Effect of Topical Fluoroquinolones on Epithelial Wound Healing After PRK

December 7, 2007 updated by: Donnenfeld, Eric, M.D.

Effect of Gatifloxacin 0.3% and Moxifloxacin 0.5% on Epithelial Wound Healing After Photorefractive Keratectomy

The prescribed antibiotic for prophylaxis of infection following PRK should be effective at eradicating a potential infection. In addition, the antibiotic should have a rapid onset of action, effectively penetrate the target tissue, and be safe and not toxic to any layer of the healing cornea, especially the epithelium. Several studies have investigated the toxicity of the fourth generation fluoroquinolones on the corneal epithelium and studies have demonstrated that gatifloxacin is less deleterious to the healing cornea than moxifloxacin. Most of these studies, however, have been conducted in animals. This was a retrospective chart review.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Prior generation fluoroquinolones predominantly either inhibit topoisomerase II (DNA Gyrase) or topoisomerase IV and therefore only require one genetic mutation for bacteria to develop resistance. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolones are equally effective against topoisomerase II and IV, which significantly expands their spectrum of action against gram-positive agents and atypical mycobacteria and Nocardia . This duality of action of the fourth generation fluoroquinolones requires that for bacteria to become resistant to these agents, the bacteria must undergo two genetic mutations resulting in a significantly decreased chance of an organism developing resistance.Minimum inhibitory concentrations determined in vitro suggest that fourth-generation fluoroquinolones are more effective than second- and third-generation fluoroquinolones against gram-positive bacteria including Staphylococcal species found in endophthalmitis and bacterial keratitis cultures. The increased efficacy of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones make these antibiotics important agents to evaluate for prophylaxis against post-PRK infections. This was a retrospective chart review.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presented to the practice of a cornea trained ophthalmic consultant.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were a healthy male or female 18 years of age or older and were candidates for bilateral PRK.
  • Eligible patients had a best-corrected Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity score equivalent to a Snellen score of 20/30 or better in each eye, had a stable prescription for 1 year, were willing to participate in the study, and were able to comprehend and sign the informed consent form.
  • All subjects were instructed that if they decide not to participate they could withdraw from the study at any time.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of refractive or other ocular surgery in either eye.
  • Patients with any condition which could delay wound healing were not eligible to participate.
  • They were excluded if they had poor tolerance to any component of the masked study fluoroquinolones, Acular® LS (Allergan) or Pred Forte® (Allergan).
  • Patients were also excluded if they required the use of a systemic antibiotic during the study period, were involved in another investigational study or had participated in a study within 30 days prior to the start of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
1
Corneal epithelial wound healing with moxifloxacin
Drug: gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin
Comparison of wound healing between drugs
Other Names:
  • Zymar and Vigamox
2
Corneal epithelial wound healing with gatifloxacin
Drug: gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin
Comparison of wound healing between drugs
Other Names:
  • Zymar and Vigamox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Wound Healing
Time Frame: Days after PRK
Days after PRK

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Donnenfeld, Eric, M.D.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eric Donnenfeld, MD, OCLI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 10, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 10, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2007

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Donnenfeld2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings