Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis
Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis ES Soft Tissue Graft
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Male, adult patients
- ASA I-III patients
- Non-complicated primary inguinal hernia (classification according to Gilbert I-II-III-IV-V-VI, modified. according to Rutkow and Robbins) performed in non-emergency setting and repaired with a Lichtenstein's hernioplasty using polypropylene or Surgisis mesh
- Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Recurrent hernias
- Any condition preventing a correct evaluation of pain (non-cooperative patient, blind patient, drug addicted)
- Hypersensitivity to any drug in study
- Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study
Outcomes:
General objectives of the study will be:
- to determine the safety of the Lichtenstein's hernioplasty with Surgisis ES by noting any complications observed intraoperatively and postoperatively
- to determine the efficacy of the Lichtenstein's hernioplasty with Surgisis ES in comparison with the traditional method with polypropylene mesh by noting the grade of postoperative pain, discomfort, quality of life, the rate of wound infection and other complications, and the recurrence rate.
The specific objectives of the study will be:
- to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), simple verbal scale (SVS) and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups.
- to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS) and simple verbal scale (SVS).
- to measure the postoperative health general status and quality of life with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.
- to rate the wound infection risk.
- to monitor any other postoperative complication observed in the immediate, mid-term and long-term postoperative period.
- to measure the recurrence rate.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40138
- St.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male, adult patients
- ASA I-III patients
- Non-complicated primary inguinal hernia (classification according to Gilbert I-II-III-IV-V-VI, modified. according to Rutkow and Robbins) performed in non-emergency setting and repaired with a Lichtenstein's hernioplasty using polypropylene or Surgisis mesh
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent hernias
- Any condition preventing a correct evaluation of pain (non-cooperative patient, blind patient, drug addicted)
- Hypersensitivity to any drug in study
- Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
The Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty with polypropylene mesh
|
The Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty consists of a swatch of polypropylene mesh, partway slit 1 cm from its inferior edge to accommodate the spermatic cord.
The mesh is sutured circumferentially to the internal oblique abdominal muscle, the rectus sheath and the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament.
The tails of the mesh are drawn around the cord and the inferior edge of each tail is sutured to the inguinal ligament.
In case of direct hernias, no effort is made to repair the hernia itself.
In indirect hernias the sac is excised, except for sliding hernias.
The polypropylene mesh group: in this group of patients the polypropylene mesh will be fixed by the above mentioned sutures in Prolene 3/0.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
The Surgisis mesh group: in this group of patients a 7x20cm Surgisis ES Soft Tissue Graft sheet will be used.
In sterile manner the sheet will be removed from the peel-open package.
The Surgisis sheet will be cut and fashioned as appropriate.
Then the pre-shaped sheet will will be placed for at least 10 minutes into a sterile dish with sterile room-temperature normo-saline to be rehydrated.
Using aseptic techique, the rehydrated Surgisis sheet will be transferred to the already prepared and dissected inguinal region and will be fixed with PDS II 2/0.
|
The Surgisis mesh group: in this group of patients a 7x20cm Surgisis ES Soft Tissue Graft sheet will be used.
In sterile manner the sheet will be removed from the peel-open package.
The Surgisis sheet will be cut and fashioned as appropriate.
Then the pre-shaped sheet will will be placed for at least 10 minutes into a sterile dish with sterile room-temperature normo-saline to be rehydrated.
Using aseptic techique, the rehydrated Surgisis sheet will be transferred to the already prepared and dissected inguinal region and will be fixed with PDS II 2/0.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), simple verbal scale (SVS) and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS) and simple verbal scale (SVS).
Time Frame: 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
|
to rate the wound infection risk.
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
|
to monitor any other postoperative complication observed in the immediate, mid-term and long-term postoperative period.
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
|
to measure the recurrence rate
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Luca Ansaloni, MD, St.Orsola-malpighi Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 81/2002/O
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.