scores indicate better gross motor functions.
Baseline, Week 52
Baseline Values in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI)
Time Frame: Day 0
The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near "0" reflecting low capability and scores near "100" reflecting high capability.
Day 0
Change From Baseline in Mobility as Measured by the Pompe Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (Pompe PEDI) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The Pompe PEDI is a disease specific version of the PEDI that was developed to assess functional capabilities and performance in children with Pompe disease from 2 months through adolescence. Change from baseline results for the mobility domain are reported. Scaled scores are used as an evaluative measure of change in performance over time with acquisition of new skills or new levels of independence. The range of scores is from 0-100 with scores near "0" reflecting low capability and scores near "100" reflecting high capability.
Baseline, Week 52
Baseline Values for Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Day 0
Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Day 0
Change From Baseline in Normative Physical Component Summary of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Health related quality of life is measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for participants ≥14 years of age. SF-36 normative-based scoring has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Baseline, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AGLU03306

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings