Dose-Finding Safety and Efficacy Trial of Org 50081 (Esmirtazapine) in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms (177001/P06472/MK-8265-013)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Doses of Org 50081 in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With the Menopause
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Postmenopausal women, defined as:
- 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea;
- OR 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) levels >40 mIU/mL;
- OR 6 weeks post surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy.
- Be ≥ 40 and ≤ 65 years of age;
- Have a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤ 32 kg/m^2;
- Minimum of 7 moderate to severe hot flushes per day or 50 per week, as quantified from daily diary recordings during at least 7 days preceding randomization to trial medication;
- Able to handle the electronic diary device after training and having at least 80% compliance on complete daily diary entries during the period prior to randomization;
- Give voluntary written Informed Consent (IC) after the scope and nature of the investigation had been explained, before screening evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History or presence of any malignancy, except non-melanoma skin cancers;
- Any clinically unstable or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, endocrine, respiratory, hematological, neurological, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease that would put the subject at safety risk or mask measure of efficacy;
- History of seizures or epilepsy;
- History or presence of clinically significant depression or other psychiatric disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, might compromise or confound the subject's participation in the trial;
- Abnormal clinically relevant vaginal bleeding;
- Any clinically relevant (opinion of investigator) abnormal finding during physical, gynecological and breast examination at screening;
- Abnormal, clinically significant results of mammography;
- Abnormal cervical smear test results (corresponding to Pap III and higher, including Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL), High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL), Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 1 and higher);
- Hematological or biochemical values at screening outside the reference ranges considered clinically relevant in the opinion of the investigator;
- High Blood Pressure (BP);
- Use of any drug product containing estrogens, progestins, androgens or tibolone prior to screening (and up to and including randomization) within a pre-specified period;
Any of the following treatments within the last 4 weeks prior to screening (and up to and including randomization):
- tricyclic antidepressants, Serotonin Noradrenergic Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), SSRIs, Monoamine Oxidase (MAO)-inhibitors, mirtazapine
- antianxiety drugs, antipsychotics
- coumarin-derivatives
- α-adrenergic agents
- β-blockers
- dopamine agonists/antagonists
- opiates, barbiturates
- raloxifene
- homeopathic menopausal preparations or other preparations intended to treat climacteric or Central Nervous System (CNS) symptoms
- hepatic microsomal enzyme-inducing drugs or drugs known to affect or interfere with the pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine;
- Any condition or disease that could affect or interfere with the pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine;
- Subjects sensitive to trial medication or its components;
- Use of any investigational drug and/or participation in another clinical trial within the last eight weeks prior to screening;
- History of alcohol and/or drug abuse within the last two years prior to screening.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants receive encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 12 weeks.
|
Encapsulated placebo tablets in Swedish Orange hard gelatin DB-B capsules for blinding purposes.
Encapsulated tablets were administered orally once daily in the evening prior to sleep for 12 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Esmirtazapine 2.25 mg
Participants receive esmirtazapine, 2.25 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally QD for up to 12 weeks.
|
Four different doses (2.25, 4.5, 9.0, and 18 mg) encapsulated esmirtazapine tablets in Swedish Orange hard gelatin DB-B capsules for blinding purposes.
Encapsulated tablets were administered orally once daily in the evening prior to sleep for 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Esmirtazapine 4.5 mg
Participants receive esmirtazapine, 4.5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally QD for up to 12 weeks.
|
Four different doses (2.25, 4.5, 9.0, and 18 mg) encapsulated esmirtazapine tablets in Swedish Orange hard gelatin DB-B capsules for blinding purposes.
Encapsulated tablets were administered orally once daily in the evening prior to sleep for 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Esmirtazapine 9 mg
Participants receive esmirtazapine, 9 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally QD for up to 12 weeks.
|
Four different doses (2.25, 4.5, 9.0, and 18 mg) encapsulated esmirtazapine tablets in Swedish Orange hard gelatin DB-B capsules for blinding purposes.
Encapsulated tablets were administered orally once daily in the evening prior to sleep for 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Esmirtazapine 18 mg
Participants receive esmirtazapine, 18 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally QD for up to 12 weeks.
|
Four different doses (2.25, 4.5, 9.0, and 18 mg) encapsulated esmirtazapine tablets in Swedish Orange hard gelatin DB-B capsules for blinding purposes.
Encapsulated tablets were administered orally once daily in the evening prior to sleep for 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Frequency Score A) at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
|
Participants recorded the frequency (number) of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) on an electronic diary card (LogPad®) on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
Frequency Score A was based on the number of moderate hot flushes + the number of severe hot flushes in one day.
Baseline average was derived from, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
Weekly averages during treatment were calculated if at least 4 days with non-missing data were completely observed; if less than 4 days were completely observed, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (last observation carried forward, or LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Severity Score A) at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
|
Participants recorded the severity of hot flushes on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
The severity of hot flushes was defined as: mild (sensation of heat without sweating); moderate (sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity); and severe (sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity).
Severity Score A was calculated as the number of moderate hot flushes x 2 + the number of severe hot flushes x 3, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flushes per week.
If no hot flushes were experienced, this was to be recorded as 'no sensation of heat'.
Baseline values were based on, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
If less than 4 days were completely observed during treatment, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Frequency Score A) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
Participants recorded the frequency (number) of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
Frequency Score A was based on the number of moderate hot flushes + the number of severe hot flushes in one day.
Baseline average was derived from, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
Weekly averages during treatment were calculated if at least 4 days with non-missing data were completely observed; if less than 4 days were completely observed, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Severity Score A) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
Participants recorded the severity of hot flushes on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
The severity of hot flushes was defined as: mild (sensation of heat without sweating); moderate (sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity); and severe (sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity).
Severity Score A was calculated as the number of moderate hot flushes x 2 + the number of severe hot flushes x 3, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flushes per week.
If no hot flushes were experienced, this was to be recorded as 'no sensation of heat'.
Baseline values were based on, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
If less than 4 days were completely observed during treatment, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Frequency Score A) by Week Excluding Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to Week 12
|
Participants recorded the frequency (number) of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
Frequency Score A was based on the number of moderate hot flushes + the number of severe hot flushes in one day.
Baseline average was derived from, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
Weekly averages during treatment were calculated if at least 4 days with non-missing data were completely observed; if less than 4 days were completely observed, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and Up to Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity of Moderate/Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Severity Score A) by Week Excluding Weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 12
|
Participants recorded the severity of hot flushes on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
The severity of hot flushes was defined as: mild (sensation of heat without sweating); moderate (sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity); and severe (sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity).
Severity Score A was calculated as the number of moderate hot flushes x 2 + the number of severe hot flushes x 3, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flushes per week.
If no hot flushes were experienced, this was to be recorded as 'no sensation of heat'.
Baseline values were based on, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
If less than 4 days were completely observed during treatment, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and up to Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Moderate/Severe Composite Score (Composite Score A) by Week
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 12
|
Composite Score A was calculated as Severity Score A x Frequency Score A.
|
Baseline and up to Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Mild to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Frequency Score B) by Week
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 12
|
Participants recorded the frequency (number) of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
Frequency Score B was based on the number of mild hot flushes + the number of moderate hot flushes + the number of severe hot flushes in one day.
Baseline average was derived from, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
Weekly averages during treatment were calculated if at least 4 days with non-missing data were completely observed; if less than 4 days were completely observed, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and up to Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity of Mild to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (Severity Score B) by Week
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 12
|
Participants recorded the severity of hot flushes on a LogPad on a daily basis during screening and treatment.
The severity of hot flushes was defined as: mild (sensation of heat without sweating); moderate (sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity); and severe (sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity).
Severity Score B was calculated as the number of mild hot flushes + the number of moderate hot flushes x 2 + the number of severe hot flushes x 3, divided by the total number of all hot flushes per week.
If no hot flushes were experienced, this was to be recorded as 'no sensation of heat'.
Baseline values were based on, at most, 7 completely observed pre-treatment days.
If less than 4 days were completely observed during treatment, the averages of the previous week were carried forward (LOCF).
If the number of days observed in Week 1 were not sufficient, baseline values were carried forward.
|
Baseline and up to Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Mild to Severe Composite Symptoms Score (Composite Score B) by Week
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 12
|
Composite Score B was calculated as Severity Score B x Frequency Score B.
|
Baseline and up to Week 12
|
|
Total Number of Responders by Week
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
A participant was defined as a (hot flush) responder for a study week if a reduction of at least 50% for average daily frequency of moderate/severe vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) (Frequency Score A) compared to Baseline was recorded.
A study week was taken into account if at least 4 days were completely observed.
The last observation was carried forward if there were less than 4 complete days observed.
In cases where Week 1 did not have 4 days that were completely observed, the participant was considered a non-responder.
An LOCF approach was used.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
|
Total Number of Remitters by Week
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
A participant was defined as a (hot flush) remitter for a study week if at most one moderate/severe vasomotor symptom per day on average was recorded.
A study week was taken into account if at least 4 days were completely observed.
The last observation was carried forward if there were less than 4 complete days observed.
In cases where Week 1 did not have 4 days that were completely observed, the participant was considered a non-remitter.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) Sleep Problems Symptoms Domain Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
The WHQ is a 36-item, user-friendly, and rapid way of assessing nine domains of physical and emotional health for mid-aged women.
Participants self-administered the WHQ questionnaire; scoring is based on a 4-point scale as follows: 'Yes definitely=1', 'Yes sometimes=2', 'No not much=3' and 'No not at all=4'.
Each score is transformed to a value '1' for scores '1' and '2' and to a value '0' for scores '3' and '4'.
Sleep problems encompass Items 1, 11, and 29 of the 36 total items.
The transformed sums of items 1, 11, and 29 were divided by 3 to get the score; therefore, the domain ranges from 0 to 1, where lower values are better.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change From Baseline in WHQ Vasomotor Symptoms Domain Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
The WHQ is a 36-item, user-friendly, and rapid way of assessing nine domains of physical and emotional health for mid-aged women.
Participants self-administered the WHQ questionnaire; scoring is based on a 4-point scale as follows: 'Yes definitely=1', 'Yes sometimes=2', 'No not much=3' and 'No not at all=4'.
Each score is transformed to a value '1' for scores '1' and '2' and to a value '0' for scores '3' and '4'.
Vasomotor symptoms encompass Items 19 and 27 of the 36 total items.
The transformed sums of items 19+27 are divided by 2 to get the score; therefore, the domain ranges from 0 to 1, where lower values are better.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Antagonists
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Serotonin Agents
- Antidepressive Agents
- Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists
- Serotonin Antagonists
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
- Histamine H1 Antagonists
- Histamine Antagonists
- Histamine Agents
- Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists
- Mirtazapine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P06472
- White Moonstone (Other Identifier: Organon Protocol Name)
- 177001 (Other Identifier: Organon Protocol Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Study Data/Documents
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.